<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>About one and a half years ago, Intel released LGA 1156, and plus three chipset P55/H55/H57. </p>
<p>As to CPU, main products are Core i3/i5/i7, and their obvious features are:</p>
<p>dual-core with built-in GPU, quad-core with built-in HT, and quad-core without built-in HT respectively. </p>
<p>As mentioned before, the primary goal of LGA 1156 platform is to replace Intel high-intermediate-level products; </p>
<p>besides, LGA 1366 is still the predominant platform for the high-level ones. </p>
<p>The product positioning of the new LGA 1155 is similar to that of LGA 1156.</p>
<p>To most users, they probably feel that the replacing is too fast. When facing three kinds of LGA platform, they even feel perplexed. </p>
<p>If future price of LGA 1156 can be lowered appropriately, </p>
<p>it is also a good trend that the platform becomes the mainstream for low-intermediate-level products.</p>
<p><img src="http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/6413/bp6701.jpg" alt="bp6701.jpg" /></p>
<p>At the beginning of 2010, Intel introduced 32nm CPU, and the related products are: </p>
<p>dual-core—LGA 1156 i3 and i5; six-core—LGA 1366 i7 980X Extreme, representing low and high-level CPU respectively. </p>
<p>As for 32nm quad-core processor, Sandy Bridge LGA 1155 will be released in 2011.</p>
<p>This article will introduce the latest LGA 1155 platform, and analyse important features about 32nm Sandy Bridge CPU. </p>
<p>As for the CPU, it is Intel Core i7-2600K, and “K” means that CPU multiplier can be unlocked. </p>
<p>The clock is 3.4GHz (maximum: 3.80GHz), and Turbo Boost 2.0 technology is supported. </p>
<p>There are 4 Cores and Hyper-Threading technology, so 8 Threading is supported, also abbreviated as 4C/8T. </p>
<p>And, the CPU uses 32 nm manufacturing process, with 95W and 8MB L3 Cache, is the highest-level specification amongst current LGA 1155.</p>
<p><img src="http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/6247/bp6702.jpg" alt="bp6702.jpg" /></p>
<p>Back side of 2600K D1 and 2400 D2:</p>
<p><img src="http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/4448/bp6703.jpg" alt="bp6703.jpg" /></p>
<p>The motherboard is BIOSTAR TSERIES TP67XE, and this brand’s products are famous for parity and overclocking. </p>
<p>The colour of the package is different; this time red makes the looking of the motherboard more distinguishing feature.</p>
<p><img src="http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/9978/bp6704.jpg" alt="bp6704.jpg" /></p>
<p>Accessories:</p>
<p>User’s Manual, Rear I/O Panel for ATX Case, Serial ATA Cable, CorssFire/SLI Bridge, Fully Setup Driver CD.</p>
<p><img src="http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/3475/bp6705.jpg" alt="bp6705.jpg" /></p>
<p>As for colour matching, PCB is black, and PCI-E or DIMM are matched red or white; the whole appearance looks not bad.</p>
<p><img src="http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/1374/bp6706.jpg" alt="bp6706.jpg" /></p>
<p>Red matching is an eye-catching design. </p>
<p>More and more electronic products are matched red and black, </p>
<p>the colour combination (similar to the colour used in automobile racing) that stresses speed or high performance.</p>
<p><img src="http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/4169/bp6707.jpg" alt="bp6707.jpg" /></p>
<p>Lower-left of the motherboard:</p>
<p>2 X PCI-E 2.0 X16: support 2Way CrossFireX and SLI technology, with bandwidth X8+X8</p>
<p>2 X PCI-E X1</p>
<p>2 X PCI</p>
<p>LAN chipset: Realtek RTL8111DL</p>
<p>Codec: Realtek ALC892, with 8+2 channels and supporting Blu-ray Codec technology</p>
<p><img src="http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/8851/bp6708.jpg" alt="bp6708.jpg" /></p>
<p>Lower-right of the motherboard:</p>
<p>3 X red SATAII: provided by P67 chipset, support RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, and RAID 10</p>
<p>2 X white SATAIII: provided by P67 chipset, support RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, and RAID 10</p>
<p>Power button, reset button, and debug indicators</p>
<p><img src="http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/3046/bp6709.jpg" alt="bp6709.jpg" /></p>
<p>Upper-right of the motherboard:</p>
<p>4 X DIMM DDR3, supporting 1066/1333/1600/1866/2133, maximum capacity of DDR3 is 16GB. Only by overclocking can DDR3 2133 above be achieved.</p>
<p>1 X IDE, 24-pin power connector</p>
