<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[2010 Mainstream DIY PC Reference – Intel Platform OC Performance Guide]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It’s been years for users to select different components to make own DIY PC.</p>
<p>Advantage of DIY is freedom. </p>
<p>Comparing to brand PC, there is only one brand to provide after service.</p>
<p>The DIY PC can have the vendors or distributors warranty.</p>
<p>For this warranty, you have to go to different service center by different components. </p>
<p>However, you can choose your favorite brands and suitable products.</p>
<p>This is the main reason for DIY PC users are interested in computer technology or studying before buying.</p>
<p>Windwithme also mentioned in previous article that most DIY PC users are concerned about budget. </p>
<p>So they set the budget first and search for suitable products.</p>
<p>This review is introducing Intel platform with built-in GPU to make a good C/P PC.</p>
<p><img src="http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/1960/intel201001.jpg" alt="intel201001.jpg" /></p>
<p>Last review is AMD mainstream PC guide.</p>
<p>This time, I will use similar budget to compare the Intel platform.</p>
<p>My original idea was putting Intel and AMD PC in one article. </p>
<p>However, the content is too long, so I divided into 2 parts. </p>
<p>If you are interested, you can compare to these 2 guides. </p>
<p>I believe you can have more idea for current mainstream hardware performance and price. </p>
<p>Also, it can help you to make decision before buying.</p>
<p>CPU Part</p>
<p>I use Intel current hot sell model Core i3-540.</p>
<p>3.06GHz, 32nm manufacturing, 4MB L3 Cache, Revision K0.</p>
<p>Physical 2 Cores with Hyper-Threading for 4 threading, called 2C/4T.</p>
<p>K0 version is adding ID(PCID) technology into processor.</p>
<p>Most users all hope new version can be better at OC.</p>
<p>The price is 3350NTD, around 112USD.</p>
<p><img src="http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/5245/intel201002.jpg" alt="intel201002.jpg" /></p>
<p>Inside Box</p>
<p>Product manual, original cooler, Intel Core i3-540</p>
<p><img src="http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/6497/intel201003.jpg" alt="intel201003.jpg" /></p>
<p>Upper-Right is cooler bottom. It’s 100% aluminum also with thermal pate in the bottom.</p>
<p>Lower-Left is Intel Core i3-540. LGA 1156 Socket. </p>
<p>It’s recommended for H55/H57 chipsets.</p>
<p>You also can use P55 chipset, but the GPU function will be disable.</p>
<p><img src="http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/4052/intel201004.jpg" alt="intel201004.jpg" /></p>
<p>DRAM Part</p>
<p>Recently, the DDR3 4GB price is very cheap. You can choose 2GBX2 or 4GBX2.</p>
<p>If you have more budget and plan to use 64Bit OS, 4GBX2 is better pick.</p>
<p>I use CORSAIR DDR3 1600 4GBX2. 1600 version price is a little higher.</p>
<p>CORSAIR is internal well-known brand and famous in quality control. The price is acceptable.</p>
<p>The price is around 115USD.</p>
<p><img src="http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/898/intel201005.jpg" alt="intel201005.jpg" /></p>
<p>CORSAIR CMX8GX3M2A1600C9</p>
<p>Core i3 can support DDR3 1333 without OC.</p>
<p>For Intel platform, you just pull CPU clock, the DDR3 can reach 1600~1800.</p>
<p>If your budget is limited, you can use DDR3 1333 or 2GX2.</p>
<p><img src="http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/3566/intel201006.jpg" alt="intel201006.jpg" /></p>
<p>MB Part</p>
<p>H55 or H57 chipsets are first choice for Intel built-in GPU platform.</p>
<p>The main difference is H57 supporting Raid, but H55 price is lower. </p>
<p>You can find many models and spec in the market.</p>
<p>I choose mid-price GIGABYTE H55M-UD2H. it’s 3500NTD, around 117USD.</p>
<p>GIGABYTE GA-H55M-UD2H Look</p>
<p>Ultra Durable 3, 2oz copper PCB, 100% Japanese made capacitors</p>
<p>3x USB Power supports On/Off Charge which can charge iPhone, iPad and iPod touch easily.</p>
