<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Questo è l'annuncio ufficiale di Intel riguardo questo bug dei chipset per piattaforme Sandy Bridge che dovrebbe causare la degradazione delle prestazioni dei controller SATA .</p>
<p><a href="http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2011/01/31/intel-identifies-chipset-design-error-implementing-solution">Intel Identifies Chipset Design Error, Implementing Solution</a></p>
<p><a href="http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2011/01/31/intel-identifies-chipset-design-error-implementing-solution">[/url]<blockquote>
<div>
<p>SANTA CLARA' date=' Calif., Jan. 31, 2011 - As part  of ongoing quality assurance, Intel Corporation has discovered a design  issue in a recently released support chip, the Intel<img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="®" alt="®" /> 6 Series,  code-named Cougar Point, and has implemented a silicon fix. In some  cases, the Serial-ATA (SATA) ports within the chipsets may degrade over  time, potentially impacting the performance or functionality of  SATA-linked devices such as hard disk drives and DVD-drives. The chipset  is utilized in PCs with Intel's latest Second Generation Intel Core  processors, code-named Sandy Bridge. Intel has stopped shipment of the  affected support chip from its factories. Intel has corrected the design  issue, and has begun manufacturing a new version of the support chip  which will resolve the issue. The Sandy Bridge microprocessor is  unaffected and no other products are affected by this issue.</p>
<p>The company  expects to begin delivering the updated version of the chipset to  customers in late February and expects full volume recovery in April.  Intel stands behind its products and is committed to product quality.  For computer makers and other Intel customers that have bought  potentially affected chipsets or systems, Intel will work with its OEM  partners to accept the return of the affected chipsets, and plans to  support modifications or replacements needed on motherboards or systems.  The systems with the affected support chips have only been shipping  since January 9th and the company believes that relatively  few consumers are impacted by this issue. The only systems sold to an  end customer potentially impacted are Second Generation Core i5 and Core  i7 quad core based systems. Intel believes that consumers can continue  to use their systems with confidence, while working with their computer  manufacturer for a permanent solution. For further information consumers  should contact Intel at <a href="http://www.intel.com/">www.intel.com on the  support page or contact their OEM manufacturer.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.intel.com/"> </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.intel.com/">For the first quarter of 2011,  Intel expects this issue to reduce revenue by approximately $300  million as the company discontinues production of the current version of  the chipset and begins manufacturing the new version. Full-year revenue  is not expected to be materially affected by the issue. Total cost to  repair and replace affected materials and systems in the market is  estimated to be $700 million. Since this issue affected some of the  chipset units shipped and produced in the fourth quarter of 2010, the  company will take a charge against cost of goods sold, which is expected  to reduce the fourth quarter gross margin percentage by approximately 4  percentage points from the previously reported 67.5 percent. The  company will also take a charge in the first quarter of 2011which will  lower the previously communicated gross margin percentage by 2  percentage points and the full-year gross margin percentage by one  percentage point.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.intel.com/"> </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.intel.com/"> </a></p>
</div>
</blockquote></a><a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?p=irol-eventDetails&amp;c=131837&amp;eventID=3711144"></a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/18453/bug-nei-chipset-per-sandy-bridge</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:23:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/18453.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:00:44 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:21:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>bene bene</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262889</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262889</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gianni1879]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:21:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:08:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>SANTA CLARA, Calif., Feb. 7, 2011 – On  January 31, 2011, Intel <a href="http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2011/01/31/intel-identifies-chipset-design-error-implementing-solution">disclosed  a design issue with a support chip</a>, the Intel<img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="®" alt="®" /> 6 Series Chipset  that has the potential to impact certain PC system configurations. Intel  subsequently initiated extensive discussions with computer makers about  this topic. Both Intel and its customers are focused on delivering the  highest quality PC systems based on Intel<img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="®" alt="®" /> 2nd  Generation Core<img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="®" alt="®" /> Processors. As a result of these discussions and  specific requests from computer makers, Intel is resuming shipments of  the Intel<img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="®" alt="®" /> 6 Series Chipset for use only in PC system configurations  that are not impacted by the design issue.</p>
<p>Only computer makers who have  committed to shipping the Intel<img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="®" alt="®" /> 6 Series Chipset in PC system  configurations that are not impacted by the design issue will be  receiving these shipments.</p>
<p>This resumption of shipments of the Intel<img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="®" alt="®" /> 6  Series Chipset is not changing the company’s updated first quarter 2011  and full-year financial Outlook published on January 31st.</p>
<p>In  parallel, Intel has started manufacturing on a new version of this  support chip.  Intel now expects to begin shipping the new parts in mid  February.</p>
<p><a href="http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2011/02/07/intel-provides-update-on-support-chip-design-issue">http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2011/02/07/intel-provides-update-on-support-chip-design-issue</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262888</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262888</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[One1ros]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:08:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:29:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Effettivamente la situazione non è cosi' tragica...</p>
<p>il bug c'è ed effettivamente la scheda viene venduta per avere 4 o6 porte sata 2 funzionanti..</p>
<p>ritengo comunque che il 90% degli utenti non debba allarmarsi per la presenza di questo bug....</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262887</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262887</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Le085]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:29:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:24:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ragazzi ho letto che qualcuno dice ancora che sul controller Intel non si può attaccare niente.</p>