<p><img src="http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/3572/bp6710.jpg" alt="bp6710.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/17982/intel-new-generation-performance-i7-2600k-with-biostar-tp67xe-5-1ghz-test</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:11:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/17982.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:30:21 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:25:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>5.4Ghz run the Superpi !!! <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /> <img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--smile" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":D" alt="😄" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256652</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256652</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[swattolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:25:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:19:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>sono curioso di sapere quanti GFlops fa a 5,4GHz,</p>
<p>puoi fare un run di linX e postarlo?</p>
<p>Grazie,</p>
<p>Lorenzo</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256651</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256651</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lorenzoneri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:19:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:42:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>5404 MHz?!?! That's insane!!! <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/icon_pray.gif.2f3ae52d46a32736fd890e2ce0aba6cd.gif" alt=":ave:" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256650</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256650</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[One1ros]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 08:42:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:19:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Update</p>
<p>BIOSTAR TP67XE 1/3 BIOS - Internal PLL Voltage Override</p>
<p><img src="http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/167/bp67b08.jpg" alt="bp67b08.jpg" /></p>
<p>2500K D2 OC 5404MHz</p>
<p><img src="http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/728/bp672500k.png" alt="bp672500k.png" /></p>
<p>Thanks <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256649</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256649</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:19:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 19:35:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>windwithme good job</p>
<p>little question for u, do u see the official datasheet of SB 1155?</p>
<p>I saw that the new max VDimm specification of SB 1155 is 1.575v ! now do u know if old kits 1.65 are compatible at 100% ?</p>
<p>t.y. <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256648</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256648</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devil_Mcry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 19:35:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:05:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>nice stuff dude <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256647</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256647</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[KURTZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:05:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 18:20:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>2600k.....good work..</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256646</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256646</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[keroro.90]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 18:20:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:35:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>This cpu, 2600k, is fantastic !!! <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /> <img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--smile" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":D" alt="😄" /></p>
<p>What do you think about Gigabyte UD3, UD5 for this cpu ?</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256645</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256645</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[swattolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:35:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:29:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Amazinggg</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256644</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256644</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:29:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:27:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Power consumption test:</p>