<p>USB 3x Power also provide more stable power to external USB devices.</p>
<p><img src="http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/828/intel201007.jpg" alt="intel201007.jpg" /></p>
<p>CPU PWM 4+2 phases</p>
<p>2 X PCI-E X16 supports ATI Hybrid CrossFireX technology. </p>
<p>The bandwidth is X16+X4.</p>
<p>Audio chip is Realtek ALC892. It supports 7.1 channel and Dolby Home Theater surrounding technology.</p>
<p>GIGABYTE also has another model, H55M-S2V, spec and components are lower. The price is 700NTD cheaper, around 24USD.</p>
<p><img src="http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/8477/intel201008.jpg" alt="intel201008.jpg" /></p>
<p>Power Supply Part</p>
<p>I pick Be Quiet! Straight Power Deluxe 400W which is E6 product line.</p>
<p>The price is 2400NTD, around 80USD.</p>
<p><img src="http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8333/intel201009.jpg" alt="intel201009.jpg" /></p>
<p>80Plus Copper Certificate, Active PFC design, 18dBA super silent 12cm fan, 5 years warranty.</p>
<p>If you only use PC for word processing and no more graphic card upgrade need, you can consider Be Quiet! L6 350W.</p>
<p><img src="http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/8611/intel201010.jpg" alt="intel201010.jpg" /></p>
<p>HDD still use WD 640AAKS. The cheap price is main advantage even the performance is not the best.</p>
<p>If you need more capacity, currently 1T~1.5T HDD price is only a little higher. You just need to study the HD performance more.</p>
<p>In Intel platform, CPU and MB price are few hundred NTD higher.</p>
<p>If including Case, DVD-ROM, the price is around 16260NTD, 524USD.</p>
<p>Many users trust in Intel brand or performance due to the Intel structure.</p>
<p>The configuration is not absolute. </p>
<p>If you don’t need such high performance, you can pick cheaper one.</p>
<p>However, if you need higher performance, you can buy the better spec one.</p>
<p>Per your need, budget and brand, you can make your own configuration to enjoy the DIY fun.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/17879/2010-mainstream-diy-pc-reference-intel-platform-oc-performance-guide</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:07:13 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/17879.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:34:26 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2010 Mainstream DIY PC Reference – Intel Platform OC Performance Guide on Fri, 31 Dec 2010 08:19:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Awesome work!</p>
<p>Simply outstanding <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/wink.png.981122a168c49b836247b5559b1cdcb0.png" alt=";)" /></p>
<p>(Ed è esattamente quello che ho fatto col mio i3-530 <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" />)</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254996</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254996</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lowenz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 08:19:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2010 Mainstream DIY PC Reference – Intel Platform OC Performance Guide on Fri, 31 Dec 2010 03:13:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>WindowsExperience Index - CPU 7.3</p>
<p><img src="http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/8122/intel2010owind7.png" alt="intel2010owind7.png" /></p>
<p>PCMark Vantage =&gt; 7701</p>
<p><img src="http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/6751/intel2010opcvan.png" alt="intel2010opcvan.png" /></p>
<p>After Core i3-540 OC to 4.14GHz, the performance increase 30% comparing to default 3.06GHz.</p>
<p>Also compare to previous AMD X4 640 CPU OC to 3.6GHz.</p>
<p>i3-540 reply on own higher performance and frequency, it only small behind most quad-core full load software.</p>
<p>In Nuclearus Multi and Core PCMark Vantage, Intel even leads.</p>
<p>Hyper PI 32M and CPUAMRK99 even have bigger gap due to Intel structure.</p>
<p>Temperature</p>
<p>System Idle - 34~36</p>
