<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Gf104, gf106, gf108]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Visto che non c'è un thread dedicato riporto questa notizia, da fonte che si è confermata molto attendibile su nVIDIA negli ultimi tempi. Estraggo i punti salienti per comodità, per leggere tutto c'è il link in fondo:</p>
<blockquote>
<div> the architecture [...] hasn't been changed much.
<p>[...]</p>
<p>Since GF100 is quite modular, it can be cut into four parts easily, that is exactly what happened. No shrinks, no updates, and no better chance of economic viability until TSMC comes through with 28nm wafers in mid-2011. <strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">Maybe.</span></strong> The magic 8-ball of semiconductor process tech just laughed when asked if 28nm would be on time.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>The new dice are 3/4s of a GF100 for the GF104, 1/2 GF100 for the GF106, and 1/4 GF100 for the GF108. Using a bit of math brings us the GF104 with 384 shaders and a 256 bit memory bus, GF106 has 256 shaders and a 192 bit bus, and GF108 has 128 shaders and a 128 bit bus.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>Word has it that Nvidia is basically adding a bit of pixel fill capacity to make it competitive on DX10 performance [...] Performance of GF10x is said to be very close to GF100 on a per-shader basis, and a bit better than GF100 on older games.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>It looks like the initial GF104s are going to have at least one block of 32 shaders disabled if not two.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>When will they be coming out? Originally, the GF104 was slated for a Computex launch, but that didn't happen. Contrary to rumors started by people not actually at the show (<strong>si riferisce a Theo Valich</strong>, NdRatatosk), there were no GF104s at Computex, and partners had not received samples yet. This means launch slipped from June to mid-July at the earliest, maybe later.</p>
<p>GF106 was supposed to launch about the same time as GF104, so it may be out at the same time as well. GF108 originally had an August launch, but that slipped a month as well to September.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/06/21/what-are-nvidias-gf104-gf106-and-gf108/">SemiAccurate :: What are Nvidia's GF104, GF106 and GF108?</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/14950/gf104-gf106-gf108</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 03:44:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/14950.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 06:27:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:11:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>e le montano su tutti i pc assemblati acer hp e compagnia bella... che pur di scrivere 1GB di ram video dedicata son disposti a mettere una scheda video discreta dedicata che va peggio di quella integrata.</p>
<p>Poi ricordiamo che la serie high end 1366 non ha grafica integrata... tutti gli sviluppatori che hanno bisogno di una cpu high end hanno bisogno di una vga discreta low end (a meno di non dovere sfruttare librerire cuda et similia)</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218254</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218254</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Le085]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:11:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:54:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Beh in ambito mainstream nei pc da mercatone faranno furore. Non immaginate quanta gente compra i pc dai vari MW, Saturn, etc... E anche nei loro scaffali si trovano quelle schede... hanno ancora ATI 4650, Geffo 6800... ed è strabiliante vedere gente comprare a 70-80 euro queste schede.</p>
<p>Se hanno intenzione di sviluppare e vendere il low end vuol dire che il loro mercato (guadagno) sicuramente ce l'hanno.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218253</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218253</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Slime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:54:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:25:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Le085 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Beh le altre piattaforme gireranno ancora per molto.. prima di avere gpu integrate in ogni pc ce ne vorrà ancora parecchio... pero' di certo i volumi di vendita potrebbero calare molto.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Sì, le piattaforme rimarranno "in circolo" a lungo, ma nessuno fa upgrade per mettere una nuova VGA low-end, quindi il mercato sarebbe comunque molto molto ristretto, almeno in USA e UE ovviamente.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218252</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218252</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:25:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:10:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Ratatosk ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Facciamo un po' di conti...
