Salta al contenuto
  • Categorie
  • Recenti
  • Tag
  • Popolare
  • Utenti
  • Gruppi
Collassa
Logo del marchio
  1. Home
  2. Hardware
  3. CPU & Overclock
  4. The new conqueror is here, the analysis of Core 2 Quad CPU, QX9770

The new conqueror is here, the analysis of Core 2 Quad CPU, QX9770

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato CPU & Overclock
3 Post 0 Autori 1.4k Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Risposta alla discussione
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • W Non in linea
    W Non in linea
    windwithme
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #1

    I recalled that Intel was just launched its Yorkfield 45nm quad core CPU

    Intel release Core 2 Quad QX9650 333X9=>3G cache 6MB x 2 version to replace the

    65nm QX6850 333X9=>3G cache 4MB x 2.

    Meanwhile,

    the Dual core Wolfdale(45nm) CPU will be launched in market before this month.

    I hope that can improve the issues of high temperature and high power consumption when the system runs under high FSB.

    It really surprise me that Intel releases a higher model of Quad core CPU later on,

    the core 2 quad CPU, QX9770, 400x8 => 3.2G, cache up to 6MB x 2.

    That is the highest end model of the series. Also,

    it is another model that breakthrough 3G after dual coreE8500.

    You guys might know that C2D’s FSB could be reach 450~600MHz.

    Besides, C2Q’s FSB is also can climb up to 400 to 500MHz.

    This is the first in history that Intel set their C2Q processor’s default FSB

    At 400MHz.

    Let’s take a look at our super star, Intel Core 2 Quad QX9770.

    qx977001qv2.jpg

    qx977002je2.jpg

    It test with the Motherboard DFI LANParty LT X38-T2R

    qx977003jd3.jpg

    qx977004an5.jpg

    Up to now, there is only X48 chipset can be officially supports rated FSB1066 processor.

    Some likes P35 or X38 may occurs problem while the FSB is around 1333/1066.

    But one thing I knew is, most of motherboard manufacturers are putting efforts to fix those BIOS issue of P35/ X38 right now.

    I believe that won’t be a problem soon that P35 & X38 motherboard can support QX9770 stably.

    The specification of the test system

    CPU:INTEL Core 2 Quad QX9770

    MB: DFI LANParty LT X38 T2R

    DRAM:CORSAIR Dominator TWIN2X2048-8888C4DF

    VGA:ELSA 8800GT 512M

    HD:Seagate 7200.10 320G

    POWER:POWER:Corsair HX520W Modular Power Supply

    Cooler:Thermaltake V1

    qx977005gu0.jpg

    CPU: 400X8=>3200Mhz

    DRAM: DDRII 800 CL3 3-3-9

    SUPER PI 32M&CPUMARK

    qx9770dpi1mmb6.png

    SUPER PI 32MX4

    qx9770dpi32mun0.png

    PCMARK2005

    qx9770dpcmarkyx7.png

    CrystalMark

    qx9770dcmnp2.png

    CINEBENCH R10

    qx9770dcbqg9.png

    OC

    CPU: 400X10=>4000Mhz 1.328V

    DARM: DDRII 800 CL3 3-3-9

    SUPER PI 32M&CPUMARK

    qx97704gpi1mvq9.png

    SUPER PI 32MX4

    qx97704gpi32msx8.png

    PCMARK2005

    qx97704gpcmarknr8.png

    Crystal Mark

    qx97704gcmqu7.png

    CINEBENCH R10

    qx97704gcbmj2.png

    ELSA 8800GT 512M,600/1800

    3DMARK2003

    qx97704g2003vl2.png

    3DMARK2005

    qx97704g2005oj0.png

    3DMARK2006

    qx97704g2006ua6.png

    Frankly, the 45nm process CPU is really having more advantages in overclocking.

    The previous model 65nm process CPU QX6X00 series, the 3.6G with 1.35 to 1.45V is almost shows the excellence of itself.

    The new process, 45nm, brings an obvious improvement in performance.

    I found that QX9x00 series(45nm) CPU is easy to reach 4G stably under 1.4V.

    In fact, I didn’t make any temperature comparison between the heats out from the CPU cooler of 45nm & 65nm CPU.

    But I felt that the heat air out from 45nm CPU is lower than 65nm CPU.

    That is a big improvement on heat dissipation issue than C2D period.

    For my personal opinion, QX9770 is a brand new processor with 400MHz FSB,

    but the OC performance in FSB is a bit not as good as QX9650(with P35 & X38).

    Maybe the reason is something about that P35/ X38 are start at FSB 266/333MHz.

    I really hope that motherboard manufacturer will adjust the BIOS to let QX9770 to perform much better.

    Anyway, I will make a more formal comparison when X48 is launched.

    To see whether QX9770 can performs better.

    In-coming review:

    CORSAIR CM3X1024-1800C7DIN

    qx977006ki3.jpg

    MSI X 38 Diamonds

    qx977007fw8.jpg

    1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
    0
    • W Non in linea
      W Non in linea
      windwithme
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #2

      I recalled that Intel was just launched its Yorkfield 45nm quad core CPU

      Intel release Core 2 Quad QX9650 333X9=>3G cache 6MB x 2 version to replace the

      65nm QX6850 333X9=>3G cache 4MB x 2.

      Meanwhile,

      the Dual core Wolfdale(45nm) CPU will be launched in market before this month.

