<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[[Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>CPU AMD Bulldozer</strong></p>
<img src="http://www.xtremeshack.com/immagine/i113766_amd-fx-cpu-logo.jpg" alt="i113766_amd-fx-cpu-logo.jpg" />
<p><img src="http://www.xtremehardware.com/images/stories/AMD/Bulldozer_Preview/anteprima.png" alt="anteprima.png" /></p>
<p>Bulldozer è la prima CPU con 8-core. Questi core non sono in realtà completi ma AMD è riuscita ad inserirli in un die a 32nm grazie allo sharing di alcuni componenti meno utilizzati tra due core, che ora costituiscono un modulo. Il sistema vede quindi 8-core fisici ed 8 logici, ma alcuni processi saranno rallentati per via delle risorse condivise. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.xtremehardware.com/images/stories/AMD/Bulldozer_Preview/4.png" alt="4.png" /></p>
<p>In particolare AMD ha scelto di replicare per ogni core l'unità di elaborazione degli interi, lasciando condivisa invece l'unità floating point. Questa scelta è principalmente dovuta alla grande diffusione del calcolo su GPU, in cui le unità elaborative dedicate ai calcoli floating point sono molto più numerose e veloci, rendendo di fatto la CPU, del tutto inutile per questi processi. E' ovviamente una visione a lungo termine, verso cui AMD si sta preparando, anticipando i tempi. </p>
<p>Allo stato attuale le prestazioni di bulldozer risultano quindi deludenti, specialmente in single threading. In multithreading le CPU top di gamma si posizionano all'altezza della controparte intel quad-core con Hyper threading.</p>
<p>Per un'analisi più approfondita della nostra architettura vi rimandiamo al nostro articolo: <a href="http://www.xtremehardware.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=5855">AMD Bulldozer al debutto: analisi dell</a></p>
<p><strong>Gamma CPU Bulldozer:</strong></p>
<p>FX-8150: otto core, 3,6 GHz CPU di base (3,9 GHz Turbo core, 4,2 GHz Max Turbo), 245$</p>
<p>FX-8120: otto core, 3,1 GHz CPU di base (3,4 GHz Core Turbo, 4.0 GHz Max Turbo), 205$</p>
<p>FX-6100: sei core, 3,3 GHz CPU di base (3,6 GHz Turbo core, 3,9 GHz Max Turbo), 165 </p>
<p>FX-4100: quattro core, 3,6 GHz CPU di base (3,7 GHz Turbo core, 3,8 GHz Max Turbo), 115$</p>
<p><strong>Test dalla rete in attesa dei test della nostra redazione</strong></p>
<p><strong>Consumi</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.xtremeshack.com/scheda/113780_consumi-full-bit-tech.jpg.html"><img src="http://www.xtremeshack.com/immagine/t113780_consumi-full-bit-tech.jpg" alt="t113780_consumi-full-bit-tech.jpg" /></a> <a href="http://www.xtremeshack.com/scheda/113781_consumi-idle-bit-tech.jpg.html"><img src="http://www.xtremeshack.com/immagine/t113781_consumi-idle-bit-tech.jpg" alt="t113781_consumi-idle-bit-tech.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Le tecniche di power gating e clock gating mostrano un ottimo comportamento in idle. Nonostante i 32nm i consumi sono comunque importanti in full load, specialmente in overclock </p>
<p>(bit-tech)</p>
<p><strong>Single-threading</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.xtremeshack.com/scheda/113788_cinebench-anandtech.png.html"><img src="http://www.xtremeshack.com/immagine/t113788_cinebench-anandtech.png" alt="t113788_cinebench-anandtech.png" /></a> <a href="http://www.xtremeshack.com/scheda/113791_turbo-in-azione-con-cinebench.jpg.html"><img src="http://www.xtremeshack.com/immagine/t113791_turbo-in-azione-con-cinebench.jpg" alt="t113791_turbo-in-azione-con-cinebench.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Massimizzare il throughput della CPU può portare a volte scarsi risultati con le applicazioni che non supportano il multithreading</p>
<p><strong>Multi-Threading</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.xtremeshack.com/scheda/113796_cinebench-bit-tech.jpg.html"><img src="http://www.xtremeshack.com/immagine/t113796_cinebench-bit-tech.jpg" alt="t113796_cinebench-bit-tech.jpg" /></a> <a href="http://www.xtremeshack.com/scheda/113797_wpime-bit-tech.jpg.html"><img src="http://www.xtremeshack.com/immagine/t113797_wpime-bit-tech.jpg" alt="t113797_wpime-bit-tech.jpg" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Giochi</strong></p>
<p>Nonostante l'annuncio fatto nelle slide AMD, le prestazioni nei giochi, nelle configurazioni CPU limited, restano a favore di Sandy Bridge</p>
<p><img src="http://www.tomshw.it/files/2011/10/immagini/33899/f1-2011-1680_t.png" alt="f1-2011-1680_t.png" /><img src="http://www.tomshw.it/files/2011/10/immagini/33899/f1-2011-1920_t.png" alt="f1-2011-1920_t.png" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.tomshw.it/files/2011/10/immagini/33899/wow-1680_t.png" alt="wow-1680_t.png" /><img src="http://www.tomshw.it/files/2011/10/immagini/33899/wow-1920_t.png" alt="wow-1920_t.png" /></p>
<p><img src="http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4955/41709.png" alt="41709.png" /></p>
<p><img src="http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4955/41701.png" alt="41701.png" /></p>
<p><img src="http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4955/41707.png" alt="41707.png" /></p>
<p><img src="http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4955/41703.png" alt="41703.png" /></p>
<p><strong>Overclock daily use</strong></p>
<p>tra 4,6ghz e 4,9 ghz ma necessita di buon sistema di raffreddamento</p>
<p><strong>Overclock estremo e bench</strong></p>
<p>World record assoluto di frequenza con Elio liquido</p>
<p><img src="http://www.xtremehardware.com/images/stories/news/bulldozer-record-8429mhz_t.jpg" alt="bulldozer-record-8429mhz_t.jpg" /></p>
<p>6,8 GHz con ghiaccio secco:</p>
<p> [video=youtube;OWWUF-7LuqU]
</p>
