<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Analytic cooler for the best buy of Intel Micro ATX with Core i3-530]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the past as far as built-in GPU platforms were concerned, Intel usually used “G Series” to name its products. </p>
<p>G45 or G41 as Intel’s main chipset were commonly seen in the market in the last generation. </p>
<p>At the beginning of 2010, Intel released new “All in one PC” structure, and firstly introduced the new technology that GPU was directly built in the CPU.</p>
<p>Moreover, Intel improved its CPU to 32nm process, and also released a series of CPUs that support the platform. </p>
<p>At present, there are 6 CPUs in the market: low-level Pentium G6950; mid-level Core i3 530/540; and high-level Core i5 650/660/661/670. </p>
<p>As to MB chipset, Intel released H55/H57 to support new CPU design, and the main difference was with and without RAID function.</p>
<p>Therefore, this time I am going to build a Micro ATX PC based upon Intel’s new structure.</p>
<p>As to CPU:</p>
<p>I choose Intel Core i3 530, with 73W and the latest 32nm process. </p>
<p>The code name is Clarkdale, with clock 2.93GHz, L2 2 x 256KB and L3 4MB. The price was about USD about 120. </p>
<p>The OEM coolers of Clarkdale series are all non-copper bottom design, so I infer that copper bottom is not definitely necessary for dual-core CPU with 32nm.</p>
<p><img src="http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/3440/bh55v01.jpg" alt="bh55v01.jpg" /></p>
<p>The main difference between Core i3 530 and Pentium G6950 is that the former supports HT technology; </p>
<p>higher-level Clarkdale i5 also supports TurboBoost auto-overclocking technology.</p>
<p><img src="http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/3875/bh55v02.jpg" alt="bh55v02.jpg" /></p>
<p>As to DRAM:</p>
<p>I choose American brand CORSAIR TWIN3X4G-1333C9A. </p>
<p>Its capacity is 2GB X 2, and the clock 1333 CL9 9-9-24 1.50V. The price is about USD about 75. </p>
<p><img src="http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/5629/bh55v03.jpg" alt="bh55v03.jpg" /></p>
<p>CORSAIR has unique DDR3 heat sink, and the appearance and quality are also good.</p>
<p><img src="http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/9717/bh55v04.jpg" alt="bh55v04.jpg" /></p>
<p>As to MB:</p>
<p>I use H55 chipset—BIOSTAR H55 HD, with higher C/P. </p>
<p>There are no whole solid capacitors, no USB3, and no sumptuous material on this mothboard, </p>
<p>but the price of the product is the lowest in H55 market, about USD 57.</p>
<p>BIOSTAR has another TH55B HD, with 4 DIMM DDR3 and high C/P, and the price is only USD 90.</p>
<p><img src="http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/9135/bh55v05.jpg" alt="bh55v05.jpg" /></p>
<p>Recently BIOSTAR seems to like using red as material colour, making products more impressive.</p>
<p><img src="http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/8133/bh55v06.jpg" alt="bh55v06.jpg" /></p>
<p>If this H55 MB can adopt Japanese electrolytic capacitors, I think this product can be more perfect.</p>
<p><img src="http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/9133/bh55v07.jpg" alt="bh55v07.jpg" /></p>
<p>As to Power Supply:</p>
<p>Judging from Intel’s latest 32nm platform, because of built-in GPU, I observe the power consumption of the whole system is low. </p>
<p>Antec’s latest Neo ECO 400W is chosen, so the power supply will be enough to add VGA card higher than mid-level. </p>
<p>The price is about USD about 55.</p>
<p><img src="http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/1781/bh55v08.jpg" alt="bh55v08.jpg" /></p>
<p>The power supply uses Japanese high-performance capacitors and quiet 12-centimetre fan with 2 Ball Bearing; this product is also 80 PLUS certified.</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/1118/bh55v09.jpg" alt="bh55v09.jpg" /></p>
<p>Test Platform:</p>
<p>CPU: Intel Core i3 530 ES</p>
<p>MB: BIOSTAR H55 HD</p>
<p>DRAM: CORSAIR TWIN3X4G-1333C9A</p>
<p>VGA: Intel Clarkdale 733MHz</p>
<p>HD: WD 6400AAKS 640GB</p>
<p>POWER: Antec Neo ECO 400W</p>
<p>Cooler: Intel OEM Cooler</p>
