<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[CORSAIR Force GT SSD 120GB SATA3 Hi-Speed Performance test with 3 Platforms]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Solid-State Hard Drive has been launched for years and performance is satisfied with most users.</p>
<p>In the past, it’s limited with SATA2 3Gb/s bandwidth, so the SSD performance hadn’t been improved for years.</p>
<p>SSD max performance in the past few years was just over 200MB/s.</p>
<p>During that time, there were many high end MBs supported SATA3, but the performance improvement was not much.</p>
<p>SSD performance bottleneck started to change from Jan 2011, Intel Sandy Bridge native support SATA3.</p>
<p>Although, AMD launched 990FX and A75 middle year also native support SATA3. </p>
<p>It makes SSD own higher bandwidth. SATA3 supports 6Gb/s is 2 times faster than SATA2.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT01.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT01.jpg" /></p>
<p>Currently, SSD has SATA2 and SATA3. SATA3 read write performance is over 300MB/s.</p>
<p>Windwithme previously share Intel 510 Series which support SATA3 450/220 MB/s SSD.</p>
<p>This review is another SATA3 SSD. The performance is different with Intel 510 SSD.</p>
<p>USA brand CORSAIR has variety product line which you can see its importance in SSD field.</p>
<p>This is CORSAIR latest product line, Force Series GT which use SandForce controller.</p>
<p>GT series packing is eye-catching red is different with Force Series black color.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT02.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT02.jpg" /></p>
<p>Content</p>
<p>Left side is Force GT 120GB and right side is black 3.5” adaptor and screws.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT03.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT03.jpg" /></p>
<p>Product is 2.5” and capacity is 120GB. Official spec with ATTO Disk Benchmark is 555/515 MB/s.</p>
<p>Random 4K max writing is 85000 IOPS. It’s almost SSD highest 4K spec.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT04.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT04.jpg" /></p>
<p>Besides the prominent black, the shell is matt metal surface texture.</p>
<p>CORSAIR provides 3 years warranty and capacity has 60/90/120/180/240/480G.</p>
<p>Users can choose SSD capacity by budget and demand.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT05.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT05.jpg" /></p>
<p>The back is black metal material. The hair-line surface design is really improving the texture.</p>
<p>Lower-Right is SATA3 and power connector. The outlook is same as SATA1 and SATA2. You have to distinguish by packing or sticker.</p>
<p>You can see other 2 silver laser stickers. It’s for warranty and internal hardware safety. I recommend you to keep it in origin.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT06.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT06.jpg" /></p>
<p>3.5” adaptor is very useful.</p>
<p>If you are using SSD in DeskTop PC, you can save money and time to find an extra one.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT07.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT07.jpg" /></p>
<p>Force GT uses SandForce latest SF-2281 controller which is very popular now.</p>
<p>CORSAIR has used in Force GT since June. It’s very early to use this controller/</p>
<p>For Force GT internal structure, you can find in Google. I will not share here.</p>
<p>Let’s start from desktop platform which uses GIGABYTE Z68X-UD3H-B3.</p>
<p>It provides 2 native white SATA3. This MB C/P value is good in Z68 market.</p>
<p>The price is a little lower than Z68 mainstream. It’s GIGABYTE new black design. It also includes most necessary spec.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT08.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT08.jpg" /></p>
<p>The chipset is Intel latest Z68. It bundles ISRT software to set HDD and SSD as RAID0 mode to make SSD as system accelerating cache.</p>
<p>According to small capacity SSD users, this is very good features. If SSD capacity is over 60GB, you can set it as drive C is better.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT09.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT09.jpg" /></p>
<p>Test Configuration</p>
<p>CPU: Intel Core i7-2700K</p>
<p>MB: GIGABYTE Z68X-UD3H-B3</p>
<p>DRAM: CORSAIR CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9R</p>
<p>VGA: Intel HD Graphics 3000</p>
<p>HD: CORSAIR Force Series GT 120GB / Intel 510 SERIES 120GB </p>
<p>POWER: Thermaltake TR2 450W</p>
<p>Cooler: Intel original cooler</p>