<div contenteditable="false"><div><iframe width="459" height="344" src="//www.xtremehardware.com/forum/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" frameborder="0" allow="encrypted-media" data-embed-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/OWWUF-7LuqU?feature=oembed"></iframe></div></div>"]
<div contenteditable="false"><div><iframe width="459" height="344" src="//www.xtremehardware.com/forum/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" frameborder="0" allow="encrypted-media" data-embed-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/OWWUF-7LuqU?feature=oembed"></iframe></div></div> <p>6 GHz con Phase Change:</p>
<div contenteditable="false"><div><iframe width="459" height="344" src="//www.xtremehardware.com/forum/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" frameborder="0" allow="encrypted-media" data-embed-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7QWh2D9Tgh8?feature=oembed"></iframe></div></div>"]
<div contenteditable="false"><div><iframe width="459" height="344" src="//www.xtremehardware.com/forum/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" frameborder="0" allow="encrypted-media" data-embed-src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7QWh2D9Tgh8?feature=oembed"></iframe></div></div>
<p>spiraglio al 3dmark11 in oc (sopra a sandy) da overclockersclub:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.xtremeshack.com/immagine/i113774_3dmark11-extreme-preset-oc.png" alt="i113774_3dmark11-extreme-preset-oc.png" /></p>
<p><strong>Reviews XtremeHardware:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.xtremehardware.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=5855">AMD BULLDOZER AL DEBUTTO: ANALISI DELL’ARCHITETTURA</a></p>
<p><strong>Reviews online</strong></p>
<p>Tom'sHW.it: <a href="http://www.tomshw.it/cont/articolo/recensione-amd-fx-8150-bulldozer-delude-la-strada-e-ancora-lunga/33899/1.html">Recensione AMD FX-8150: Bulldozer delude, la strada è ancora lunga</a></p>
<p>HwUpgrade: <a href="http://www.hwupgrade.it/articoli/cpu/2997/amd-fx-8150-al-debutto-le-soluzioni-bulldozer_index.html">AMD FX-8150: al debutto le soluzioni Bulldozer</a></p>
<p>Bit-tech: <a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2011/10/12/amd-fx-8150-review/1">AMD FX-8150 Review</a></p>
<p>Anandtech: <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/4955/the-bulldozer-review-amd-fx8150-tested">The Bulldozer Review: AMD FX-8150 Tested</a></p>
<p>Guru3D:<a href="http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx-8150-processor-review/">AMD FX 8150 processor review</a></p>
<p>OverclockersClub: <a href="http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/amd_fx8150/">AMD FX-8150 Review</a></p>
<p>LegitReviews: <a href="http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1741/1/">AMD FX-8150 Processor Review - Bulldozer Arrives</a></p>
<p>BenchmarkReviews: <a href="http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=831&amp;Itemid=63">AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer CPU Review</a></p>
<p>altre qui: <a href="http://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/f13/thread_ufficiale_amd_bulldozer_fx_8xxx_fx_6xxx_fx_%20%204xxx-28063/#post335972">http://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/f13/thread_ufficiale_amd_bulldozer_fx_8xxx_fx_6xxx_fx_  4xxx-28063/#post335972</a></p>
<p><em><span style="text-decoration:underline">Work in progress!</span></em></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/22415/thread-ufficiale-amd-bulldozer-fx-8xxx-fx-6xxx-fx-4xxx</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 20:24:15 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/22415.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:19:05 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:10:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>si vero</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321854</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321854</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:10:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:05:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, sono curioso di vedere come si comportano.. anche perché il 6300 a 120 euro sembra ottimo <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321853</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321853</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fab]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:05:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:50:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>ancora presto.</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321852</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321852</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:50:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:12:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ragazzi qualche opinione sul 6300 e sul 4300 ?</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321851</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321851</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fab]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:12:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:25:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>che non vedremo mai.</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321850</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321850</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:25:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:01:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>apix_1024 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Problemi di alimentazione? Xke dici impossibile? 