<p>OS: Windows7 Ultimate 64bit</p>
<p><img src="http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/30/bh55v10.jpg" alt="bh55v10.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/14254/analytic-cooler-for-the-best-buy-of-intel-micro-atx-with-core-i3-530</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:12:23 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/14254.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:38:23 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Analytic cooler for the best buy of Intel Micro ATX with Core i3-530 on Sun, 25 Apr 2010 03:35:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>StreetFighter IV Benchmark</p>
<p>800 X 600 =&gt; 34.31FPS</p>
<p><img src="http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/3839/bh55vosf4.png" alt="bh55vosf4.png" /></p>
<p>The clock of Clarkdale GPU from 700Mhz to 933Mhz is to be some help on 3D performance. </p>
<p>As for test results from previous two software, 3D performance leaves about 20% to be desired. </p>
<p>But if you still need more 3D performance, I recommend that buying VGA to upgrade your system is a better choice.</p>
<p>Temperature Test:</p>
<p>System standby: - 38/33</p>
<p><img src="http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/4809/bh55votemp1.png" alt="bh55votemp1.png" /></p>
<p>OCCT full loading: - 68/62</p>
<p><img src="http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/7127/bh55votemp2.png" alt="bh55votemp2.png" /></p>
<p>In the test what I install is OEM cooler, and the above temperature values are low. </p>
<p>If you install a higher-level cooler, the result which is less 10? ~ 20? than the above temperature values may appear.</p>
<p>Power Consumption Test:</p>
<p>System standby: - 63W</p>
<p><img src="http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/6663/bh55voidle.jpg" alt="bh55voidle.jpg" /></p>
<p>OCCT full loading: - 105W</p>
<p>Intel Burn Test v2.4?Stress Level High</p>
<p><img src="http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/9433/bh55vofull.jpg" alt="bh55vofull.jpg" /></p>
<p>If you don’t install VGA or too many other computer peripherals, the power consumption of 32nm-Clarkdale normally doesn’t exceed 100W. </p>
<p>Although overclocking results in a bit more power consumption, the range observed from the test is not high.</p>
<p>DDR3 Bandwidth Test:</p>
<p>DRAM DDR3 1337.6 CL8 8-8-24 1T</p>
<p>Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 11169 MB/s</p>
<p>EVEREST Memory Read - 8746 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/5018/bh55vd1333mem.png" alt="bh55vd1333mem.png" /></p>
<p>DDR3 1802.6 CL11 11-11-30 1T</p>
<p>Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 14851 MB/s</p>
<p>EVEREST Memory Read - 11310 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/743/bh55vd1800mem.png" alt="bh55vd1800mem.png" /></p>
<p>DRAM DDR3 1602 CL8 8-8-24 1T</p>
<p>Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 15509 MB/s</p>
<p>EVEREST Memory Read - 12131 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/9961/bh55vo2000mem.png" alt="bh55vo2000mem.png" /></p>
<p>As far as DDR3 bandwidth is concerned, Clarkdale platform doesn’t show better performance than 45nm Core i5/i7. </p>
<p>However compared with LAG 775 and AMD’s two platforms, Clarkdale is still better. </p>
<p>And about voltage, Clarkdale is better than the previous platforms; DDR3 1800 can run steadily under only 1.60V. </p>
<p>After the test of CORSAIR’s introductory DDR3 product, I find it has nice overclocking ability.</p>
<p>With the limit no more than 1.308V, CPU still can be overclocked to 4.2GHz with OEM cooler.</p>
<p>Hyper 4 X PI 1M=&gt; 16.109s</p>
<p>CPUMARK 99=&gt; 647</p>
<p><img src="http://img532.imageshack.us/img532/3235/bh55vo42g.png" alt="bh55vo42g.png" /></p>
<p>Intel Core i3-530 CPU has very high C/P, and its performance, temperature, and power consumption are satisfactory. </p>
<p>Especially overclocking, the clock raised to about 4GHz need not too high voltage and higher-level cooler. </p>
<p>The process technology of 32nm makes Intel CPU products more competitive. I sincerely hope Intel releases quad-core CPU with 32nm soon.</p>
