<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the past six months, we often saw a lot of news about Intel 32nm CPU on the internet; </p>
<p>more information was about Core i7-980X, also LGA 1366 6 physical cores + 6 virtual HT cores (12 Threading).</p>
<p>The orientation of 32nm CPU belongs to Intel future highest-level LGA 1366 platform, </p>
<p>which most consumers show less interest in because of higher price.</p>
<p>Now take a look at Intel LGA 1156 platform. </p>
<p>About this new product line, there will be some 32nm CPU products put on sale,</p>
<p> including Core i5 6XX and Core i3 5XX series, and named Clarkdale.</p>
<p>The market orientation of these two series is different from previous Intel CPU. </p>
<p>The main reason is that Intel defines new CPU structure, not putting GPU into chipset like before but into CPU directly. </p>
<p>Intel’s such new design will affect PC market style “All in One MB” is becoming the future.</p>
<p>On chipset side, Intel releases H55/H57 to support new CPU design, and main difference is with or without RAID function. </p>
<p>Same as P55 chipset, a single-chip is adopted in the new chipset;</p>
<p> I assume Micro-ATX form factor will be the main design for H55/H57 motherboards. </p>
<p>Of course, some manufacturers also released ATX form factor for higher-level H57, seeming to direct compete with AMD 785G/790GX. </p>
<p>Especially, Micro-ATX products of AMD hold a special attraction for consumers for a quiet sometime now. </p>
<p>Therefore, Intel wants to increase his market share counting on this new product line this time.</p>
<p><img src="http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/5206/bh5501s.jpg" alt="bh5501s.jpg" /></p>
<p>This time I used BIOSTAR T-Series TH55XE as my MB platform, </p>
<p>which using Intel H55 chipset without RAID function, and its street price is around US$115 (about NT$3750). </p>
<p>Firstly, we can see the black is the main colour for the package. </p>
<p>I think the matching colour is exactly moderate, and package design is very special.</p>
<p><img src="http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/2122/bh5502.jpg" alt="bh5502.jpg" /></p>
<p>Product manual, driver CD, related cables and IO panel are attached.</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/2319/bh5503.jpg" alt="bh5503.jpg" /></p>
<p>BIOSTAR TSERIES TH55XE itself</p>
<p><img src="http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/7153/bh5504.jpg" alt="bh5504.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/4517/bh5505.jpg" alt="bh5505.jpg" /></p>
<p>Intel latest LGA 1156 32nm CPU front/reverse side</p>
<p>The CPU in the picture is Core i5 661, 2 physical cores + 2 virtual HT cores (4 Threading).</p>
<p>CPU clock: 133 X 25 = 3.33GHz; built-in GPU clock = 900MHz</p>
<p><img src="http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/5333/bh5506.jpg" alt="bh5506.jpg" /></p>
<p>Lower-left of the motherboard</p>
<p>1 X PCI-E X16</p>
<p>1 X PCI-E X4</p>
<p>2 X PCI</p>
<p>LAN chipset: Realtek 8111DL</p>
<p>Audio chipset: Realtek ALC888?7.1 channels and supports HD Audio</p>
<p><img src="http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/4179/bh5507.jpg" alt="bh5507.jpg" /></p>
<p>Lower-right of the motherboard</p>
<p>5 x yellow SATAII?H55 provides SATA2 specification</p>
<p>Power?Reset buttons?debug indicators</p>
<p><img src="http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/4941/bh5508.jpg" alt="bh5508.jpg" /></p>
<p>Upper-right of the motherboard</p>
<p>4 x DIMM DDR3, supports 800/1066/1333/1600(OC)/2000(OC), maximum capacity of DDR3 is 16GB?</p>
<p>1 X IDE, by JMB368</p>
<p>With 24-PIN power connector</p>
<p><img src="http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/6852/bh5509.jpg" alt="bh5509.jpg" /></p>
<p>Upper-left of the motherboard</p>
<p>LGA 1156 location, adopting CPU 4+ VTT 2+GPU 1 phases power supply</p>
<p>BIOSTAR adopts IR DirectFET phase design for power supply, </p>
<p>with higher cost and better quality than common material.</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/5232/bh5510.jpg" alt="bh5510.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/13161/intel-s-latest-32nm-clarkdale-platform-core-i5-661-with-biostar-h55-oc-5g-on-air</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:17:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/13161.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:25:56 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:53:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Timon85 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Bel risultato cmq... Queste cpu viaggiano davvero forte <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/wink.png.981122a168c49b836247b5559b1cdcb0.png" alt=";)" />
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Stasera tocca a te caro <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" />:asd:</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189326</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189326</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[swattolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:53:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:43:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Bel risultato cmq... Queste cpu viaggiano davvero forte <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/wink.png.981122a168c49b836247b5559b1cdcb0.png" alt=";)" /></p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189325</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189325</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Timon85]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:43:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:02:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Le085 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>più il processo produttivo è alto e piu' sopporta tensioni alte <p>per un p4 1,5875 non è tanto <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Grazie Leo <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189324</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189324</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[swattolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:02:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:52:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>più il processo produttivo è alto e piu' sopporta tensioni alte </p>