<p>SB coprirà tutta la parte bassa del mercato GPU, rendendo inutili le VGA entry level di AMD e nVidia.</p>
<p>Bobcat e Llano faranno esattamente la stessa cosa per quanto riguarda la parte AMD del mercato delle CPU (ok, Bobcat sarà complessivamente meno potente mentre Llano avrà una parte grafica decisamente migliore, ma il concetto è chiaro).</p>
<p>Quindi le discrete entry level a cosa servono? Per capirsi meglio GF108 nel giro di 6 mesi da oggi sarà del tutto inutile, così come Cedar e il suo sotituto nella serie HD6000. Ora se GF108 esce a ottobre avrà 3 mesi di vita, mentre Cedar2 (non mi ricordo come si chiama) avrà una vita utile di circa 0 mesi. Che li sviluppano a fare? Mi sfugge qualcosa?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Beh le altre piattaforme gireranno ancora per molto.. prima di avere gpu integrate in ogni pc ce ne vorrà ancora parecchio... pero' di certo i volumi di vendita potrebbero calare molto.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218251</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218251</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Le085]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:10:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:35:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Intanto proliferano le segnalazioni di utenti con problemi con le 460, con le schede che vanno in thermal throttling e scendono a 500MHz anche in condizioni di carico praticamente nullo (desktop di windows).</p>
<p>La cosa è inquietante e marca anche GF104 come un chip piuttosto "tirato". L'ipotesi di una 475 con GF104 pompato era già campata in aria prima (la fonte è Fudzilla), ma ora può dirsi se non definitivamente, quasi, insensata...</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218250</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218250</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:35:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:53:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Facciamo un po' di conti...</p>
<p>SB coprirà tutta la parte bassa del mercato GPU, rendendo inutili le VGA entry level di AMD e nVidia.</p>
<p>Bobcat e Llano faranno esattamente la stessa cosa per quanto riguarda la parte AMD del mercato delle CPU (ok, Bobcat sarà complessivamente meno potente mentre Llano avrà una parte grafica decisamente migliore, ma il concetto è chiaro).</p>
<p>Quindi le discrete entry level a cosa servono? Per capirsi meglio GF108 nel giro di 6 mesi da oggi sarà del tutto inutile, così come Cedar e il suo sotituto nella serie HD6000. Ora se GF108 esce a ottobre avrà 3 mesi di vita, mentre Cedar2 (non mi ricordo come si chiama) avrà una vita utile di circa 0 mesi. Che li sviluppano a fare? Mi sfugge qualcosa?</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218249</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218249</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 10:53:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:25:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Da Softpedia:</p>
<p><em>Now, according to a certain report, the 259.47 driver, dated August 21, lists, in the supported card section, more than just the GeForce 6, 7, 8, 9,100, 200, 300 and the known 400 cards.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>Apparently, the new driver will work with GeForce GTS 450/455 video boards, GT 440/430/420 models and a whole slew of GT 400M series.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>The one card from the list that has been detailed by previous rumors is the GTS 450 and will supposedly have 1GB GDDR5, an interface of 128 bits, 192 CUDA cores and clocks of 783 MHz for the GPU and 3,608 MHz for the memory.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>Still, the list includes many names besides just this one and goes as follows.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0E23.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GTS 455)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DC4.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DC5.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DC0.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GT 440)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DE1.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GT 430)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DE2.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GT 420)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0E30.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DD1.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DD2.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DD3.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DF2.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M) </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DF0.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DF3.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DF1.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M)</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>NVIDIA_DEV.0DEE.01 (NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M)</em></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218248</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218248</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lowenz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:25:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:43:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="http://vr-zone.com/articles/-rumour-nvidia-geforce-gt-430-releasing-october-12th/9724.html">http://vr-zone.com/articles/-rumour-nvidia-geforce-gt-430-releasing-october-12th/9724.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218247</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218247</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:43:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:16:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>doppio <img src="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f615.png?v=e1a18355660" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--confused" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":/" alt="😕" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218246</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218246</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:16:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:15:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://resources.vr-zone.com/newvr/image.php?m=540&amp;s=http://resources.vr-zone.com//uploads/9709/asus-geforce-gts-450.jpg" alt="asus-geforce-gts-450.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="http://vr-zone.com/articles/nvidia-geforce-gts-450-pictured/9709.html">http://vr-zone.com/articles/nvidia-geforce-gts-450-pictured/9709.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218245</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218245</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:15:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:15:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>bene sarà postate quanto prima</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218244</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218244</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:15:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:51:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="http://vr-zone.com/articles/-rumour-nvidia-geforce-gts-450-features-192-sp-release-on-september-13th/9687.html">http://vr-zone.com/articles/-rumour-nvidia-geforce-gts-450-features-192-sp-release-on-september-13th/9687.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218243</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218243</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:51:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 06:09:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ecco anche l'ultimo (GF108):</p>
<p><img src="http://resources.vr-zone.com/newvr/image.php?m=540&amp;s=http://resources.vr-zone.com//uploads/9555/1zdp3xx.jpg" alt="1zdp3xx.jpg" /></p>
<p><em>The die size is estimated at roughly 130 mm2. It would make sense for GF106 to be half-GF104, or 192 SP, and GF108 to be half-GF106, or 96 SP. </em></p>