<p>OS: Windows7 Ultimate 64bit</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT10.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT10.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/23042/corsair-force-gt-ssd-120gb-sata3-hi-speed-performance-test-with-3-platforms</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:27:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/23042.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:10:52 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to CORSAIR Force GT SSD 120GB SATA3 Hi-Speed Performance test with 3 Platforms on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:12:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Very good Wind <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330594</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330594</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:12:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to CORSAIR Force GT SSD 120GB SATA3 Hi-Speed Performance test with 3 Platforms on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:20:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>good work!</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330593</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330593</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[RIC3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:20:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to CORSAIR Force GT SSD 120GB SATA3 Hi-Speed Performance test with 3 Platforms on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:09:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>IOMETER 2008</p>
<p>4KB Test - 100% Write / 100% Seupential</p>
<p>Total I/Os per Second 66899.10</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTA759.png" alt="CFORCEGTA759.png" /></p>
<p>AMD A75 SATA3 performance is a little lower than Intel Z68 mostly.</p>
<p>Comparing to formerly AMD chipset performance, A75 has been improved. The gap with Intel chipset is smaller.</p>
<p>AMD structure has no SSD accelerating mode. If you would like to use SSD, I recommend capacity is from 90 to 120GB.</p>
<p>Drive C, system drive, can use SSD and the data drive can use cheap 2TB HDD to build the ideal system.</p>
<p>Third platform is NoteBook, acer TimelineX 3830TG.</p>
<p>It’s Intel 2nd generation Core i and chipset is Intel HM65.</p>
<p>The first time I saw 3830TG was Computex. I am impressed by its appearance.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT14.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT14.jpg" /></p>
<p>Main tone is blue and the cover is aluminum. The thickness is under1 inch. It built in individual graphic and long duration battery.</p>
<p>The design is similar to business style. The CPU and 3D performance is mid-end above. It’s a kind of balance model.</p>
<p>3830TG price is also very parity. The weakness is 1.87Kg, a little bit heavy. However, it doesn’t impact the C/P value of this NB.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT15.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT15.jpg" /></p>
<p>CORSAIR Force Series GT 120GB install at SATA3 as system drive.</p>
<p>HD Tune Pro 4.60 Benchmark</p>
<p>Read - Average 458.5 MB/s Access Time 0.178ms</p>
<p>ATTO DISK Benchmark over 512k test, the max Read is 550.3 Mb/s and Write is 510.0 MB/s.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTNBSSD1.png" alt="CFORCEGTNBSSD1.png" /></p>
<p>File Benchmark over 2048k test, the Read can achieve almost 500 MB/s.</p>
<p>CrystalDiskMark </p>
<p> Read - 472.3 MB/s Write - 459.8 MB/s</p>
<p> Read - 478.9 MB/s Write - 450.2 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTNBSSD2.png" alt="CFORCEGTNBSSD2.png" /></p>
<p>AS SSD Benchmark - 423</p>
<p>Seq Read - 478.14 MB/s Write - 118.33 MB/s</p>
<p>4K-64Thrd Read - 107.38 MB/s Write - 121.99 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTNBSSD3.png" alt="CFORCEGTNBSSD3.png" /></p>
<p>Set Force GT as OS drive, you can see the performance drop a little, but it’s acceptable.</p>
<p>4K performance is much lower than PC. I hope 3830TG can improve it by updating BIOS.</p>
<p>NB SSD performance normally is lower than PC. However, Intel chipset still has the standard level for transferring performance.</p>
<p>BootRacer</p>
<p>Time to Logon 9 seconds</p>
<p>Time to Desktop 16 seconds</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTNBSSD4.png" alt="CFORCEGTNBSSD4.png" /></p>
<p>Maybe some readers think it’s just benchmark. They cannot feel the real performance.</p>
<p>I change 3830TG drive to TOSHIBA MK6461GSY 640GB 7200rpm and test the booting time.</p>
<p>BootRacer</p>
<p>Time to Logon 19 seconds</p>
<p>Time to Desktop 42 seconds</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTNBHDD.png" alt="CFORCEGTNBHDD.png" /></p>