<p>Most prices of H55 MB are about NT$3500 ~ 4200 (about US$110 ~ 113). </p>
<p>If MB manufacturers can lower prices 10% ~ 20%, I believe H55 MB will be more popular and universal.</p>
<p>BIOSTAR products mainly focus on parity and overclocking. </p>
<p>This time the price of BIOSTAR H55 is also friendly, deserving much praise.</p>
<p><img src="http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/4453/bh55v11.jpg" alt="bh55v11.jpg" /></p>
<p>Intel releases the latest structure IGP platform in 2010, and releases a series of many product lines so that consumers have more choices. </p>
<p>At present the prices of H57 chipset and high-level i5 CPU are too high, but H55 and introductory Pentium G6950 or Core i3 530 still have very high C/P.</p>
<p>After the appearance of Intel Clarkdale platform, one condition has changed in Micro ATX PC market for a few years: </p>
<p>in the past if consumers wanted to choose IGP with higher 3D performance, they usually intended to choose AMD platforms. </p>
<p>But now in 2010 Intel begins to focus more on this market, and also has excellent competitiveness.</p>
<p>Besides some products I use in this test, you can buy HDD and case so as to build a nice small PC machine. </p>
<p>Every consumer of course has his or her favourite brand or budget concerned, so building a PC can be adjustable according to marketing sale.</p>
<p>Finally I hope this article can be a good reference to this kind of product information. Thank you!</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/203876</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/203876</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 03:35:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Analytic cooler for the best buy of Intel Micro ATX with Core i3-530 on Sun, 25 Apr 2010 03:07:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>OCCT full loading: - 82W</p>
<p>Intel Burn Test v2.4?Stress Level High</p>
<p><img src="http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/8017/bh55vdfull.jpg" alt="bh55vdfull.jpg" /></p>
<p>With 32nm new technology, Intel has an advantageous position in the aspect of power consumption. </p>
<p>After overclocking, power consumption is 39W under stand by, and only 82W under full loading. </p>
<p>Clarkdale structure’s low power consumption is satisfactory.</p>
<p>Overclocking Performance Test:</p>
<p>CPU 180.3 X 22 =&gt; 3966MHz</p>
<p>DDR3 1802.6 CL11 11-11-30 1T</p>
<p>VGA 945MHz</p>
<p>BIOS Setup Utility:</p>
<p><img src="http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/4641/bh55vb1.jpg" alt="bh55vb1.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/2808/bh55vb2.jpg" alt="bh55vb2.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/881/bh55vb3.jpg" alt="bh55vb3.jpg" /></p>
<p>BIOSTAR H55 HD, like other mid-level H55 products, also has many options for user to overclock. </p>
<p>However, as an introductory product, the range of voltage is not wide, 3~6 levels at most. </p>
<p>But the product still shows great overclocking performance, in any case.</p>
<p>CORSAIR DDR3 also has good performance with overclocking, and the setting 1.60V can run 1800 CL11 steadily.</p>
<p>Hyper 4 X PI 32M=&gt; 16m 10.000s</p>
<p>CPUMARK 99=&gt; 612</p>
<p><img src="http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/504/bh55vopi.png" alt="bh55vopi.png" /></p>
<p>Nuclearus Multi Core =&gt; 15424</p>
<p>Fritz Chess Benchmark =&gt; 15.02/7207</p>
<p><img src="http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/919/bh55vonm.png" alt="bh55vonm.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalMark 2004R3 =&gt; 169052</p>
<p><img src="http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/699/bh55vocm.png" alt="bh55vocm.png" /></p>
<p>CINEBENCH R10</p>
<p>1 CPU=&gt; 5448</p>
<p>x CPU=&gt; 12447</p>
<p><img src="http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/6865/bh55vocb.png" alt="bh55vocb.png" /></p>
<p>PCMark Vantage =&gt; 7307</p>
<p><img src="http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/9035/bh55vopcvan.png" alt="bh55vopcvan.png" /></p>