<p>System standby: 139W</p>
<p><img src="http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/5696/bp675gwidle.jpg" alt="bp675gwidle.jpg" /></p>
<p>CPU in full usage: 257W</p>
<p><img src="http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/4452/bp675gwfull.jpg" alt="bp675gwfull.jpg" /></p>
<p>Compared with power consumption of default clock rate:</p>
<p>Power consumption of system standby: 65% higher</p>
<p>Power consumption of CPU in full usage: 105% higher</p>
<p>It seems that the consumption increase so much, but as far as 5GHz high clock rate and high performance platform is concerned, 257W can be acceptable.</p>
<p>By the way, is 5GHz the maximum for 2600K under air-cooling? If fortunately, 5.1GHz can be achieved steadily.</p>
<p>CPU 100 X 51 =&gt; 5100.4MHz(Turbo Boost disabled; C1E disabled)</p>
<p>DDR3 2133.6 CL7 10-7-27 1T 1.650V</p>
<p>Hyper PI 32M X8=&gt; 11m 48.382s</p>
<p>Fritz Chess Benchmark =&gt; 40.11/19251</p>
<p><img src="http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/7005/bp6751gpi.png" alt="bp6751gpi.png" /></p>
<p>As to the latest Sandy Bridge LGA 1155 CPU in 2011, 2300~2500K all use L3 Cache 6MB, and only 2600/2600K is equipped with 8MB. </p>
<p>K series are 2500K and 2600K, but other Sandy Bridge CPU, with limited scope of bus speed, may only have 5~8% overclocking scope. </p>
<p>Therefore, LGA 1155 is categorised definitely. </p>
<p>To the consumers who want to overclock, choosing K series is suggested, but with higher prices. </p>
<p>And most of the other Sandy Bridge CPUs may be suitable to the consumers who don’t overclock. </p>
<p>About the consideration above, I’m not sure that Intel is overconfident with Sandy Bridge performance, or that Intel wants to let LGA 1156 survive.</p>
<p>Originally, I thought that the reason why clock rate and power consumption of LGA 1155 platform made great progress was that 45nm manufacturing process became 32nm. </p>
<p>However, afterwards I find that all Sandy Bridge CPUs are built in GPU, </p>
<p>so it will be more convenient for users in future to use the chipset with display output function, such as H67. </p>
<p>Moreover, another advantage of this new platform is that it has higher performance of DDR3 and Turbo Boost 2.0 technology.</p>
<p><img src="http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/2307/bp6719.jpg" alt="bp6719.jpg" /></p>
<p>I use new generation P67 chipset in the test. </p>
<p>When manufacturers release P67 motherboards in the market, their prices, I estimate, will be a bit expensive than the prices of P55 motherboards.</p>
<p>BIOSTAR TP67XE is still featured parity, and the price is about US$160. </p>
<p>The motherboard supports the latest USB 3.0 and SATA3; unique BIO-Remote2 multimedia software; and THX TrueStudioPRO sound effects technology.</p>
<p>Furthermore, TP67XE also shows great performance of overclocking, so it can be a high C/P P67 product. </p>
<p>BIOSTAR now also aims for supporting multimedia software and hardware technology, making its products more competitive in the market.</p>
<p>I shared much overclocking experience about X58 and P55 before, </p>
<p>and I shall continue overclocking and analysing P67 motherboards from various brands in future. </p>
<p>If there is something this article doesn’t mention, I shall renew related information in the future reports.</p>
<p> Finally, I hope with the release of new generation products, the prices of previous generation platforms can be lowered faster. </p>
<p>So, consumers can choose more platforms with good quality at bargain prices.</p>
<p>This article is also in my blog <a href="http://www.wretch.cc/blog/windwithme">WIND 3C</a>. Any comments are always welcome <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256643</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256643</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:27:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:12:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>CPU 5020.4MHz DDR3 2142 CL7 10-7-27 1T 1.650V</p>
<p>ADIA64 Memory Read: 25582 MB/s</p>
<p>Sandra Memory Bandwidth: 28475 MB/s</p>
<p>MaXXMEM Memory-Copy: 28139 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3583/bp675gmem.png" alt="bp675gmem.png" /></p>
<p>After CPU clock rises, the test figures of memory bandwidth in ADIA64 and MaXXMEM also rise obviously, </p>
<p>but not in Sandra Memory Bandwidth; this is the main difference amongst the three software. </p>
<p>And about the test figure of bandwidth, even if LGA 1155 and LGA 1156 are both dual-channel design, </p>
<p>the former shows about 20% greater performance than the latter does. </p>
<p>Although Sandy Bridge CPU only uses dual-channel design, its memory bandwidth can compete with that of LGA 1366.</p>
