<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Spero che troviate interessate questo 3ad.</p>
<p>Non è una gara, ma solo un confronto fra le prestazioni delle diverse mainboard... di certo non è esaustivo, ma è un inizio.</p>
<p>Comparativa divisa in 3 parti:</p>
<p>spi 32m 390x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X</p>
<p>spi 32m 402x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X</p>
<p>spi 32m 402x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X bootando con fsb 390x9 e salendo via win.</p>
<p>Sistema operativo Win Xp sp2 senza tweak o altro.</p>
<p>Comincio io... possesore di p5b dlx:</p>
<p><a href="http://img214.imageshack.us/my.php?image=spicontestsd7.jpg"><img src="http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/5327/spicontestsd7.th.jpg" alt="spicontestsd7.th.jpg" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://img523.imageshack.us/my.php?image=immagine402uf1.jpg"><img src="http://img523.imageshack.us/img523/5461/immagine402uf1.th.jpg" alt="immagine402uf1.th.jpg" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://img511.imageshack.us/my.php?image=argbv4.jpg"><img src="http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/1904/argbv4.th.jpg" alt="argbv4.th.jpg" /></a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/1370/comparativa-i965-e-i975-per-possessori-di-e6600-o-superiori</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:21:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/1370.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:33:59 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:56:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>gianni1879 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>LAVORA LAVORA <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/wink.png.981122a168c49b836247b5559b1cdcb0.png" alt=";)" /><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/grin.gif.3e001a1751d5ca14fbd0ba2a6c0e4286.gif" alt=";D" /><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" />
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/grin.gif.3e001a1751d5ca14fbd0ba2a6c0e4286.gif" alt=";D" />;D:haveaniceday:</p>
<p>Ciao;)</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47802</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47802</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dj883u2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:56:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:52:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>dj883u2 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Minchia tutte queste prove....<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/grin.gif.3e001a1751d5ca14fbd0ba2a6c0e4286.gif" alt=";D" />;D<p>Va be dai, domani posto il tutto.</p>
<p>Ciao;)</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>LAVORA LAVORA <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/wink.png.981122a168c49b836247b5559b1cdcb0.png" alt=";)" /><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/grin.gif.3e001a1751d5ca14fbd0ba2a6c0e4286.gif" alt=";D" /><img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47801</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47801</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gianni1879]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:52:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:36:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Kioji ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>thanks dj883u2... perÃ² il primo post diceva:
<p>spi 32m 390x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X</p>
<p>spi 32m 402x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X</p>
<p>spi 32m 402x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X bootando con fsb 390x9 e salendo via win.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Minchia tutte queste prove....<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/grin.gif.3e001a1751d5ca14fbd0ba2a6c0e4286.gif" alt=";D" />;D</p>
<p>Va be dai, domani posto il tutto.</p>
<p>Ciao;)</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47800</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47800</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dj883u2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:36:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:10:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>thanks dj883u2... perÃ² il primo post diceva:</p>
<p>spi 32m 390x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X</p>
<p>spi 32m 402x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X</p>
<p>spi 32m 402x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X bootando con fsb 390x9 e salendo via win.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47799</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47799</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kioji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:10:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:45:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family:&amp;quot">Fatto con Asus P5wdg2 Ws Professionala 402x9 con ram messe a 4-4-4-12 il tutto direttamente da bios.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:&amp;quot">Sistema Operativo con SP2 Ã¨ molto molto sporco.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://img176.imageshack.us/my.php?image=okvl1.jpg"><img src="http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/9859/okvl1.th.jpg" alt="okvl1.th.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Ciao;)</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47798</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47798</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dj883u2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:45:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:11:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>ok, allora vi aspetto <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /> !!!!</p>
<p>P.s. si sa che a paritÃ  di impostazioni il i975 Ã¨ migliore..... ma almeno cosÃ¬ otteniamo un metro per calcolarne la differenza <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/wink.png.981122a168c49b836247b5559b1cdcb0.png" alt=";)" />    ...quindi se non usate s.o. pompati Ã¨ meglio, perchÃ¨ l'unico scopo Ã¨ vedere la differenza fra i965 e i975... insomma non Ã¨ un contest <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47797</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47797</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kioji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:11:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:00:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Kioji ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>quindi ancora nessuno con i975 ed e6600?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>dammi ancora qualche giorno e poi ci sono anch'io!! <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/wink.png.981122a168c49b836247b5559b1cdcb0.png" alt=";)" /></p>
<p>Marco</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47796</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47796</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[principino1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:00:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:54:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>quindi ancora nessuno con i975 ed e6600?</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47795</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47795</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kioji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:54:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:52:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Kioji ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>forme di lagnusiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/59.gif.dc9f37bab5f547d29854356d2212d6df.gif" alt=":fiufiu:" />
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>ora ho solo la possibilitÃ  di provare il 6400 di andrea...appena mi ritorna il mio 6600 te le faccio subito tutte le prove!</p>
<p>Marco</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47794</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47794</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[principino1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:52:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:06:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>forme di lagnusiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/59.gif.dc9f37bab5f547d29854356d2212d6df.gif" alt=":fiufiu:" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47793</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47793</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kioji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:06:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:42:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Iscritto.<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
<p>Ciao;)</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47792</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47792</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[dj883u2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:42:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:12:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>guarda i tempi degli spi da 32mb.</p>
<p>Il primo anche se ha freq cpu e ram rispetto al secondo piÃ¹ basse, dÃ  un tempo migliore perchÃ¨ usa "latenze" del chipset piÃ¹ basse.</p>
<p>Il terzo spi invece Ã¨ migliore perchÃ¨ bootando a 390 di fsb, si impostano le stesse latenze chip del primo test, ma salendo di fsb via win fino a 402 mhz di fsb si ottengono le stesse freq del secondo test... ma con tempi notevolmente inferiori.</p>
<p>Semplice no?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amdclockers.it/forum/f13/principi_di_overclock_del_chipset_975x-1217/">http://www.amdclockers.it/forum/f13/principi_di_overclock_del_chipset_975x-1217/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47791</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47791</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kioji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:12:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Comparativa i965 e i975 per possessori di e6600 o superiori on Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:33:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Spero che troviate interessate questo 3ad.</p>
<p>Non è una gara, ma solo un confronto fra le prestazioni delle diverse mainboard... di certo non è esaustivo, ma è un inizio.</p>
<p>Comparativa divisa in 3 parti:</p>
<p>spi 32m 390x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X</p>
<p>spi 32m 402x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X</p>
<p>spi 32m 402x9 ram 1:1 cl 4-4-4-X bootando con fsb 390x9 e salendo via win.</p>
<p>Sistema operativo Win Xp sp2 senza tweak o altro.</p>
<p>Comincio io... possesore di p5b dlx:</p>
<p><a href="http://img214.imageshack.us/my.php?image=spicontestsd7.jpg"><img src="http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/5327/spicontestsd7.th.jpg" alt="spicontestsd7.th.jpg" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://img523.imageshack.us/my.php?image=immagine402uf1.jpg"><img src="http://img523.imageshack.us/img523/5461/immagine402uf1.th.jpg" alt="immagine402uf1.th.jpg" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://img511.imageshack.us/my.php?image=argbv4.jpg"><img src="http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/1904/argbv4.th.jpg" alt="argbv4.th.jpg" /></a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47790</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/47790</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kioji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:33:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>