      I hope that can improve the issues of high temperature and high power consumption when the system runs under high FSB.

      It really surprise me that Intel releases a higher model of Quad core CPU later on,

      the core 2 quad CPU, QX9770, 400x8 => 3.2G, cache up to 6MB x 2.

      That is the highest end model of the series. Also,

      it is another model that breakthrough 3G after dual coreE8500.

      You guys might know that C2D’s FSB could be reach 450~600MHz.

      Besides, C2Q’s FSB is also can climb up to 400 to 500MHz.

      This is the first in history that Intel set their C2Q processor’s default FSB

      At 400MHz.

      Let’s take a look at our super star, Intel Core 2 Quad QX9770.

      qx977001qv2.jpg

      qx977002je2.jpg

      It test with the Motherboard DFI LANParty LT X38-T2R

      qx977003jd3.jpg

      qx977004an5.jpg

      Up to now, there is only X48 chipset can be officially supports rated FSB1066 processor.

      Some likes P35 or X38 may occurs problem while the FSB is around 1333/1066.

      But one thing I knew is, most of motherboard manufacturers are putting efforts to fix those BIOS issue of P35/ X38 right now.

      I believe that won’t be a problem soon that P35 & X38 motherboard can support QX9770 stably.

      The specification of the test system

      CPU:INTEL Core 2 Quad QX9770

      MB: DFI LANParty LT X38 T2R

      DRAM:CORSAIR Dominator TWIN2X2048-8888C4DF

      VGA:ELSA 8800GT 512M

      HD:Seagate 7200.10 320G

      POWER:POWER:Corsair HX520W Modular Power Supply

      Cooler:Thermaltake V1

      qx977005gu0.jpg

      CPU: 400X8=>3200Mhz

      DRAM: DDRII 800 CL3 3-3-9

      SUPER PI 32M&CPUMARK

      qx9770dpi1mmb6.png

      SUPER PI 32MX4

      qx9770dpi32mun0.png

      PCMARK2005

      qx9770dpcmarkyx7.png

      CrystalMark

      qx9770dcmnp2.png

      CINEBENCH R10

      qx9770dcbqg9.png

      OC

      CPU: 400X10=>4000Mhz 1.328V

      DARM: DDRII 800 CL3 3-3-9

      SUPER PI 32M&CPUMARK

      qx97704gpi1mvq9.png

      SUPER PI 32MX4

      qx97704gpi32msx8.png

      PCMARK2005

      qx97704gpcmarknr8.png

      Crystal Mark

      qx97704gcmqu7.png

      CINEBENCH R10

      qx97704gcbmj2.png

      ELSA 8800GT 512M,600/1800

      3DMARK2003

      qx97704g2003vl2.png

      3DMARK2005

      qx97704g2005oj0.png

      3DMARK2006

      qx97704g2006ua6.png

      Frankly, the 45nm process CPU is really having more advantages in overclocking.

      The previous model 65nm process CPU QX6X00 series, the 3.6G with 1.35 to 1.45V is almost shows the excellence of itself.

      The new process, 45nm, brings an obvious improvement in performance.

      I found that QX9x00 series(45nm) CPU is easy to reach 4G stably under 1.4V.

      In fact, I didn’t make any temperature comparison between the heats out from the CPU cooler of 45nm & 65nm CPU.

      But I felt that the heat air out from 45nm CPU is lower than 65nm CPU.

      That is a big improvement on heat dissipation issue than C2D period.

      For my personal opinion, QX9770 is a brand new processor with 400MHz FSB,

      but the OC performance in FSB is a bit not as good as QX9650(with P35 & X38).

      Maybe the reason is something about that P35/ X38 are start at FSB 266/333MHz.

      I really hope that motherboard manufacturer will adjust the BIOS to let QX9770 to perform much better.

      Anyway, I will make a more formal comparison when X48 is launched.

      To see whether QX9770 can performs better.

      In-coming review:

      CORSAIR CM3X1024-1800C7DIN

      qx977006ki3.jpg

      MSI X 38 Diamonds

      qx977007fw8.jpg

      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      0
      • M Non in linea
        M Non in linea
        megthebest
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #3

        Amazing Cpu!!!

        thanks, i'm so curious to see the MSI X38 mainboard !

        Bye

        Max

        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
        0
        • P Non in linea
          P Non in linea
          principino1984
          scritto su ultima modifica di
          #4

          that is a hell nice chip...

          but right now I don't see any numbers from it.. probably as you wrote on your tests it's because there's still no mainboard that supports is really...

          anyway what's actually the highest stable oc that you've been able to reach?

          thanks for sharing!

          Marco

          1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
          0

          Ciao! Sembra che tu sia interessato a questa conversazione, ma non hai ancora un account.

          Stanco di dover scorrere gli stessi post a ogni visita? Quando registri un account, tornerai sempre esattamente dove eri rimasto e potrai scegliere di essere avvisato delle nuove risposte (tramite email o notifica push). Potrai anche salvare segnalibri e votare i post per mostrare il tuo apprezzamento agli altri membri della comunità.

          Con il tuo contributo, questo post potrebbe essere ancora migliore 💗

          Registrati Accedi
          Rispondi
          • Risposta alla discussione
          Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
          • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
          • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
          • Più Voti


          • Accedi

          • Non hai un account? Registrati

          • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • Primo post
            Ultimo post
          0
          • Categorie
          • Recenti
          • Tag
          • Popolare
          • Utenti
          • Gruppi