<p><img src="http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/9639/intel2010ot1.png" alt="intel2010ot1.png" /></p>
<p>CPUFull Speed - 77~79</p>
<p>Intel Burn Test v2.4?Stress Level Maximum</p>
<p><img src="http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/1912/intel2010ot2.png" alt="intel2010ot2.png" /></p>
<p>After OC, the idle temperature is similar to default.</p>
<p>Full Speed temperature rise about 20. The main reason is the original cooler too thin and CPU clock increase 1.1GHz after OC.</p>
<p>Due to 32nm manufacture, you just need to use better cooler, you can OC it to 4.4~4.6GHz without any issues.</p>
<p>Power Consumption</p>
<p>System Idle - 63W</p>
<p><img src="http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/1576/intel2010oidle.jpg" alt="intel2010oidle.jpg" /></p>
<p>CPU Full Speed - 110W</p>
<p><img src="http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/9150/intel2010ofull.jpg" alt="intel2010ofull.jpg" /></p>
<p>After OC, the idle power consumption increase 11W and Full Speed increase 27W.</p>
<p>The range is very small, but the CPU performance enhance obviously.</p>
<p>The power consumption of dual core plus 32nm is very impressive.</p>
<p>This Intel mainstream DIY PC guide is i3-540 and H55.</p>
<p>The previous AMD mainstream DIY PC guide is X4 640 and 880G.</p>
<p>Let’s review the main performance difference in 2 platforms again.</p>
<p>3D part, in non-OC condition, they are very similar, but Intel built-in GPU has better OC ability.</p>
<p>After OC GPU, its 3D performance is better than AMD 880G. The most inconvenient thing is after OC CPU/DRAM, the GPU OC capability will be lower.</p>
<p>880G doesn’t have this issue. So both platforms have different advantages.</p>
<p>CPU performance, Intel leads in single core and AMD leads in multi-core full speed mode.</p>
<p>The main reason is that Core i3 simulate HT at dual core mode.</p>
<p>But rely on 32nm manufacture and good OC capability, i3-540 after OC single core performance lead X4 640 a lot. </p>
<p>Even for multi-tasking, i3-540 also leads X4 640 in some applications.</p>
<p><img src="http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/9799/intel201012.jpg" alt="intel201012.jpg" /></p>
<p>These 2 platforms are similar price and level. It does take time to research before starting.</p>
<p>Includes Case, DVD-ROM to build a PC around 16500NTD and consider quality and performance, I use more high end configuration.</p>
<p>If you have limited budget, you can use cheaper H55, DDR3 2GX2 and 350W PSU.</p>
<p>The PC price will drop to 12500NTD, around 429USD. You can have a most entry Intel PC.</p>
<p>It takes weeks to finish these two 2010 DIY PC guide.</p>
<p>Windwithme will make 2011 guide with LGA 1155 platform.</p>
<p>Thanks for all readers and friends support in 2010. Hope next year the PC movement can be faster, and price can be lower. </p>
<p>Let’s look forward the new platform few months later.  <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
<p>This year, I only share two DC reviews. It’s too busy for me to share more DSLR. Hopefully, next year I can improve this.</p>
<p><img src="http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/2834/intel201013.jpg" alt="intel201013.jpg" /></p>
<p>This article is also in my blog <a href="http://www.wretch.cc/blog/windwithme">WIND 3C</a>. Any comments are always welcome.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254995</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254995</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 03:13:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2010 Mainstream DIY PC Reference – Intel Platform OC Performance Guide on Fri, 31 Dec 2010 03:05:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>DDR3 Parameters Setup Page</p>
<p>If your system is unstable after OC, you can fine tune non-Auto items.</p>
<p>For example, you can change to 2T or rise the CL to enhance the stability.</p>
<p><img src="http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/309/intel2010b04.jpg" alt="intel2010b04.jpg" /></p>
<p>Voltage Page</p>