<p>amatore di patatine v2</p>
<p>gt-i9300</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Per come è disegnato il socket AM3+ e quindi tutto quello che ci stà intorno, alimentazione in primis, non è fisicamente possibile gestire 16 core, a meno non li riduci a 14nm... e comunque poi ci sono ulteriori complicazioni a livello strutturale per la mobo e relativo socket.</p>
<p>Purtroppo ci vuole un socket nuovo...</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321849</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321849</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Labview]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:01:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:00:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>più di implementazione e produzione.</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321848</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321848</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 07:00:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 05:31:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Labview ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Su AM3+ impossibile..</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Problemi di alimentazione? Xke dici impossibile? </p>
<p>amatore di patatine v2</p>
<p>gt-i9300</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321847</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321847</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[apix_1024]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 05:31:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:05:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>apix_1024 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>a quando un 12/16 core?? <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" />
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Su AM3+ impossibile..</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321846</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321846</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Labview]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:05:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:49:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>a quando un 12/16 core?? <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321845</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321845</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[apix_1024]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:49:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:42:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>tempo fa ho acquistato un fx 8150 e con i giochi era una sola anche se in oc saliva bene,adesso ho un fx 6100 95w come in firma 4.4ghz e una 5770 hawk,gioco tranquillamente a bf3,need for speed most wanted 2012 settati in high,a differenza del 8150 non fa collo di bottiglia con la vga e va molto meglio</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321844</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321844</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[xtremer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:42:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:14:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>apix_1024 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>se faceste una rece e dovesse andare bene io vi compro un FX 8x00 <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" />
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /> chissà <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321843</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321843</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:14:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:53:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>se faceste una rece e dovesse andare bene io vi compro un FX 8x00 <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321842</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321842</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[apix_1024]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:53:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:02:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Tex ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>son contento cosi ora, brutto inscimmiatore che non sei altro!!!<p>ahahahahahaha</p>
<p>dai fateci una rece e una sessione di OC, curioso di vedere quanto rende a parita di prezzo confrontandolo con cpu della stessa fascia di prezzo..</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/afro.gif.17de86fe34bff2b0b91da1f54c9b3376.gif" alt="O0" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321841</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321841</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 08:02:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:54:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>son contento cosi ora, brutto inscimmiatore che non sei altro!!!</p>
<p>ahahahahahaha</p>
<p>dai fateci una rece e una sessione di OC, curioso di vedere quanto rende a parita di prezzo confrontandolo con cpu della stessa fascia di prezzo..</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321840</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321840</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:54:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:44:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Tex ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>no...</div>
</blockquote>
<p>siiiiiiiii............ <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321839</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321839</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:44:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:38:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>no...</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321838</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321838</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:38:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:12:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Tex ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>ogge le ho viste in vendita.. proprio curioso di vedere come vanno!!</div>
</blockquote>
<p>predisponi un nuovo ordine <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321837</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321837</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:12:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:39:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>ogge le ho viste in vendita.. proprio curioso di vedere come vanno!!</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321836</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321836</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:39:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:36:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Be' speriamo anche se a differenza dei tempi quando recensii bulldozer alias FX-8150 dove non avevo azoto, adesso ne ho ma la sfiga vuole che non sale come il precedente step. Speriamo in bene...</p>
<p>Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321835</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321835</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Voiager]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:36:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:14:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>e gran oc</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321834</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321834</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:14:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:33:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Visto, sta sfornando proprio degli ottimi prodotti MSI ultimamente</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321833</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321833</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Voiager]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:33:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Thu, 25 Oct 2012 06:09:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>visto <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321832</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321832</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 06:09:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to [Thread Ufficiale] AMD Bulldozer FX-8xxx FX-6xxx FX-4xxx on Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:57:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Comunicato MSI per la compatibilità Vishera</p>
<p><strong>MSI AM3+ mainboards are ready </strong></p>
<p><strong>      for the new 2012 AMD FX Processor</strong></p>
<p>     <strong>Get a incredible performance boost with MSI’s OC Genie</strong></p>
<p>     The world renowned mainboard  manufacturer MSI announced that once the BIOS of MSI AM3+ mainboards  have been updated, they will support newest 2012 FX Processor (Vishera).  When used with MSI’s exclusive OC Genie one-second overclock  technology, the performance of the 2012 AMD FX Processor can be easy  increased!</p>
<p> MSI’s excellent R&amp;D skills allow users to enjoy faster performance  and experience the newest technologies. This is done by simply updating  the BIOS to support new 2012 AMD FX Processor without having to buy a  new compatible mainboard which proves that purchasing MSI mainboards is a  safe choice.</p>
<p> List of models that support the new 2012 AMD FX Processor (Vishera)</p>
<p><a href="http://event.msi.com/mb/2012/vishera/">http://event.msi.com/mb/2012/vishera/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321831</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/321831</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Labview]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:57:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>