<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Link: <a href="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTIzMywxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==">[H] Enthusiast - AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform Review</a></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_1_2_l.jpg" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_1_2_l.jpg" /></p>
<p>Appena ho un po' di tempo vedo di tradurla un pochino...</p>
<p>ma intanto ecco qualche immagine:</p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_2_1_l.jpg" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_2_1_l.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_7_l.jpg" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_7_l.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_8_l.jpg" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_8_l.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_14.jpg" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_14.jpg" /></p>
<p>Testing Setup:</p>
<p>PROCESSOR: AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 - Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 - Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800</p>
<p>MOTHERBOARD: ASUS L1N64-SLI WS nForce 680a - Pre-Production IntelÂ<img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="®" alt="®" /> BadAxe 2 Desktop Mother Board D975XBX 2</p>
<p>GRAPHICS CARD: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTX</p>
<p>GRAPHICS DRIVER: 97.02</p>
<p>MEMORY: 4x1GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8888 C4 at 4-4-4-12</p>
<p>HARD DRIVE: Seagate Barracuda 160GB 7200.10 7200RPM</p>
<p>OPTICAL DRIVE: Sony DVD-ROM DDU1615</p>
<p>OPERATING SYSTEM: Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2</p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_5_4.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_5_4.gif" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_6_2.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_6_2.gif" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_8_2.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_8_2.gif" /></p>
<p>Un po' di Multitasking:</p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_10_1.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_10_1.gif" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_10_2.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_10_2.gif" /></p>
<p>E parlando di consumi...</p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_11_5.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_11_5.gif" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/1630/amd-athlon-64-fx-74-quad-fx-platform</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 23:40:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/1630.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:23:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform on Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:46:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>gianni1879 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>per me questa soluzione se la possono tenere visti anche i consumi, almeno fino all'arrivo del k8l...<p>troooppo esagerati nei consumi non Ã¨ cosa per la quale e poi oltretutto le prestazioni sono ancora dietro.... ormai ci vuole la nuovo architettura.... <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/wink.png.981122a168c49b836247b5559b1cdcb0.png" alt=";)" /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>ti quoto in toto! consumi stellari (e ci credo sono 4fx che rullano) e prestazioni figlie di un'architettura non piÃ¹ al passo di quella intel! speriamo nei k8l...<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51284</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51284</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[apix_1024]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:46:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform on Sat, 02 Dec 2006 13:23:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>per me questa soluzione se la possono tenere visti anche i consumi, almeno fino all'arrivo del k8l...</p>
<p>troooppo esagerati nei consumi non Ã¨ cosa per la quale e poi oltretutto le prestazioni sono ancora dietro.... ormai ci vuole la nuovo architettura.... <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/wink.png.981122a168c49b836247b5559b1cdcb0.png" alt=";)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51283</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51283</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gianni1879]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 13:23:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform on Fri, 01 Dec 2006 23:47:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>forse farano un kit con le 2 cpu da 1500 dollari, la MB ed una serie di ruote con criceto che fungono da dinamo per il risparmio energetico.. si vocifera che i criceti si potranno overclokkare per erogare elettriciÃ  fino a 2kw( solo sui modelli DELUXE con criceta davanti ai maski...)...</p>
<p><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/59.gif.dc9f37bab5f547d29854356d2212d6df.gif" alt=":fiufiu:" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51282</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51282</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eduw2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 23:47:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform on Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:32:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Bello Ã¨ bello....ma per ora come ogni quadri core rimane sullo scaffale.<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/59.gif.dc9f37bab5f547d29854356d2212d6df.gif" alt=":fiufiu:" /></p>
<p>Ciao;)</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51281</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51281</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dj883u2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:32:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:21:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>principino1984 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>beh, diciamo che per ora AMD deve usare due processori per stare dietro ad intel, e questo va a favore della enel che nn vede l'ora di alimentare questi nuovi succhia energia elettrica da piÃ¹ di un kw... <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/haveaniceday.gif.4a0d5fe4670b49a7c5311f77997c58cf.gif" alt=":haveaniceday:" />
<p>Marco</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/grin.gif.3e001a1751d5ca14fbd0ba2a6c0e4286.gif" alt=";D" /> ;D <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/grin.gif.3e001a1751d5ca14fbd0ba2a6c0e4286.gif" alt=";D" /> ;D </p>
<p>cmq che razza di cose , per salire in qualche classifica ....</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51280</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51280</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[megthebest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:21:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:49:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>bCyclon ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>amd vince nei giochi...ma nel resto intel domina..