<p>ADIA64 Memory Read: 26605 MB/s</p>
<p>Sandra Memory Bandwidth: 29903 MB/s</p>
<p>MaXXMEM Memory-Copy: 29007 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/7222/bp675g2251mem.png" alt="bp675g2251mem.png" /></p>
<p>Due to the limited scope of bus speed of Sandy Bridge architecture, about only 104~108MHz can be adjusted (depending upon each CPU). </p>
<p>The default CPU bus speed can contribute to achieve DDR3 2133 clock rate, so overclocking would not be a big problem. </p>
<p>If DRAM quality is good enough, performance over DDR3 2200 is not a difficult challenge.</p>
<p>Overclocking performance:</p>
<p>CPU 100.4 X 50 =&gt; 5020.2MHz(Turbo Boost disabled; C1E disabled)</p>
<p>DDR3 2142 CL7 10-7-27 1T 1.650V</p>
<p>Hyper PI 32M X8=&gt; 12m 06.384s</p>
<p>CPUMARK 99=&gt; 774</p>
<p><img src="http://img602.imageshack.us/img602/7384/bp675gpi.png" alt="bp675gpi.png" /></p>
<p>Nuclearus Multi Core =&gt; 32585</p>
<p>Fritz Chess Benchmark =&gt; 39.29/18859</p>
<p><img src="http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/8936/bp675gnm.png" alt="bp675gnm.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalMark 2004R3 =&gt; 427585</p>
<p><img src="http://img814.imageshack.us/img814/1716/bp675gcm.png" alt="bp675gcm.png" /></p>
<p>CINEBENCH R11.5</p>
<p>CPU =&gt; 9.82 pts</p>
<p>CPU(Single Core) =&gt; 2.05 pts</p>
<p><img src="http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/558/bp675gcb.png" alt="bp675gcb.png" /></p>
<p>PCMark Vantage =&gt; 25062</p>
<p><img src="http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/5013/bp675gpcvan.png" alt="bp675gpcvan.png" /></p>
<p>3DMark Vantage </p>
<p>CPU SCORE =&gt; 65044</p>
<p><img src="http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/5289/bp675g3dvan.png" alt="bp675g3dvan.png" /></p>
<p>After 2600K is overclocked from 3.5 GHz to 5GHz, performance increases 20~30% in most software mentioned above. </p>
<p>When CPU is in full usage, voltage only needs 1.392V; hence, 32nm manufacturing process makes overclocking ability much better. </p>
<p>According to the related information I acquired on the Internet, 2600K over 5GHz is not commonly seen; </p>
<p>generally, the scope 2600K D1 is about 4.7~4.9GHz under air-cooling system.</p>
<p>The performance of Sandy Bridge is still better than 45nm 4C8T CPU (overclocking scope is 4.1~4.3GHz).</p>
<p>Temperature:</p>
<p>System standby: 43?~46?</p>
<p><img src="http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/6350/bp675gt1.png" alt="bp675gt1.png" /></p>
<p>CPU in full usage: 74?~83?</p>
<p>Intel Burn Test v2.4?Stress Level Maximum</p>
<p><img src="http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/4287/bp675gt2.png" alt="bp675gt2.png" /></p>
<p>If you want to overclock over 5GHz, you have to increase voltage, and note that temperature also rises much. </p>
<p>If you prefer low voltage and temperature for long-time using, 4.5GHz can be steady under 1.272V only. </p>
<p>Users can set personal setting by their preference.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256642</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256642</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:12:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:03:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Please refer to my BIOS setting:</p>
<p>Boot logo:</p>
<p><img src="http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/5199/bp67b01.jpg" alt="bp67b01.jpg" /></p>
<p>Main page:</p>
<p>Compliency is AMI UEFI X64 2.0</p>
<p><img src="http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/962/bp67b02.jpg" alt="bp67b02.jpg" /></p>
<p>O.N.E page:</p>
<p>The default setting of Turbo Mode is 38, 37, 36, and 35, with better CPU speeding up mode in version 2.0. </p>
<p>As to DRAM frequency, 1066~2133 modes are supported, so users can enjoy better DDR3 performance. </p>
<p>CPU Base Clock shows 10000, which means current bus speed is 100.00MHz; if it shows 10560, which means 105.60MHz. </p>
<p>Therefore, the item may not show an integer, such as 133, 166, 200MHz.</p>
<p><img src="http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/1619/bp67b03.jpg" alt="bp67b03.jpg" /></p>
<p>The setting above is DDR3 arguments, providing users to choose faster arguments; of course, making the system steady is also important.</p>
<p>There are 4 modes for CPU VCore Mode: SPEC Volgate/Auto/Offset Mode/Fixed Mode</p>
<p>CPU VCore Offset +0.010~+0.520V</p>
<p>CPU VCore Fixed 1.000~1.790V</p>
<p><img src="http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/4076/bp67b04.jpg" alt="bp67b04.jpg" /></p>
<p>DRAM Voltage 1.300~2.200V</p>
<p><img src="http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/9431/bp67b05.jpg" alt="bp67b05.jpg" /></p>