<p>Pull high CPU clock, you needs to add CPU Vcore. Pull high DDR3 clock or better latency, you need to add DRAM Voltage.</p>
<p>If you pull high both CPU and DDR3 clock, ex. 200/1600 or 180/1800, you need to adjust QPI/Vtt Voltage.</p>
<p>In general condition, I recommend DRAM Voltage 1.660V and QPI/Vtt Voltage should below 1.250V.</p>
<p><img src="http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/2760/intel2010b05.jpg" alt="intel2010b05.jpg" /></p>
<p>PC Health Status</p>
<p><img src="http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/7821/intel2010b06.jpg" alt="intel2010b06.jpg" /></p>
<p>Due to built-in GPU, i3-540 cannot run CPU/DRAM at 200/2000.</p>
<p>You only can set 200/1600 or 180/1800 (depends on quality) to achieve the best OC ratio.</p>
<p>If you want to reach 200/2000 as P55 in this All in one platform, you need to add an external graphic card.</p>
<p>DDR3 Bandwidth Comparison</p>
<p>DDR3 1333.4 CL6 6-6-18 1T 1.400V</p>
<p>ADIA64 Memory Read - 8855 MB/s</p>
<p>Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 10407 MB/s</p>
<p>MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 8116 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/2319/intel2010dmem.png" alt="intel2010dmem.png" /></p>
<p>DDR3 1800.2 CL9 9-9-24 2T 1.600V</p>
<p>ADIA64 Memory Read - 11181 MB/s</p>
<p>Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 13510 MB/s</p>
<p>MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 10778 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/6913/intel2010o1800mem.png" alt="intel2010o1800mem.png" /></p>
<p>DDR3 1600.2 CL7 8-7-21 1T 1.600V</p>
<p>ADIA64 Memory Read - 11902 MB/s</p>
<p>Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 14362 MB/s</p>
<p>MaXXMEM Memory-Copy - 11690 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/9677/intel2010o1600mem.png" alt="intel2010o1600mem.png" /></p>
<p>You can see Intel Clarkdale DDR3 performance is similar to AMD platform under non-OC condition.</p>
<p>But after OC, the DDR3 performance is far away ahead AMD.</p>
<p>Even though, comparing to Intel quad-core P55, X58 bandwidth is far behind. But i3-540 has quite good DDR3 performance.</p>
<p>Configuring with CORSAIR 4GBX2 1600, the official spec is CL9. It looks quite conservative.</p>
<p>No matter Intel or AMD platform, it can reach 1600 CL7 8-7-24 1T.</p>
<p>The bandwidth also increases a lot. In Intel platform, it can reach 1800 CL9 2T.</p>
<p>OC Performance Test</p>
<p>CPU 180MHz X 23 =&gt; 4140.5MHz</p>
<p>DDR3 1800 CL9 9-9-24 2T 1.600V</p>
<p>Hyper PI 32M X4 =&gt; 14m 49.202s</p>
<p>CPUMARK 99 =&gt; 644</p>
<p><img src="http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/3995/intel2010opi.png" alt="intel2010opi.png" /></p>
<p>Nuclearus Multi Core =&gt; 16189</p>
<p>Fritz Chess Benchmark =&gt; 15.63/7500</p>
<p><img src="http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/98/intel2010onm.png" alt="intel2010onm.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalMark 2004R3 =&gt; 173900</p>
<p><img src="http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/7430/intel2010ocm.png" alt="intel2010ocm.png" /></p>
<p>CINEBENCH R11.5</p>
<p>CPU =&gt; 3.46 pts</p>
<p>CPU(Single Core) =&gt; 1.39 pts</p>
<p><img src="http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/9976/intel2010ocb.png" alt="intel2010ocb.png" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254994</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254994</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 03:05:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2010 Mainstream DIY PC Reference – Intel Platform OC Performance Guide on Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:56:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>CPU Full Speed - 83W</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/3195/intel2010dfull.jpg" alt="intel2010dfull.jpg" /></p>
<p>System idle power consumption 52W is not too low. </p>
<p>However, the full speed is only 83W to bring out 32nm advantage.</p>
<p>If you enable C1E, it’s only 38W at idle status. I believe it’s very low consumption in PC.</p>