<p>TOSHIBA 7200rpm 640GB HDD is 42 seconds and CORSAIR Force GT SSD 120GB is only 16 seconds.</p>
<p>OS are both Windows7 64bit SP1 with same drivers and software. Force GT speed is 2.63 times faster.</p>
<p>SSD is really helpful for NoteBook system performance. Formerly, NoteBook hardware spec is always much lower than PC.</p>
<p>Using SSD can improve system performance which you can feel since system bootup, shutdown and execute files.</p>
<p>In 2011, SATA3 spec becomes more popular and it improves SSD performance indirectly.</p>
<p>Formerly, entry 32GB SSD price can get 64GB now. User also can have bigger capacity.</p>
<p>64GB mid-end SSD market now goes for 128GB due to the price drop.</p>
<p>SSD capacity and price cannot be comparing with HDD. However, they are looking for different applications.</p>
<p>By the other hand, 128GB in PC platform can be drive C, system drive and replace HDD in NteBook.</p>
<p>This year, SSD price drop make user have higher capacity and the applications are wider.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT16.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT16.jpg" /></p>
<p>For SATA3 SSD, there are several types of controllers.</p>
<p>However, many SATA3 SSD Write speed is only 200~300 MB/s.</p>
<p>CORSAIR Force GT uses SandForce SF-2281 controller chip, the max Write can achieve over 500 MB/s.</p>
<p>For 4K performance, it’s almost the best solution in current SSD structure. It’s a very good controller in SATA3 SSD.</p>
<p>Force GT appearance is eye-catching and good texture. The capacity has 60~480GB for users to choose.</p>
<p>Plus CORSAIR has good reputation in after service and firmware update, you must put this model in your new SSD wish list.</p>
<p>Above Force GT benchmark is for your reference. <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
<p>This article is also post in my blog <a href="http://www.wretch.cc/blog/windwithme">WIND3C</a> , Welcome your comments.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330592</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330592</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 04:09:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to CORSAIR Force GT SSD 120GB SATA3 Hi-Speed Performance test with 3 Platforms on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:29:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Formerly, AMD chipset IO performance is always lower than Intel. The SATA transfer rate is also lower.</p>
<p>A75 is parity product which native support SATA3 and USB3.0. It’s APU advantage so far.</p>
<p>I hope the native SATA3 chipset can enhance AMD platform transfer performance.</p>
<p> <img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT12.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT12.jpg" /></p>
<p>Test Configuration</p>
<p>CPU: AMD A8-3850</p>
<p>MB: GIGABYTE A75M-S2V</p>
<p>DRAM: CORSAIR CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9R</p>
<p>VGA: AMD Radeon HD6550D</p>
<p>HD: CORSAIR Force Series GT 120GB / Intel 510 SERIES 120GB </p>
<p>POWER: Thermaltake TR2 450W</p>
<p>Cooler: Thermaltake BigTyp 14Pro</p>
<p>OS: Windows7 Ultimate 64bit</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT13.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT13.jpg" /></p>
<p>CORSAIR Force Series GT 120GB install at blue SATA3.</p>
<p>Non-OS driver is without any data.</p>
<p>HD Tune Pro 4.61 Benchmark</p>
<p>Read - Average 509.8 MB/s Access Time 0.127ms</p>
<p>Write - Average 400.9 MB/s Access Time 0.181ms</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTA751.png" alt="CFORCEGTA751.png" /></p>
<p>Random Access</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTA752.png" alt="CFORCEGTA752.png" /></p>
<p>Extra tests</p>
<p>Sequential middle </p>
<p>Read - 413.582 MB/s</p>
<p>Write - 411.701 MB/s</p>
<p>Random seek 4KB 29152 IOPS</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTA753.png" alt="CFORCEGTA753.png" /></p>
<p>File Benchmark over 2048k test, the Read is over 500 MB/s.</p>
<p>ATTO DISK Benchmark over 512k test, the max Read is 546.5 Mb/s and Write is 505.2 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTA754.png" alt="CFORCEGTA754.png" /></p>
<p>ADIA64 Read Test Suite - Linear Read(Middle) 527.9 MB/s</p>
<p>SSD Benchmark TOTAL 3926.22</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTA755.png" alt="CFORCEGTA755.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalDiskMark </p>
<p>Seq Read - 515.9 MB/s Write - 136.6 MB/s</p>
<p> Read - 511.2 MB/s Write - 494.3 MB/s</p>
<p> Read - 510.0 MB/s Write - 495.1 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTA756.png" alt="CFORCEGTA756.png" /></p>
<p>ADIA64 Linear Read Average 500.1 MB/s</p>
<p>AS SSD Benchmark - 462</p>