<p>After CPU and GPU are overclocked, we can observe from previous software that performance improve 30% ~ 50%. </p>
<p>Furthermore, with OEM Cooler, 3966Mhz can also be steady under 1.212V; 32nm-CPU also shows excellent overclocking ability.</p>
<p>3DMARK2006 =&gt; 2170</p>
<p><img src="http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/4052/bh55vo3d06.png" alt="bh55vo3d06.png" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/203875</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/203875</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 03:07:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Analytic cooler for the best buy of Intel Micro ATX with Core i3-530 on Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:48:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Default Performance:</p>
<p>CPU 133.8 X 22 =&gt; 2942.9MHz</p>
<p>DRAM DDR3 1337.6 CL8 8-8-24 1T</p>
<p>GPU 733MHz 128mb</p>
<p>Hyper 4 X PI 32M=&gt; 20m 12.640s</p>
<p>CPUMARK 99=&gt; 452</p>
<p><img src="http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/7567/bh55vdpi.png" alt="bh55vdpi.png" /></p>
<p>Nuclearus Multi Core =&gt; 10881</p>
<p>Fritz Chess Benchmark =&gt; 11.18/5367</p>
<p><img src="http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/3333/bh55vdnm.png" alt="bh55vdnm.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalMark 2004R3 =&gt; 128706</p>
<p><img src="http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/4430/bh55vdcm.png" alt="bh55vdcm.png" /></p>
<p>CINEBENCH R10</p>
<p>1 CPU=&gt; 3982</p>
<p>x CPU=&gt; 9236</p>
<p><img src="http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/2632/bh55vdcb.png" alt="bh55vdcb.png" /></p>
<p>PCMark Vantage =&gt; 5541</p>
<p><img src="http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/359/bh55vdpcvan.png" alt="bh55vdpcvan.png" /></p>
<p>The platform based upon Core i3 530 basically has great performance, so it can easily deal with most software making CPU high loading. </p>
<p>It also has excellent performance to deal with HD 1080P films or file converting.</p>
<p>3DMARK2006 =&gt; 1751</p>
<p><img src="http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/4586/bh55vd3d06.png" alt="bh55vd3d06.png" /></p>
<p>StreetFighter IV Benchmark</p>
<p>800 X 600 =&gt; 27.80FPS</p>
<p><img src="http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/1416/bh55vdsf4.png" alt="bh55vdsf4.png" /></p>
<p>3D performance of Intel Clarkdale structure has been almost the same as that of 785G. </p>
<p>Intel Clarkdale can easily deal with many introductory 3D games.</p>
<p>3D requirement of StreetFighter IV is more than mid-level, and the software can run nearly smoothly.</p>
<p> As far as built-in GPU standard is concerned, 3D performance is good. </p>
<p>To those who prefer small PC machine, they can consider buying Intel’s new structure if needing higher-performance 3D platform.</p>
<p>Temperature Test:</p>
<p>System standby: - 24/26</p>
<p><img src="http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/1673/bh55vdtemp1.png" alt="bh55vdtemp1.png" /></p>
<p>OCCT full loading: - 55/52</p>
<p><img src="http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/1061/bh55vdtemp2.png" alt="bh55vdtemp2.png" /></p>
<p>After all, the default clock of the dual-core CPU is near 3GHz, and the temperature is quite low with OEM thin Cooler. </p>
<p>And, the temperature is also acceptable even if CPU is full loading.</p>
<p>Power Consumption Test:</p>
<p>System standby: -39W</p>
<p><img src="http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/7163/bh55vdidle.jpg" alt="bh55vdidle.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/203874</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/203874</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:48:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Analytic cooler for the best buy of Intel Micro ATX with Core i3-530 on Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:38:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the past as far as built-in GPU platforms were concerned, Intel usually used “G Series” to name its products. </p>
<p>G45 or G41 as Intel’s main chipset were commonly seen in the market in the last generation. </p>