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Ma dove? <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/confused.png.1268e67724eeff1d2e5126476e482704.png" alt=":confused:" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51279</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51279</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SACD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:49:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:35:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Deos ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>
<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">Diciamo che per quanto l'architettura sia piu che ottima non e riuscita a distaccare di molto AMD che con questo finto Quad sembra cmq reggere bene ............... certo i punteggi premiano il QX6700 ma se tieni conto dell'architettura che non ha nemmeno un anno ............. contro il K8 che povero ne ha ben di piu .................. </span><p><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">Non oso immaginare quando AMD tirera fuori il nuovo core K8L o K10 o Intel tirera fuori york </span><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/rolleyes.png.7b700728ea24bf9ae3bcf30b05a95d57.png" alt=":rolleyes:" /><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">:rolleyes:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">Deos</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>beh, diciamo che per ora AMD deve usare due processori per stare dietro ad intel, e questo va a favore della enel che nn vede l'ora di alimentare questi nuovi succhia energia elettrica da piÃ¹ di un kw... <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/haveaniceday.gif.4a0d5fe4670b49a7c5311f77997c58cf.gif" alt=":haveaniceday:" /></p>
<p>Marco</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51278</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51278</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[principino1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:35:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:52:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>da panico:eek: <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/eek2.gif.a661fa1beef8e763575f6418135871ca.gif" alt=":eek:" /> :eek: </p>
<p>ma con un fx-74 e uno SLi di 8800 quanto si consuma..... non ce la fa ne4anche un ali da 1kw!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51277</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51277</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[derapage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:52:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:41:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Mamma mia...</p>
<p>Spettacolo !!!  <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51276</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51276</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lordh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:41:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform on Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:23:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Link: <a href="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTIzMywxLCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==">[H] Enthusiast - AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 &amp; Quad FX Platform Review</a></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_1_2_l.jpg" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_1_2_l.jpg" /></p>
<p>Appena ho un po' di tempo vedo di tradurla un pochino...</p>
<p>ma intanto ecco qualche immagine:</p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_2_1_l.jpg" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_2_1_l.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_7_l.jpg" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_7_l.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_8_l.jpg" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_8_l.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_14.jpg" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_3_14.jpg" /></p>
<p>Testing Setup:</p>
<p>PROCESSOR: AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 - Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 - Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800</p>
<p>MOTHERBOARD: ASUS L1N64-SLI WS nForce 680a - Pre-Production IntelÂ<img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/00ae.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--registered" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="®" alt="®" /> BadAxe 2 Desktop Mother Board D975XBX 2</p>
<p>GRAPHICS CARD: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTX</p>
<p>GRAPHICS DRIVER: 97.02</p>
<p>MEMORY: 4x1GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8888 C4 at 4-4-4-12</p>
<p>HARD DRIVE: Seagate Barracuda 160GB 7200.10 7200RPM</p>
<p>OPTICAL DRIVE: Sony DVD-ROM DDU1615</p>
<p>OPERATING SYSTEM: Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2</p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_5_4.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_5_4.gif" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_6_2.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_6_2.gif" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_8_2.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_8_2.gif" /></p>
<p>Un po' di Multitasking:</p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_10_1.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_10_1.gif" /></p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_10_2.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_10_2.gif" /></p>
<p>E parlando di consumi...</p>
<p><img src="http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/images/articles/1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_11_5.gif" alt="1164762316TkkLXtB7nv_11_5.gif" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51275</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/51275</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[principino1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:23:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>