<p>Seq Read - 505.29 MB/s Write - 78.69 MB/s</p>
<p>4K-64Thrd Read - 118.10 MB/s Write - 96.63 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTA757.png" alt="CFORCEGTA757.png" /></p>
<p>AS SSD Benchmark</p>
<p>4K-64Thrd Read - 30232 iops Write - 24738 iops </p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTA758.png" alt="CFORCEGTA758.png" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330591</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330591</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:29:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to CORSAIR Force GT SSD 120GB SATA3 Hi-Speed Performance test with 3 Platforms on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:24:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>CORSAIR Force Series GT 120GB install at SATA3.</p>
<p>Non-OS driver is without any data.</p>
<p>HD Tune Pro 4.61 Benchmark</p>
<p>Read - Average 519.6 MB/s Access Time 0.113ms</p>
<p>Write - Average 337.2 MB/s Access Time 0.183ms</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTZ681.png" alt="CFORCEGTZ681.png" /></p>
<p>Random Access</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTZ682.png" alt="CFORCEGTZ682.png" /></p>
<p>Extra tests</p>
<p>Sequential middle </p>
<p>Read - 413.582 MB/s</p>
<p>Write - 421.780 MB/s</p>
<p>Random seek 4KB 34451 IOPS</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTZ683.png" alt="CFORCEGTZ683.png" /></p>
<p>File Benchmark over 1024k test, the Read is over500 MB/s.</p>
<p>ATTO DISK Benchmark over 32k test, the max Read is 560.5 Mb/s and Write is 500.0 MB/s.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTZ684.png" alt="CFORCEGTZ684.png" /></p>
<p>ADIA64 Read Test Suite - Linear Read(Middle) 527.0 MB/s</p>
<p>SSD Benchmark TOTAL 4310.19</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTZ685.png" alt="CFORCEGTZ685.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalDiskMark </p>
<p>Seq Read - 513.6 MB/s Write - 145.6 MB/s</p>
<p> Read - 533.2 MB/s Write - 488.3 MB/s</p>
<p> Read - 533.7 MB/s Write - 489.2 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTZ686.png" alt="CFORCEGTZ686.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalDiskMark default test is random. You can see the Write performance is lower.</p>
<p>This is because of SandForce controller structure. The algorithm will be lower in this software default mode.</p>
<p>On the left hand side, CrystalDiskMark change to sequence mode, the Write performance is close to official spec.</p>
<p>ADIA64 Linear Read Average 522.7 MB/s</p>
<p>AS SSD Benchmark - 491</p>
<p>Seq Read - 510.75 MB/s Write - 111.09 MB/s</p>
<p>4K-64Thrd Read - 106.48 MB/s Write - 116.18 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTZ687.png" alt="CFORCEGTZ687.png" /></p>
<p>AS SSD Benchmark in Seq Write is similar to CrystalDiskMark.</p>
<p>However, this software doesn’t provide sequence mode to test.</p>
<p>AS SSD Benchmark</p>
<p>4K-64Thrd Read - 27259 iops Write - 29741 iops </p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTZ688.png" alt="CFORCEGTZ688.png" /></p>
<p>In Compression-Benchmark, you can see the Read speed is very stable.</p>
<p>Write curve is climbing from 150 MB/s to 470 MB/s.</p>
<p>IOMETER 2008</p>
<p>4KB Test - 100% Write / 100% Seupential</p>
<p>Total I/Os per Second 86253.69</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGTZ689.png" alt="CFORCEGTZ689.png" /></p>
<p>4K Write in IOMETER 2008 test can achieve 86K IOPS which is higher than official spec 85K.</p>
<p>4K performance is key strength of SandForce controller. This transfer rate is the best in the current market.</p>
<p>Force GT bundle Z68 platform almost can reach the highest speed except some software cannot unleash real SandForce Write performance.</p>
<p>Even Z68 chipset, different MB have the performance gap. You have to beware of it.</p>
<p>2nd desktop PC test is GIGABYTE A75M-S2V.</p>
<p>APU structure is AMD latest key product. A75 chipset provides 6 SATA3 and the scalability is better.</p>
<p>I use same brand MB to avoid other factors to impact SSD performance besides chipset.</p>
<p> <img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT11.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT11.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330590</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330590</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:24:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to CORSAIR Force GT SSD 120GB SATA3 Hi-Speed Performance test with 3 Platforms on Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:10:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Solid-State Hard Drive has been launched for years and performance is satisfied with most users.</p>