<p>3D Performance</p>
<p>Built-in GPU Intel Clarkdale 733MHz</p>
<p>3DMARK 2006 =&gt; 1752</p>
<p><img src="http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/7396/intel2010d3d06.png" alt="intel2010d3d06.png" /></p>
<p>3DMARK VANTAGE =&gt; P371</p>
<p>CPU SCORE =&gt; 8956</p>
<p>GPU SCORE =&gt; 281</p>
<p><img src="http://img813.imageshack.us/img813/589/intel2010d3dvan.png" alt="intel2010d3dvan.png" /></p>
<p>StreetFighter IV Benchmark</p>
<p>1024 X 768 =&gt; 20.62FPS</p>
<p><img src="http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/7607/intel2010dstf4.png" alt="intel2010dstf4.png" /></p>
<p>Intel Clarkdale OC to 1033MHz</p>
<p>3DMARK 2006 =&gt; 2223</p>
<p><img src="http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/5341/intel2010d3d06o.png" alt="intel2010d3d06o.png" /></p>
<p>3DMARK VANTAGE =&gt; P580</p>
<p>CPU SCORE =&gt; 8909</p>
<p>GPU SCORE =&gt; 442</p>
<p><img src="http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/2639/intel2010d3dvano.png" alt="intel2010d3dvano.png" /></p>
<p>StreetFighter IV Benchmark</p>
<p>1024 X 768 =&gt; 26.85FPS</p>
<p><img src="http://img560.imageshack.us/img560/1580/intel2010dstf4o.png" alt="intel2010dstf4o.png" /></p>
<p>After OC GPU, the 3DMARK 2006 increase 27% and 3DMARK VANTAGE increase 56%.</p>
<p>For the game StreetFighter IV Benchmark, it’s also 30% higher.</p>
<p>Even for most mid to high end GAME still cannot run smoothly, it’s still helpful for normal 3D GAME performance.</p>
<p>If you pull high CPU/DARM ratio, the GPU OC range will be lower.</p>
<p>Maybe it’s caused by Intel integrated GPU into CPU. If you OC the GPU, please watch out this issue.</p>
<p>BIOS OC Setup</p>
<p>Main BIOS Tuning Menu, called M.I.T.</p>
<p>I set CPU clock at 180MHz to match DDR3-1800 ratio.</p>
<p><img src="http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/4351/intel2010b01.jpg" alt="intel2010b01.jpg" /></p>
<p>CPU Related Items</p>
<p>C1E is power saving feature. When CPU utilization is low, CPU will lower the frequency automatically.</p>
<p><img src="http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/1497/intel2010b02.jpg" alt="intel2010b02.jpg" /></p>
<p>If your DRAM cannot reach 1800, you can change the ratio at System Memory Multiplier.</p>
<p><img src="http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/112/intel2010b03.jpg" alt="intel2010b03.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254993</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254993</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:56:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2010 Mainstream DIY PC Reference – Intel Platform OC Performance Guide on Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:47:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Test Configuration</p>
<p>CPU: Intel Core i3-540</p>
<p>MB: GIGABYTE GA-H55M-UD2H</p>
<p>DRAM: CORSAIR CMX8GX3M2A1600C9</p>
<p>VGA: Intel Clarkdale GPU</p>
<p>HD: WD 640AAKS 640GB 7200rpm</p>
<p>POWER: Be Quiet! Straight Power Deluxe 400W</p>
<p>Cooler: Intel original cooler</p>
<p><img src="http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/8016/intel201011.jpg" alt="intel201011.jpg" /></p>
<p>Default Performance (C1E Disable)</p>
<p>CPU 133.3MHz X 23 =&gt; 3067MHz</p>
<p>DDR3 1333.6 CL6 7-6-18 1T 1.400V</p>
<p>Hyper PI 32M X4 =&gt; 19m 20.549s</p>
<p>CPUMARK 99 =&gt; 478</p>
<p><img src="http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/6601/intel2010dpi.png" alt="intel2010dpi.png" /></p>
<p>Nuclearus Multi Core =&gt; 11961</p>
<p>Fritz Chess Benchmark =&gt; 11.65/5590</p>
<p><img src="http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/3117/intel2010dnm.png" alt="intel2010dnm.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalMark 2004R3 =&gt; 131958</p>
<p><img src="http://img709.imageshack.us/img709/8849/intel2010dcm.png" alt="intel2010dcm.png" /></p>
<p>CINEBENCH R11.5</p>
<p>CPU =&gt; 2.56 pts</p>
<p>CPU(Single Core) =&gt; 1.03 pts</p>
<p><img src="http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/9333/intel2010dcb.png" alt="intel2010dcb.png" /></p>