<p>CPU Configuration:</p>
<p>Some functions about CPU, such as common HT technology; you also can choose how many cores you want to activate.</p>
<p><img src="http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/6886/bp67b06.jpg" alt="bp67b06.jpg" /></p>
<p>PC Health Status:</p>
<p>With built-in monitor chipset, you can know main voltage or temperature information.</p>
<p><img src="http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/2176/bp67b07.jpg" alt="bp67b07.jpg" /></p>
<p>As to overclocking, this time it is not necessary for LGA 1155 to adjust too many items. </p>
<p>So just focus on CPU voltage, clock multiplier; and DRAM clock, arguments, voltage. </p>
<p>Due to the limited scope of bus speed (about 5~7%), using K series CPU would be a better choice to overclock substantially.</p>
<p>As to DDR3, I use US brand CORSAIR high-level DOMINATOR-GT series—the latest CMT4GX3M2B2133C9. </p>
<p>GT series use red and black as colour matching; in recent year, more and more motherboard and DRAM also use the two colours. </p>
<p><img src="http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/908/bp6717.jpg" alt="bp6717.jpg" /></p>
<p>The argument specification is CL9 10-9-27 1.50V. </p>
<p>Compared with DDR3 voltage specification (1.650V) recommended by Intel, 1.50V only of GT 2133 can make the system steady. </p>
<p>AIRFLOW of Red-black version with DOMINATOR-GT makes the appearance quality nicer.</p>
<p><img src="http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3737/bp6718.jpg" alt="bp6718.jpg" /></p>
<p>CPU 3502.8MHz DDR3 2135.2 CL7 10-7-27 1T 1.650V</p>
<p>ADIA64 Memory Read: 22132 MB/s</p>
<p>Sandra Memory Bandwidth: 28132 MB/s</p>
<p>MaXXMEM Memory-Copy: 21755 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/4246/bp67dmem.png" alt="bp67dmem.png" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256641</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256641</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:03:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:53:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Default performance:</p>
<p>CPU 100.1 X 35 =&gt; 3502.7MHz (Turbo Boost enabled, C1E disabled)</p>
<p>DDR3 2135.2 CL7 10-7-27 1T 1.650V</p>
<p>The architecture of Sandy Bridge CPU is different from that of previous Core i7. The bus speed is changed to 100MHz. </p>
<p>And about other frequency information, the highest ratio of 1366 CPU is 133/1866, 1156 CPU is 133/1600. </p>
<p>Now the default frequency of 1155 CPU can achieve 100/2133, making DDR3 clock show better performance.</p>
<p>Hyper PI 32M X8=&gt; 14m 57.750s</p>
<p>CPUMARK 99=&gt; 540</p>
<p><img src="http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/4482/bp67dpi.png" alt="bp67dpi.png" /></p>
<p>Nuclearus Multi Core =&gt; 22513</p>
<p>Fritz Chess Benchmark =&gt; 27.58/13236</p>
<p><img src="http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/7479/bp67dnm.png" alt="bp67dnm.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalMark 2004R3 =&gt; 332817</p>
<p><img src="http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/5629/bp67dcm.png" alt="bp67dcm.png" /></p>
<p>CINEBENCH R11.5</p>
<p>CPU =&gt; 6.83 pts</p>
<p>CPU(Single Core) =&gt; 1.43 pts</p>
<p><img src="http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/666/bp67dcb.png" alt="bp67dcb.png" /></p>
<p>PCMark Vantage =&gt; 19941</p>
<p><img src="http://img808.imageshack.us/img808/9279/bp67dpcvan.png" alt="bp67dpcvan.png" /></p>
<p>3DMark Vantage </p>
<p>CPU SCORE =&gt; 53268</p>
<p><img src="http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/7310/bp67d3dvan.png" alt="bp67d3dvan.png" /></p>
<p>The default clock of 2006K is 3.4GHz. After Turbo Boost 2.0 is enabled, the clock can achieve 3.5~3.8GHz by CPU usage. </p>
<p>Hence, the test figures above are great, so the result means CPU can easily deal with many tasks under any circumstances. </p>
<p>And as to CPU performance under the same clock, I find that LGA 1155 is about 10% higher than LGA 1156. </p>
<p>As to DDR3 bandwidth, probably with more advanced Memory Controller technology, I find there is 20~30% performance improvement in much software. </p>
<p>Therefore, about basic performance and DDR3 bandwidth, Intel Sandy Bridge CPU with latest architecture has made great progress.</p>
<p>Temperature:</p>
<p>System standby: 33?~37?</p>
<p><img src="http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/6573/bp67dt1.pngCPU%20in%20full%20usage:%2044%E2%84%83~47%E2%84%83%3C/p%3E%3Cp%3EIntel%20Burn%20Test%20v2.4%EF%BC%8CStress%20Level%20Maximum%3C/p%3E%3Cp%3E%5Bimg%5Dhttp://img227.imageshack.us/img227/9463/bp67dt2.png" alt="bp67dt2.png" /></p>
<p>Hence about the temperature of 2600K:</p>