<p>per un p4 1,5875 non è tanto <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189323</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189323</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Le085]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:52:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:44:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>io sinceramente con sta storia del V-core non c'ho capito un tubo, io ho un 90nm e ho la cpu @ 1.5875V da Bios, defaut 1.4V e vorrei che un paio di anni li facesse, non é che rischio tenendola così ?</p>]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189322</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189322</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[swattolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:44:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:34:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>swattolo ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Pensavo che arrivandoci con un Vcore troppo alto allora poteva creare seri problemi col tempo, se crasha Windows dettagli <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" />
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>col tempo si ...ma essendo appunto un suicide screen non credo che stai molto tempo in quelle condizioni...è già tanto che apre cpu-z...<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/59.gif.dc9f37bab5f547d29854356d2212d6df.gif" alt=":fiufiu:" /></p>
<p>in ogni coso è ovvio che non si puo' tenere per il daily una cpu 32nm a 1,5V... a meno che non pensi di cambiarla dopo 1 anno</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189321</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189321</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Le085]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:34:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:28:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Le085 ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>no si dice suicide screen semplicemente perchè crasha come niente in quelle circostanze <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" /><p>ma non è che muore la cpu...si suicida solo il sistema operativo <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Pensavo che arrivandoci con un Vcore troppo alto allora poteva creare seri problemi col tempo, se crasha Windows dettagli <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189320</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189320</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[swattolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:28:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:21:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>swattolo ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>5Ghz ad aria é un suicidio per il Daily per il Vcore troppo alto o per altri motivi ?<p>Fantastic Review <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/afro.gif.17de86fe34bff2b0b91da1f54c9b3376.gif" alt="O0" /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>no si dice suicide screen semplicemente perchè crasha come niente in quelle circostanze <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/asd.gif.50bd87e1bd2fb722ff72ad77f76e268c.gif" alt=":asd:" /></p>
<p>ma non è che muore la cpu...si suicida solo il sistema operativo <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189319</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189319</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Le085]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:21:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:18:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>5Ghz ad aria é un suicidio per il Daily per il Vcore troppo alto o per altri motivi ?</p>
<p>Fantastic Review <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/afro.gif.17de86fe34bff2b0b91da1f54c9b3376.gif" alt="O0" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189318</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189318</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[swattolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:18:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:10:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>windwithme ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>Finally, add CPU voltage, challenge high clock “5GHz” by air cooling<p><img src="http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/4614/bh55o5g.png" alt="bh55o5g.png" /></p>
<p>CPUZ certification</p>
<p><a href="http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=925687">Intel Core i5 661 OC 5G / windwithme</a></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>That's impressive, man! :AAAAH:</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189317</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189317</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[One1ros]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:10:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:42:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p><strong>Achille GForce ha scritto:</strong></p>
<div>5Ghz ad aria con un Westemere ? Questa sì che è una cpu vera dual core.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>beh è un suicide screen, non è certo da tenere per il daily <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
<p>Thanks for the very good review Windwithme :n2mu:</p>