<p>Non è così...Le porte SATA 3 (6Gbps) sono tutte utilizzabili, siano esse su controller Intel o su controller Marvell e sono ovviamente retro-compatibili.</p>
<p>Giusto per farvi un esempio, la MSI P67A-GD65 ha 4 porte 6Gbps ovvero SATA 1-2 (by Intel) e SATA 7-8 (by Marvell) caratterizzate tutte dal colore bianco dei connettori.</p>
<p>Potrete tranquillamente utilizzare quelle Intel 6Gbps in quanto il problema riguarda appunto il chip SATA 2 Intel, anzi, in caso di Raid sono consigliabili le porte Intel in quanto come sappiamo sono più performanti in raid di quelle Marvell.</p>
<p>Io ad esempio monterò due ssd in raid sulle porte 1-2 e un hd e lettore sulle porte 7-8.</p>
<p>Il problema comunque, secondo Intel, si manifesterebbe dopo alcuni anni di utilizzo.</p>
<p>Le schede madri per ora non sono in vendita ma, entro fine mese, le varie case produttrici offriranno un servizio gratuito ai vari utenti per sostituire le schede buggate con altre fixate. Torneranno sul mercato ad Aprile. Se non volete attendere oltre potrete chiedere un rimborso.. <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262886</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262886</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[j0h]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:24:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:50:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Sembrerebbe di si,</p>
<p>del resto se leggi <a href="http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2011/01/31/intel-identifies-chipset-design-error-implementing-solution">qui</a> Intel fa un resoconto dettagliato di quello che è successo e di come sta affrontando il problema.</p>
<p>Dovrebbe, con la dovuta serietà, ritirare le shede madre coinvolte nel problema e sostituirle con quelle diciamo "buone".</p>
<p>Del resto il problema venuto fuori è enorme, si parla di circa 700 Milioni $.</p>
<p>I chip interessati (difettosi) sono quelli x capirci prodotti nell'ultimo quadrimestre del 2010.</p>
<p>Il bug è talmente profondo che ha richiesto la progettazione ex-novo del chip.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262885</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262885</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Voiager]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:50:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:18:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ho provato ad utilizzare questo software per la mia mobo e mi diceva che era sconsigliato l`utilizzo delle porte SATA2...stiamo parlando di una P8P67 EVO...questo vuol dire che il chipset e` difettoso? Penso che sia da interpretare cosi!</p>
<p>Voi che ne pensate?</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262884</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262884</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kratos1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:18:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:03:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Io credo che se Gigabyte non ha messo delle limitazioni x evitare di usare tale software su altre mobo di altri brand non vedo xkè non debba funzionare.</p>
<p>Cmq l'unica cosa è provare <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/wink.png.981122a168c49b836247b5559b1cdcb0.png" alt=";)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262883</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262883</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Voiager]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:03:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:02:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>si funziona anche con le schede di altri produttori;</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262882</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262882</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[valerio1111]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:02:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:48:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Secondo voi questo tool funziona su mobo non gigabyte?</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262881</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262881</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kratos1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:48:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Mon, 07 Feb 2011 23:07:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Software di gigabyte per determinare se il vostro chipset è affetto dal bug. </p>
<p>Qui la news: <a href="http://www.xtremehardware.com/news/hardware/gigabyte-rilascia-un-tool-per-verificare-la-presenza-del-bug-o-meno-nei-chipset-201102074741/">Gigabyte rilascia un tool per verificare la presenza del bug o meno nei chipset</a></p>
<p>Qui il download: <a href="http://www.gigabyte.com/support-downloads/utility.aspx?cg=2">http://www.gigabyte.com/support-downloads/utility.aspx?cg=2</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262880</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262880</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[One1ros]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 23:07:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:18:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Gigabyte ha creato una guida per gli utenti in merito a questa incresciosa situazione: <a href="http://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/../../../news/hardware/comunicato-gigabyte:-come-gestire-le-motherboards-con-chipset-intel-serie-6-stepping-b2-201102024723/">http://www.xtremehardware.com/news/hardware/comunicato-gigabyte:-come-gestire-le-motherboards-con-chipset-intel-serie-6-stepping-b2-201102024723/</a></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262879</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262879</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[One1ros]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:18:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:57:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ed ecco che anche ASus corre ai ripari, qui la lista e i numeri per l'assistenza</p>
<p><a href="http://event.asus.com/2011/SandyBridge/notice/">Proactively responding to the Intel-identified Sandy Bridge chipset design error</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262878</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262878</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:57:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:21:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>bella  battuta d'arresto...</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262877</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262877</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devil_Mcry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:21:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:36:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Le case produttrici stanno progressivamente proclamando gli annunci ufficiali anche se in verità sono tutte in attesa della strategia di Intel.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/f64/msi_blocca_le_spedizioni_di_intel_sandy_bridge-23459">MSI blocca le spedizioni di Intel Sandy Bridge - Xtreme Hardware Forum</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262876</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262876</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[One1ros]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:36:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:11:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Milliwatt che costeranno parecchio <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262875</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262875</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lowenz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 19:11:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:24:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>gianni1879 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/4143/the-source-of-intels-cougar-point-sata-bug">The Source of Intel's Cougar Point SATA Bug - AnandTech :: Your Source for Hardware Analysis and News</a></div>