<p>Standby: about 3?~5?lower than the temperature of 1156 45nm CPU.</p>
<p>Full usage: about 10?lower than the temperature of 1156 45nm CPU.</p>
<p>It goes without saying that as to testing temperature, different motherboards display divergent results. </p>
<p>But through the comparing, we can observe the temperature difference between 32nm and 45nm of 4C8T.</p>
<p>Power consumption:</p>
<p>Standby: 84W</p>
<p><img src="http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/8071/bp67dwidle.jpg" alt="bp67dwidle.jpg" /></p>
<p>CPU full speed: 125W</p>
<p><img src="http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/2048/bp67dwfull.jpg" alt="bp67dwfull.jpg" /></p>
<p>As to power consumption, with 32nm manufacturing process technology, the power saving of this CPU is 30~50W more than that of 45nm Core i7. </p>
<p>So obviously Sandy Bridge CPU can save more energy, and this is also one of the reasons why consumers may prefer quad-core platform.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256640</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256640</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:53:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:43:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Upper-left of the motherboard:</p>
<p>TP67XE adopts 10-phase power supply, the design that is enough for 32nm CPU. There are two 8-Pin power connectors, </p>
<p>which are usually seen only on high-level motherboard (such as for server). </p>
<p>The existence of dual 8-Pin is not aimed at high power consumption of P67, </p>
<p>but at LN2 users who have to consume more 12V under high clock (such as overclocking).</p>
<p><img src="http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/73/bp6711.jpg" alt="bp6711.jpg" /></p>
<p>IO:</p>
<p>6 X USB 2.0 (Red/Black)</p>
<p>2 X USB 3.0 (Blue)</p>
<p>1 X eSATA/USB 2.0 (both Red)</p>
<p>1 X 1394</p>
<p>1 X RJ-45 </p>
<p>1 X S/PDIF</p>
<p><img src="http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/7200/bp6712.jpg" alt="bp6712.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/2572/bp6713.jpg" alt="bp6713.jpg" /></p>
<p>In the past, I preferred not using a computer case when testing hardware.</p>
<p>But this time many net pals hope me to use a case so that the test result,</p>
<p>such as overclocking ability and temperature, will be more similar to most consumers’ condition. </p>
<p>The case is high-intermediate-level product</p>
<p>Antec DF-35, with 1 x top 140mm fan, 1 x rear white 120mm fan, and 2 x front variable-speed 120mm fans with white LED. </p>
<p>DF-35 has such advanced cooling system that it is helpful to keep the system steady after the computer is overclocked.</p>
<p><img src="http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/4664/bp6714.jpg" alt="bp6714.jpg" /></p>
<p>Test platform:</p>
<p>CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K</p>
<p>MB: BIOSTAR TSERIES TP67XE</p>
<p>DRAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GT CMT4GX3M2B2133C9</p>
<p>VGA: GIGABYTE GTX460 OC </p>
<p>HD: Intel X25-V 40GB RAID 0</p>
<p>POWER: Antec High Current Gamer 620W</p>
<p>Cooler: Mega Shadow Deluxe Edition</p>
<p>Case: Antec DF-35</p>
<p>OS: Windows7 Ultimate 64bit</p>
<p><img src="http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/8526/bp6715.jpg" alt="bp6715.jpg" /></p>
<p>Whole LGA 1155 system in Antec DF-35:</p>
<p><img src="http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/3969/bp6716.jpg" alt="bp6716.jpg" /></p>
<p>BIOSTAR provides much software:</p>
<p><img src="http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/3743/bp67os1.png" alt="bp67os1.png" /></p>
<p>Energy-saving software has been very popular in recent years. </p>
<p>CPU can effectively lower power consumption according to user’s setting.</p>
<p><img src="http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/3407/bp67os2.png" alt="bp67os2.png" /></p>
<p>TOVERCLOCKER is BIOSTAR’s unique software</p>
<p>The software provides CPU, Memory information, and also shows H/W Monitor.</p>
<p><img src="http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/662/bp67os3.png" alt="bp67os3.png" /></p>
<p>In TOVERCLOCKER, OC TWEAKER, which can adjust many clocks, is a useful tool to overclock.</p>
<p><img src="http://img573.imageshack.us/img573/3985/bp67os4.png" alt="bp67os4.png" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256639</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256639</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:43:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel New Generation Performance-i7 2600K with BIOSTAR TP67XE (5.1GHz) Test on Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:30:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>About one and a half years ago, Intel released LGA 1156, and plus three chipset P55/H55/H57. </p>