<p>Windows Experience Index - CPU 7.3</p>
<p><img src="http://img839.imageshack.us/img839/9379/intel2010dwind7.png" alt="intel2010dwind7.png" /></p>
<p>PCMark Vantage =&gt; 6333</p>
<p><img src="http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/5395/intel2010dpcvan.png" alt="intel2010dpcvan.png" /></p>
<p>Compare to previous AMD X4 640. I3-540 performance is lower about 10~25% in many multi-core benchmark.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Spuer PI, CPUMARK for single core performance, it’s higher around 18~20%.</p>
<p>Windows Experience Index 7.3 is same. PCMark Vantage, i3-540 is higher 2%.</p>
<p>X4 640 4C/4T compares to i3-540 2C/4T, the performance is different by benchmark software identity.</p>
<p>Temperature</p>
<p>System Idle - 31~32</p>
<p><img src="http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/1877/intel2010dt1.png" alt="intel2010dt1.png" /></p>
<p>CPU Full Speed - 52~57</p>
<p>Intel Burn Test v2.4?Stress Level Maximum</p>
<p><img src="http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/4535/intel2010dt2.png" alt="intel2010dt2.png" /></p>
<p>The latest 32nm manufacture is really helpful for the temperature. </p>
<p>Even though the original cooler is thin, the full speed temperature is still under 60.</p>
<p>After enabling C1E, the temperature even goes lower. The idle status is only 19~22. Core i3 is very good at idle temperature.</p>
<p>Power Consumption</p>
<p>System Idle - 52W</p>
<p><img src="http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/1884/intel2010didle.jpg" alt="intel2010didle.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254992</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254992</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:47:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2010 Mainstream DIY PC Reference – Intel Platform OC Performance Guide on Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:34:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It’s been years for users to select different components to make own DIY PC.</p>
<p>Advantage of DIY is freedom. </p>
<p>Comparing to brand PC, there is only one brand to provide after service.</p>
<p>The DIY PC can have the vendors or distributors warranty.</p>
<p>For this warranty, you have to go to different service center by different components. </p>
<p>However, you can choose your favorite brands and suitable products.</p>
<p>This is the main reason for DIY PC users are interested in computer technology or studying before buying.</p>
<p>Windwithme also mentioned in previous article that most DIY PC users are concerned about budget. </p>
<p>So they set the budget first and search for suitable products.</p>
<p>This review is introducing Intel platform with built-in GPU to make a good C/P PC.</p>
<p><img src="http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/1960/intel201001.jpg" alt="intel201001.jpg" /></p>
<p>Last review is AMD mainstream PC guide.</p>
<p>This time, I will use similar budget to compare the Intel platform.</p>
<p>My original idea was putting Intel and AMD PC in one article. </p>
<p>However, the content is too long, so I divided into 2 parts. </p>
<p>If you are interested, you can compare to these 2 guides. </p>
<p>I believe you can have more idea for current mainstream hardware performance and price. </p>
<p>Also, it can help you to make decision before buying.</p>
<p>CPU Part</p>
<p>I use Intel current hot sell model Core i3-540.</p>
<p>3.06GHz, 32nm manufacturing, 4MB L3 Cache, Revision K0.</p>
<p>Physical 2 Cores with Hyper-Threading for 4 threading, called 2C/4T.</p>
<p>K0 version is adding ID(PCID) technology into processor.</p>
<p>Most users all hope new version can be better at OC.</p>
<p>The price is 3350NTD, around 112USD.</p>
<p><img src="http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/5245/intel201002.jpg" alt="intel201002.jpg" /></p>
<p>Inside Box</p>
<p>Product manual, original cooler, Intel Core i3-540</p>
<p><img src="http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/6497/intel201003.jpg" alt="intel201003.jpg" /></p>