<p>In the past, it’s limited with SATA2 3Gb/s bandwidth, so the SSD performance hadn’t been improved for years.</p>
<p>SSD max performance in the past few years was just over 200MB/s.</p>
<p>During that time, there were many high end MBs supported SATA3, but the performance improvement was not much.</p>
<p>SSD performance bottleneck started to change from Jan 2011, Intel Sandy Bridge native support SATA3.</p>
<p>Although, AMD launched 990FX and A75 middle year also native support SATA3. </p>
<p>It makes SSD own higher bandwidth. SATA3 supports 6Gb/s is 2 times faster than SATA2.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT01.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT01.jpg" /></p>
<p>Currently, SSD has SATA2 and SATA3. SATA3 read write performance is over 300MB/s.</p>
<p>Windwithme previously share Intel 510 Series which support SATA3 450/220 MB/s SSD.</p>
<p>This review is another SATA3 SSD. The performance is different with Intel 510 SSD.</p>
<p>USA brand CORSAIR has variety product line which you can see its importance in SSD field.</p>
<p>This is CORSAIR latest product line, Force Series GT which use SandForce controller.</p>
<p>GT series packing is eye-catching red is different with Force Series black color.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT02.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT02.jpg" /></p>
<p>Content</p>
<p>Left side is Force GT 120GB and right side is black 3.5” adaptor and screws.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT03.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT03.jpg" /></p>
<p>Product is 2.5” and capacity is 120GB. Official spec with ATTO Disk Benchmark is 555/515 MB/s.</p>
<p>Random 4K max writing is 85000 IOPS. It’s almost SSD highest 4K spec.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT04.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT04.jpg" /></p>
<p>Besides the prominent black, the shell is matt metal surface texture.</p>
<p>CORSAIR provides 3 years warranty and capacity has 60/90/120/180/240/480G.</p>
<p>Users can choose SSD capacity by budget and demand.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT05.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT05.jpg" /></p>
<p>The back is black metal material. The hair-line surface design is really improving the texture.</p>
<p>Lower-Right is SATA3 and power connector. The outlook is same as SATA1 and SATA2. You have to distinguish by packing or sticker.</p>
<p>You can see other 2 silver laser stickers. It’s for warranty and internal hardware safety. I recommend you to keep it in origin.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT06.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT06.jpg" /></p>
<p>3.5” adaptor is very useful.</p>
<p>If you are using SSD in DeskTop PC, you can save money and time to find an extra one.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT07.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT07.jpg" /></p>
<p>Force GT uses SandForce latest SF-2281 controller which is very popular now.</p>
<p>CORSAIR has used in Force GT since June. It’s very early to use this controller/</p>
<p>For Force GT internal structure, you can find in Google. I will not share here.</p>
<p>Let’s start from desktop platform which uses GIGABYTE Z68X-UD3H-B3.</p>
<p>It provides 2 native white SATA3. This MB C/P value is good in Z68 market.</p>
<p>The price is a little lower than Z68 mainstream. It’s GIGABYTE new black design. It also includes most necessary spec.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT08.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT08.jpg" /></p>
<p>The chipset is Intel latest Z68. It bundles ISRT software to set HDD and SSD as RAID0 mode to make SSD as system accelerating cache.</p>
<p>According to small capacity SSD users, this is very good features. If SSD capacity is over 60GB, you can set it as drive C is better.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT09.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT09.jpg" /></p>
<p>Test Configuration</p>
<p>CPU: Intel Core i7-2700K</p>
<p>MB: GIGABYTE Z68X-UD3H-B3</p>
<p>DRAM: CORSAIR CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9R</p>
<p>VGA: Intel HD Graphics 3000</p>
<p>HD: CORSAIR Force Series GT 120GB / Intel 510 SERIES 120GB </p>
<p>POWER: Thermaltake TR2 450W</p>
<p>Cooler: Intel original cooler</p>
<p>OS: Windows7 Ultimate 64bit</p>
<p><img src="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2011/CFORCEGT/CFORCEGT10.jpg" alt="CFORCEGT10.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330589</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/330589</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:10:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>