<p>As to CPU, main products are Core i3/i5/i7, and their obvious features are:</p>
<p>dual-core with built-in GPU, quad-core with built-in HT, and quad-core without built-in HT respectively. </p>
<p>As mentioned before, the primary goal of LGA 1156 platform is to replace Intel high-intermediate-level products; </p>
<p>besides, LGA 1366 is still the predominant platform for the high-level ones. </p>
<p>The product positioning of the new LGA 1155 is similar to that of LGA 1156.</p>
<p>To most users, they probably feel that the replacing is too fast. When facing three kinds of LGA platform, they even feel perplexed. </p>
<p>If future price of LGA 1156 can be lowered appropriately, </p>
<p>it is also a good trend that the platform becomes the mainstream for low-intermediate-level products.</p>
<p><img src="http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/6413/bp6701.jpg" alt="bp6701.jpg" /></p>
<p>At the beginning of 2010, Intel introduced 32nm CPU, and the related products are: </p>
<p>dual-core—LGA 1156 i3 and i5; six-core—LGA 1366 i7 980X Extreme, representing low and high-level CPU respectively. </p>
<p>As for 32nm quad-core processor, Sandy Bridge LGA 1155 will be released in 2011.</p>
<p>This article will introduce the latest LGA 1155 platform, and analyse important features about 32nm Sandy Bridge CPU. </p>
<p>As for the CPU, it is Intel Core i7-2600K, and “K” means that CPU multiplier can be unlocked. </p>
<p>The clock is 3.4GHz (maximum: 3.80GHz), and Turbo Boost 2.0 technology is supported. </p>
<p>There are 4 Cores and Hyper-Threading technology, so 8 Threading is supported, also abbreviated as 4C/8T. </p>
<p>And, the CPU uses 32 nm manufacturing process, with 95W and 8MB L3 Cache, is the highest-level specification amongst current LGA 1155.</p>
<p><img src="http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/6247/bp6702.jpg" alt="bp6702.jpg" /></p>
<p>Back side of 2600K D1 and 2400 D2:</p>
<p><img src="http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/4448/bp6703.jpg" alt="bp6703.jpg" /></p>
<p>The motherboard is BIOSTAR TSERIES TP67XE, and this brand’s products are famous for parity and overclocking. </p>
<p>The colour of the package is different; this time red makes the looking of the motherboard more distinguishing feature.</p>
<p><img src="http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/9978/bp6704.jpg" alt="bp6704.jpg" /></p>
<p>Accessories:</p>
<p>User’s Manual, Rear I/O Panel for ATX Case, Serial ATA Cable, CorssFire/SLI Bridge, Fully Setup Driver CD.</p>
<p><img src="http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/3475/bp6705.jpg" alt="bp6705.jpg" /></p>
<p>As for colour matching, PCB is black, and PCI-E or DIMM are matched red or white; the whole appearance looks not bad.</p>
<p><img src="http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/1374/bp6706.jpg" alt="bp6706.jpg" /></p>
<p>Red matching is an eye-catching design. </p>
<p>More and more electronic products are matched red and black, </p>
<p>the colour combination (similar to the colour used in automobile racing) that stresses speed or high performance.</p>
<p><img src="http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/4169/bp6707.jpg" alt="bp6707.jpg" /></p>
<p>Lower-left of the motherboard:</p>
<p>2 X PCI-E 2.0 X16: support 2Way CrossFireX and SLI technology, with bandwidth X8+X8</p>
<p>2 X PCI-E X1</p>
<p>2 X PCI</p>
<p>LAN chipset: Realtek RTL8111DL</p>
<p>Codec: Realtek ALC892, with 8+2 channels and supporting Blu-ray Codec technology</p>
<p><img src="http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/8851/bp6708.jpg" alt="bp6708.jpg" /></p>
<p>Lower-right of the motherboard:</p>
<p>3 X red SATAII: provided by P67 chipset, support RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, and RAID 10</p>
<p>2 X white SATAIII: provided by P67 chipset, support RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, and RAID 10</p>
<p>Power button, reset button, and debug indicators</p>
<p><img src="http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/3046/bp6709.jpg" alt="bp6709.jpg" /></p>
<p>Upper-right of the motherboard:</p>
<p>4 X DIMM DDR3, supporting 1066/1333/1600/1866/2133, maximum capacity of DDR3 is 16GB. Only by overclocking can DDR3 2133 above be achieved.</p>
<p>1 X IDE, 24-pin power connector</p>
<p><img src="http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/3572/bp6710.jpg" alt="bp6710.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256638</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/256638</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 12:30:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>