<p>Upper-Right is cooler bottom. It’s 100% aluminum also with thermal pate in the bottom.</p>
<p>Lower-Left is Intel Core i3-540. LGA 1156 Socket. </p>
<p>It’s recommended for H55/H57 chipsets.</p>
<p>You also can use P55 chipset, but the GPU function will be disable.</p>
<p><img src="http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/4052/intel201004.jpg" alt="intel201004.jpg" /></p>
<p>DRAM Part</p>
<p>Recently, the DDR3 4GB price is very cheap. You can choose 2GBX2 or 4GBX2.</p>
<p>If you have more budget and plan to use 64Bit OS, 4GBX2 is better pick.</p>
<p>I use CORSAIR DDR3 1600 4GBX2. 1600 version price is a little higher.</p>
<p>CORSAIR is internal well-known brand and famous in quality control. The price is acceptable.</p>
<p>The price is around 115USD.</p>
<p><img src="http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/898/intel201005.jpg" alt="intel201005.jpg" /></p>
<p>CORSAIR CMX8GX3M2A1600C9</p>
<p>Core i3 can support DDR3 1333 without OC.</p>
<p>For Intel platform, you just pull CPU clock, the DDR3 can reach 1600~1800.</p>
<p>If your budget is limited, you can use DDR3 1333 or 2GX2.</p>
<p><img src="http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/3566/intel201006.jpg" alt="intel201006.jpg" /></p>
<p>MB Part</p>
<p>H55 or H57 chipsets are first choice for Intel built-in GPU platform.</p>
<p>The main difference is H57 supporting Raid, but H55 price is lower. </p>
<p>You can find many models and spec in the market.</p>
<p>I choose mid-price GIGABYTE H55M-UD2H. it’s 3500NTD, around 117USD.</p>
<p>GIGABYTE GA-H55M-UD2H Look</p>
<p>Ultra Durable 3, 2oz copper PCB, 100% Japanese made capacitors</p>
<p>3x USB Power supports On/Off Charge which can charge iPhone, iPad and iPod touch easily.</p>
<p>USB 3x Power also provide more stable power to external USB devices.</p>
<p><img src="http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/828/intel201007.jpg" alt="intel201007.jpg" /></p>
<p>CPU PWM 4+2 phases</p>
<p>2 X PCI-E X16 supports ATI Hybrid CrossFireX technology. </p>
<p>The bandwidth is X16+X4.</p>
<p>Audio chip is Realtek ALC892. It supports 7.1 channel and Dolby Home Theater surrounding technology.</p>
<p>GIGABYTE also has another model, H55M-S2V, spec and components are lower. The price is 700NTD cheaper, around 24USD.</p>
<p><img src="http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/8477/intel201008.jpg" alt="intel201008.jpg" /></p>
<p>Power Supply Part</p>
<p>I pick Be Quiet! Straight Power Deluxe 400W which is E6 product line.</p>
<p>The price is 2400NTD, around 80USD.</p>
<p><img src="http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8333/intel201009.jpg" alt="intel201009.jpg" /></p>
<p>80Plus Copper Certificate, Active PFC design, 18dBA super silent 12cm fan, 5 years warranty.</p>
<p>If you only use PC for word processing and no more graphic card upgrade need, you can consider Be Quiet! L6 350W.</p>
<p><img src="http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/8611/intel201010.jpg" alt="intel201010.jpg" /></p>
<p>HDD still use WD 640AAKS. The cheap price is main advantage even the performance is not the best.</p>
<p>If you need more capacity, currently 1T~1.5T HDD price is only a little higher. You just need to study the HD performance more.</p>
<p>In Intel platform, CPU and MB price are few hundred NTD higher.</p>
<p>If including Case, DVD-ROM, the price is around 16260NTD, 524USD.</p>
<p>Many users trust in Intel brand or performance due to the Intel structure.</p>
<p>The configuration is not absolute. </p>
<p>If you don’t need such high performance, you can pick cheaper one.</p>
<p>However, if you need higher performance, you can buy the better spec one.</p>
<p>Per your need, budget and brand, you can make your own configuration to enjoy the DIY fun.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254991</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/254991</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:34:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>