</blockquote>
<p>la cosa assurda è che alla fine quel transistor incriminato non serve ad un cavolo <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/muro.gif.6709e291b079e93924b744bfde44f3a4.gif" alt=":muro:" /></p>
<p>giusto per risparmiare qualche mW quando non si usano quelle porte... bah...</p>
<p>cmq sono propenso a supporre che tenendo il chipset sotto ln2 il transistor incriminato possa durare piu' a lungo :sparatagrossa:</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262874</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262874</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Le085]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:24:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:13:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Pazzesco, ancora non è entrato nel clou delle vendite e già dei bug asd</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262873</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262873</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Voiager]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:13:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:10:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/4143/the-source-of-intels-cougar-point-sata-bug">The Source of Intel's Cougar Point SATA Bug - AnandTech :: Your Source for Hardware Analysis and News</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262872</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262872</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gianni1879]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:10:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:44:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>lowenz ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Penso che siano mesi/anni-macchina, quindi se uno ha un server aziendale acceso 24 ore al giorno dove gira un server SQL o simili lo vede dopo qualche settimana <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" />
<p><strong>In Intel l'hanno riprodotto dopo 2 giorni di stress test, da quello che ho capito</strong>.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>2 giorni ? :AAAAH: E come li stressava ? :cheazz:</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262871</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262871</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[swattolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:44:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:22:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>gianni1879 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>beh cmq il difetto si presenta dopo anni o mesi, per cui già quando ve ne accorgete avreste cambiato pc due volte <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" />
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Penso che siano mesi/anni-macchina, quindi se uno ha un server aziendale acceso 24 ore al giorno dove gira un server SQL o simili lo vede dopo qualche settimana <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" /></p>
<p>In Intel l'hanno riprodotto dopo 2 giorni di stress test, da quello che ho capito.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262870</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262870</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lowenz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:22:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:21:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>principe andry ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Quindi per chi ha una scheda madre di questo tipo e che non deve collegare più HD, non è un fattore molto limitante...<p>Certo se uno compra un prodotto lo vuole funzionante e perfetto al 100% (visto che non parliamo di spiccioli)</p>
<p>ciao</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>E' proprio questo il punto!!!</p>
<p>Le case produttrici di mobo in accordo con Intel, visti tutti i soldi che si beccano dovrebbereo richiamare tutte le schede vendute fino ad oggi e sostituirle!!</p>
<p>Anzi dovrebbero prima inviare il prodotto in sostituzione e poi richiamare il prodotto attuale!!!!</p>
<p>Beh ma qui siamo nel mondo reale!! Quasi dimenticavo che è sempre il consumatore che ne fa le spese!!! <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/muro.gif.6709e291b079e93924b744bfde44f3a4.gif" alt=":muro:" /> :muro: <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/muro.gif.6709e291b079e93924b744bfde44f3a4.gif" alt=":muro:" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262869</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262869</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kratos1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:21:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:18:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>lowenz ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Col controller diverso sicuro che vadano!</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Quindi per chi ha una scheda madre di questo tipo e che non deve collegare più HD, non è un fattore molto limitante...</p>
<p>Certo se uno compra un prodotto lo vuole funzionante e perfetto al 100% (visto che non parliamo di spiccioli)</p>
<p>ciao</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262868</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262868</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[principe andry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:18:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:41:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>beh cmq il difetto si presenta dopo anni o mesi, per cui già quando ve ne accorgete avreste cambiato pc due volte <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262867</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262867</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gianni1879]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:41:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Bug nei chipset per Sandy Bridge on Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:34:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>principe andry ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Quindi basterebbe affidarsi alle porte gestite da un controller differente (Marvell) o sulle sata3 gestite da Intel sia per HD che lettori ottici.<p>Dico bene o dico giusto? <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
<p>ciao</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Col controller diverso sicuro che vadano!</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262866</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/262866</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lowenz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:34:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>