<p>Il resto dell'articolo: <a href="http://vr-zone.com/articles/nvidia-gf108-die-shot-leaked/9555.html">http://vr-zone.com/articles/nvidia-gf108-die-shot-leaked/9555.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218242</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218242</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 06:09:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:13:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Die molto molto grosso per GF106 (non che non ce lo aspettassimo, vista l'architettura ormai nota)</p>
<p><img src="http://resources.vr-zone.net/newvr/image.php?m=540&amp;s=http://resources.vr-zone.net//uploads/9545/ceCoAoiucmOzM.jpg" alt="ceCoAoiucmOzM.jpg" /></p>
<p><em>ZOL measured the die at 15.3mm and 15.7mm sides, which translates to a die area between 240 mm2</em></p>
<p>Il resto dell'articolo: <a href="http://vr-zone.com/articles/nvidia-gf106-die-shots-leaked/9545.html">http://vr-zone.com/articles/nvidia-gf106-die-shots-leaked/9545.html</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218241</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218241</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:13:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:47:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Slime ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Se Nvidia non si sveglia sul settore consumer mi sa che so dolori sto giro...</div>
</blockquote>
<p>se continuano così, ora che nvidia butta fuori una vga entry DX11, ATI avrà già presentato tutta la serie HD6000...</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218240</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218240</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[delly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:47:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:42:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Ratatosk ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>La cosa particolarmente preoccupante è che è roba DX10, quindi probabilmente si tratta ancora del vecchio G86 rinominato per 500esima volta -.-</div>
</blockquote>
<p>solo 500volte??<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" />:asd:</p>
<p>cmq quoto...mah...veramente incredibili...mi chiedo fino a quando andranno avanti così...:boh:</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218239</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218239</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[delly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:42:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:32:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Se Nvidia non si sveglia sul settore consumer mi sa che so dolori sto giro...</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218238</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218238</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Slime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:32:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>delly ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>rebrand???:cheazz:
<p>ma che è il rebrand...<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/59.gif.dc9f37bab5f547d29854356d2212d6df.gif" alt=":fiufiu:" /></p>
<p><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" />:asd:</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>La cosa particolarmente preoccupante è che è roba DX10, quindi probabilmente si tratta ancora del vecchio G86 rinominato per 500esima volta -.-</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218237</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218237</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:30:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:14:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>rebrand???:cheazz:</p>
<p>ma che è il rebrand...<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/59.gif.dc9f37bab5f547d29854356d2212d6df.gif" alt=":fiufiu:" /></p>
<p><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" />:asd:</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218236</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218236</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[delly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:14:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Wed, 04 Aug 2010 06:49:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Il low end sembra navigare sempre in acque tobide, con l'ennesimo rebrand:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.semiaccurate.com/static/uploads/2010/08_august/Asus_Nvidia_425M_1.png" alt="Asus_Nvidia_425M_1.png" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.semiaccurate.com/static/uploads/2010/08_august/Asus_Nvidia_425M_2.png" alt="Asus_Nvidia_425M_2.png" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.semiaccurate.com/2010/08/03/nvidia-gt-425m-tips-listings/">SemiAccurate :: Nvidia GT 425M tips up in listings</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218235</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218235</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 06:49:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:13:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>apix_1024 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>rincari la dose?? <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/muro.gif.6709e291b079e93924b744bfde44f3a4.gif" alt=":muro:" />:muro:<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/muro.gif.6709e291b079e93924b744bfde44f3a4.gif" alt=":muro:" />
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>XD</p>
<p>ho visto, su xs, benchati sotto farcry e altro 1ghz di core <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/2.gif.2043ee2724a060186c423c06c6828098.gif" alt=":gluglu:" /></p>
<p>schedoneeee</p>
<p>cmq aspetto peccato, davvero peccato che si sono svegliati tardi senno l'avevo di sicuro nel pc</p>
<p>ottime schede</p>
<p>aspetto di vedere le gf106, anche se da quelle nn mi aspetto molto :=)</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218234</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218234</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devil_Mcry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:13:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:32:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>GF106:</p>
<p><img src="http://resources.vr-zone.com/newvr/image.php?m=540&amp;s=http://resources.vr-zone.com//uploads/9453/4502.jpg" alt="4502.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://resources.vr-zone.com/newvr/image.php?m=540&amp;s=http://resources.vr-zone.com//uploads/9453/450.jpg" alt="450.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="http://vr-zone.com/articles/nvidia-geforce-gts-450-pcb-blueprint-leaked/9453.html">NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 PCB Blueprint Leaked by VR-Zone.com | COMPUTEX 2010</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218233</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218233</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratatosk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:32:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:20:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Devil_Mcry ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>sicuramente l'attuale best buy
<p>anche per gli smanettoni <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
<p>passare da 675 a 950mhz di core da una certa soddisfazione <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>rincari la dose?? <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/muro.gif.6709e291b079e93924b744bfde44f3a4.gif" alt=":muro:" />:muro:<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/muro.gif.6709e291b079e93924b744bfde44f3a4.gif" alt=":muro:" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218232</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218232</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[apix_1024]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:20:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gf104, gf106, gf108 on Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:24:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>sicuramente l'attuale best buy</p>
<p>anche per gli smanettoni <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
<p>passare da 675 a 950mhz di core da una certa soddisfazione <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218231</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/218231</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devil_Mcry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:24:20 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>