<p>At the beginning of 2010, Intel released new “All in one PC” structure, and firstly introduced the new technology that GPU was directly built in the CPU.</p>
<p>Moreover, Intel improved its CPU to 32nm process, and also released a series of CPUs that support the platform. </p>
<p>At present, there are 6 CPUs in the market: low-level Pentium G6950; mid-level Core i3 530/540; and high-level Core i5 650/660/661/670. </p>
<p>As to MB chipset, Intel released H55/H57 to support new CPU design, and the main difference was with and without RAID function.</p>
<p>Therefore, this time I am going to build a Micro ATX PC based upon Intel’s new structure.</p>
<p>As to CPU:</p>
<p>I choose Intel Core i3 530, with 73W and the latest 32nm process. </p>
<p>The code name is Clarkdale, with clock 2.93GHz, L2 2 x 256KB and L3 4MB. The price was about USD about 120. </p>
<p>The OEM coolers of Clarkdale series are all non-copper bottom design, so I infer that copper bottom is not definitely necessary for dual-core CPU with 32nm.</p>
<p><img src="http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/3440/bh55v01.jpg" alt="bh55v01.jpg" /></p>
<p>The main difference between Core i3 530 and Pentium G6950 is that the former supports HT technology; </p>
<p>higher-level Clarkdale i5 also supports TurboBoost auto-overclocking technology.</p>
<p><img src="http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/3875/bh55v02.jpg" alt="bh55v02.jpg" /></p>
<p>As to DRAM:</p>
<p>I choose American brand CORSAIR TWIN3X4G-1333C9A. </p>
<p>Its capacity is 2GB X 2, and the clock 1333 CL9 9-9-24 1.50V. The price is about USD about 75. </p>
<p><img src="http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/5629/bh55v03.jpg" alt="bh55v03.jpg" /></p>
<p>CORSAIR has unique DDR3 heat sink, and the appearance and quality are also good.</p>
<p><img src="http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/9717/bh55v04.jpg" alt="bh55v04.jpg" /></p>
<p>As to MB:</p>
<p>I use H55 chipset—BIOSTAR H55 HD, with higher C/P. </p>
<p>There are no whole solid capacitors, no USB3, and no sumptuous material on this mothboard, </p>
<p>but the price of the product is the lowest in H55 market, about USD 57.</p>
<p>BIOSTAR has another TH55B HD, with 4 DIMM DDR3 and high C/P, and the price is only USD 90.</p>
<p><img src="http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/9135/bh55v05.jpg" alt="bh55v05.jpg" /></p>
<p>Recently BIOSTAR seems to like using red as material colour, making products more impressive.</p>
<p><img src="http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/8133/bh55v06.jpg" alt="bh55v06.jpg" /></p>
<p>If this H55 MB can adopt Japanese electrolytic capacitors, I think this product can be more perfect.</p>
<p><img src="http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/9133/bh55v07.jpg" alt="bh55v07.jpg" /></p>
<p>As to Power Supply:</p>
<p>Judging from Intel’s latest 32nm platform, because of built-in GPU, I observe the power consumption of the whole system is low. </p>
<p>Antec’s latest Neo ECO 400W is chosen, so the power supply will be enough to add VGA card higher than mid-level. </p>
<p>The price is about USD about 55.</p>
<p><img src="http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/1781/bh55v08.jpg" alt="bh55v08.jpg" /></p>
<p>The power supply uses Japanese high-performance capacitors and quiet 12-centimetre fan with 2 Ball Bearing; this product is also 80 PLUS certified.</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/1118/bh55v09.jpg" alt="bh55v09.jpg" /></p>
<p>Test Platform:</p>
<p>CPU: Intel Core i3 530 ES</p>
<p>MB: BIOSTAR H55 HD</p>
<p>DRAM: CORSAIR TWIN3X4G-1333C9A</p>
<p>VGA: Intel Clarkdale 733MHz</p>
<p>HD: WD 6400AAKS 640GB</p>
<p>POWER: Antec Neo ECO 400W</p>
<p>Cooler: Intel OEM Cooler</p>
<p>OS: Windows7 Ultimate 64bit</p>
<p><img src="http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/30/bh55v10.jpg" alt="bh55v10.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/203873</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/203873</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:38:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>