<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Passati i 57k... ma sono davvero da contare?</p>
<p><a href="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8925312">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8925312</a></p>
<p>"MB: ASUS P5WD2-E, BIOS:0302 on ARC Bed Rev. 2.0(for Copper container support) CPU: Pentium4-670 SL7Z3 3507A671T by LN2 cooling with Kuri-Pro4 Memory: Corsair PC2-5400UL 512MB x2 VGA: ATI Radeon X1900CF/XTX @796.50/891.00 with Catalyst-6.3, ATITool-0.25b14, ATITrayTool-1.0.5.824 Remarks: This score is obtained accidentally!!! After I got the preceding score 55178, I raised FSB@377MHz and try Nature. Soon the display was freezed... I thought that my system had downed, but then, the system recovered and showed this score!!! I think that this score is buggy, beyond tweaking, but ORB server received it correctly... So I decided to publish both scores. I believe that I can't get such a score again... ...before Yonah/Merom/Conroe;-)"</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/483/3dmark-01-57k-by-kyosen</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 07:01:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/483.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:58:11 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Mon, 03 Apr 2006 15:13:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>mitico dragotic!!</p>
<p>heheh</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33996</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33996</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Febry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 15:13:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Sat, 01 Apr 2006 10:29:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>principino1984  ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>
<p>cn la x550?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Certo.Magari nn ottimizziamo il sistema..tanto nn Ã¨ molto lo scarto.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33995</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33995</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[domico82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 10:29:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Sat, 01 Apr 2006 08:03:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>beh, a quanto ne so il 3dmark01 Ã¨ uno fra i piÃ¹ difficili ed impegnativi (infatti lo scarto sempre <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/crazy2.gif.82a7e041822a710e620c2aad160d0949.gif" alt=":crazy2:" />)</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33994</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33994</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kioji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 08:03:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Sat, 01 Apr 2006 07:47:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>cn la x550?</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33993</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33993</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[principino1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 07:47:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Sat, 01 Apr 2006 07:43:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Cosa voglio fare?</p>
<p>Allora Test:3dmark01</p>
<p>Occa il procio a + nn posso e lascia la skeda a default.</p>
<p>Io faro' il test col mio venice a default e skeda a default</p>
<p>Vediamo ki fa di + e se ho ragione o no</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33992</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33992</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[domico82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 07:43:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:52:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>ho ancora la mitica x550 @liquido ... ahaahah <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
<p>ke test vuoi fa? sempre pronto x i test <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/grin.gif.3e001a1751d5ca14fbd0ba2a6c0e4286.gif" alt=";D" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33991</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33991</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[principino1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:52:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:45:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Beh..tu mi sa ke hai un opteron..ke scheda video hai ora?TÃ¨ tornata la GTO2?O hai ancora la x550?</p>
<p>Magari possiamo dimostrarlo..io col 3200 a def e con la x850xt e tu col procio occato scommetto ke fai di +..</p>
<p>Ke dici?</p>
<p>Famo qualke test?</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33990</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33990</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[domico82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:45:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:32:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Comy82  ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>
<p>Secondo me nn conta quasi nulla..basta ke hai una CPU da 3700Mhz e una geffo 440 ke risulta + prestante di un 3200 con una X850...</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>un attimino esagerato come paragone....cmq come test Ã¨ sempre uno dei piÃ¹ pesanti che c'Ã¨... a volte nei bench si passa il 05 ma nel 01 ci si pianta....nn sputiamo in cima a questi bench che hanno fatto la storia.. <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/wink.png.981122a168c49b836247b5559b1cdcb0.png" alt=";)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33989</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33989</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[principino1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:32:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:27:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Secondo me nn conta quasi nulla..basta ke hai una CPU da 3700Mhz e una geffo 440 ke risulta + prestante di un 3200 con una X850...</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33988</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33988</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[domico82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:27:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:02:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>bho...il 2001 ormai nn conta molto...</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33987</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33987</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Febry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:02:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:57:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Fasullo??</p>
<p>Mi sa ke il record Ã¨ sui 50K scarsi..giusto?</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33986</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33986</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[domico82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:57:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:03:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Mikestore  ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>
<p>3-4 giorni gli do..</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>nemmeno...hanno giÃ  levato il link... <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/police.gif.1aa61d453969bbed351f3b9a6753e289.gif" alt=":police:" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33985</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33985</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[principino1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:03:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:03:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>3-4 giorni gli do..</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33984</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33984</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikestore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:03:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3dmark 01... 57k by kyosen on Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:58:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Passati i 57k... ma sono davvero da contare?</p>
<p><a href="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8925312">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8925312</a></p>
<p>"MB: ASUS P5WD2-E, BIOS:0302 on ARC Bed Rev. 2.0(for Copper container support) CPU: Pentium4-670 SL7Z3 3507A671T by LN2 cooling with Kuri-Pro4 Memory: Corsair PC2-5400UL 512MB x2 VGA: ATI Radeon X1900CF/XTX @796.50/891.00 with Catalyst-6.3, ATITool-0.25b14, ATITrayTool-1.0.5.824 Remarks: This score is obtained accidentally!!! After I got the preceding score 55178, I raised FSB@377MHz and try Nature. Soon the display was freezed... I thought that my system had downed, but then, the system recovered and showed this score!!! I think that this score is buggy, beyond tweaking, but ORB server received it correctly... So I decided to publish both scores. I believe that I can't get such a score again... ...before Yonah/Merom/Conroe;-)"</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33983</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/33983</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[principino1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:58:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>