<![CDATA[Primi test per AM2/DDR2 AMD.... mah...]]>Non ci siamo ancora... le prestazioni sono peggiori dell'attuale piattaforma... causa degli schifosissimi timings delle ddr2...

Ecco l'articolo in inglese preso da Tom's Hardware:

Please note that all of our benchmark results were obtained using pre-production processors that did not yet support full DDR2-800 speed. Thus, the results show the basic performance difference between current Socket 939 systems at DDR400 speed and ideal CL2.0-2-2-5 1T timings, versus DDR2-667 at average CL4-4-4-12 timings.

This clearly cannot be seen as a direct performance comparison between the Socket 939 and the upcoming Socket AM2 platform, and does not reflect the final product's performance. Still, the results help us understand that DDR2-800 is required in order to match or slightly exceed the performance levels available with Athlon 64 architecture on DDR400 memory.

OpenGL

image018.gif

image020.gif

image061.gif

]]>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/407/primi-test-per-am2-ddr2-amd-mahRSS for NodeSat, 18 Jul 2026 07:01:11 GMTThu, 23 Feb 2006 23:28:39 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Primi test per AM2/DDR2 AMD.... mah... on Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:39:00 GMT]]>NF4 forever :D 😄

cmq aspetto test ufficiali seri per vedere sta cagata di ddr2, non si sa mai

]]>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/32161https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/32161Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:39:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Primi test per AM2/DDR2 AMD.... mah... on Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:43:15 GMT]]>esatto le 5400UL sono le uniche che vanno... x il resto... c'è da mettersi le mani nei capelli!

Per fortuna IMHO l'hanno ritardato a settembre... l'nf4 è un chipset che per gli amanti di AMD nn verrà mai dimenticato, sempre IMHO, per stabilità, compatibilità cn qualsiasi tipo di processore e ram... fenomenale!

]]>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/32160https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/32160Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:43:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Primi test per AM2/DDR2 AMD.... mah... on Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:40:33 GMT]]>aspettero' le ddr3 e poi cambio tutto :D

il mio opteron me lo tengo bello stretto ;) e pure questa mobo, non la cambierei per nulla al mondo (forse... :D )

]]>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/32159https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/32159Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:40:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Primi test per AM2/DDR2 AMD.... mah... on Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:36:48 GMT]]>mammamia.....ma dovevano proprio cambiare tutto oltre al soket?

tanto si sa...le ddr2 son na merda....

]]>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/32158https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/32158Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:36:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Primi test per AM2/DDR2 AMD.... mah... on Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:28:39 GMT]]>Non ci siamo ancora... le prestazioni sono peggiori dell'attuale piattaforma... causa degli schifosissimi timings delle ddr2...

Ecco l'articolo in inglese preso da Tom's Hardware:

Please note that all of our benchmark results were obtained using pre-production processors that did not yet support full DDR2-800 speed. Thus, the results show the basic performance difference between current Socket 939 systems at DDR400 speed and ideal CL2.0-2-2-5 1T timings, versus DDR2-667 at average CL4-4-4-12 timings.

This clearly cannot be seen as a direct performance comparison between the Socket 939 and the upcoming Socket AM2 platform, and does not reflect the final product's performance. Still, the results help us understand that DDR2-800 is required in order to match or slightly exceed the performance levels available with Athlon 64 architecture on DDR400 memory.

OpenGL

image018.gif

image020.gif

image061.gif

]]>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/32157https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/32157Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:28:39 GMT