<p>And very nice OC capabilities of Clarkdale. Moreover, H55 chipset too, seems to be not bad <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189316</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189316</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Le085]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:42:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:36:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Finally, add CPU voltage, challenge high clock “5GHz” by air cooling</p>
<p><img src="http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/4614/bh55o5g.png" alt="bh55o5g.png" /></p>
<p>CPUZ certification</p>
<p><a href="http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=925687">Intel Core i5 661 OC 5G / windwithme</a></p>
<p>About 1.476~1.488V, this range can provide enough voltage for 5GHz into OS. </p>
<p>If you want to use Super PI and same level software, I think adding voltage up to 1.52 ~ 1.56V for CPU is necessary. </p>
<p>E8400~E8600 also can make CPU run at 4.8~4.9GHz, but voltage and temperature of 32nm are lower. </p>
<p>In the future, if Intel makes 32nm better, overclocking dual-core CPU to 5GHz will not be just a dream.</p>
<p>BIOSTAR T-Series TH55XE</p>
<p>Merits:</p>
<p>1. The design of package makes the product look high quality.</p>
<p>2. The range of BIOS voltage setting is wide; external clock and other options are also plentiful.</p>
<p>3. Power consumption of H55 chipset is very low.</p>
<p>4. Overclocking can make CPU/DDR3 reach 200/2000 steady level.</p>
<p>5. CPU power supply material is applied by better phase design.</p>
<p>Demerits:</p>
<p>1. The price of all H55 MB is still too high now.</p>
<p>2. Due to Intel’s structural design, i5 CPU built-in GPU can not show good performance on DDR3.</p>
<p><img src="http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/9339/bh5519.jpg" alt="bh5519.jpg" /></p>
<p>Performance:??????????</p>
<p>Material:	??????????</p>
<p>Specification:??????????</p>
<p>Appearance:??????????</p>
<p>Price:??????????</p>
<p>Price of most H55 MB is about NT$4200 (about US$130). </p>
<p>Although the price of BIOSTAR T-Series TH55XE is about US$117, it is a cheaper choice. </p>
<p>But I think the price of H55 chipset is still too high; if its price can be reduced to US$100, the product must be more popular.</p>
<p>About Clarkdale CPU, there will be both Core i5 6XX and Core i3 5XX series,</p>
<p>and the main difference is supporting TurboBoost or not.</p>
<p>I find some quotations about this kind of CPU from other websites:</p>
<p>Core i5 6XX: US$176~284</p>
<p>Core i3 530/540: US$113/133 respectively; and the price of Intel Pentium G9650 without HT technology is US$87.</p>
<p>My personal thinking of “All in One MB” platform, at the initial stage the price of the CPU product that consumers can accept is about US$90 ~ 110.</p>
<p>Therefore, Core i3 530 and Pentium G9650 are the products that can fit in with most consumers’ budget.</p>
<p>My experience about testing Clarkdale platform this time</p>
<p>Supported by 32nm new technology, the CPU, </p>
<p>compared with 45nm, has higher clock, lower temperature and power consumption, all of which make a great impression on me. </p>
<p>But now owing too high price, Intel still leaves something to be desired to make its products accepted by more consumers. </p>
<p>I feel very happy that besides AMD platform, Intel also releases higher performance All in One chipset. </p>
<p>Although current Clarkdale C/P value is not high, anyway Intel finally makes great progress on this product field in 2010. </p>
<p>I also expect the parity of this new platform is coming soon.</p>
<p>The release of Clarkdale provides one more choice in the market, </p>
<p>and makes the performance of Intel All in One chipset greater in the future.</p>
<p>By the way, I'm also enjoyed the world of DSLR; </p>
<p>I actually already had 4 of them since last year, including my latest one - a CANON KISS X3 Kit (500D).  </p>
<p><img src="http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/2413/bh5520.jpg" alt="bh5520.jpg" /></p>
<p>In the coming February, I'm going to share my experience of the CANON KISS X3 </p>
<p>And again, I truly appreciated for all your support, feedbacks, or even one simple comment; </p>
<p>that gives me the power and encourages to continue my sharing. Thank you <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189315</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189315</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:36:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:33:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Nuclearus Multi Core =&gt; 17945</p>
<p>Fritz Chess Benchmark =&gt; 17.69/8489</p>
<p><img src="http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/1092/bh55onm.png" alt="bh55onm.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalMark 2004R3 =&gt; 219569</p>
<p><img src="http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/3905/bh55ocm.png" alt="bh55ocm.png" /></p>
<p>CINEBENCH R10</p>
<p>1 CPU=&gt; 6371</p>
<p>x CPU=&gt; 14569</p>
<p><img src="http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/103/bh55ocb.png" alt="bh55ocb.png" /></p>
<p>PCMark Vantage =&gt; 15076</p>
<p><img src="http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/9426/bh55opcvan.png" alt="bh55opcvan.png" /></p>
<p>When Core i5 661 is overclocked to 4.6GHz, 1.3V voltage can make the system steady. </p>
<p>32nm design makes dual-core CPU total clock raised 300 ~ 500MHz further.</p>
<p>H55 does not provide RAID function, so I used a SDD to test transfer rate.</p>
<p>CORSAIR CMFSSD-64GB2D, specification is 220/120 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/8599/bh55dhdd.png" alt="bh55dhdd.png" /></p>
<p>From the test of SDD with high transfer rate, I find read/write performance of H55 is less 5 ~ 10MB/s than ICH10R. </p>
<p>I think the possible reason is deviation value, or the performance of single chipset could be lower. </p>
<p>As result, H55 shows fine performance on HDD.</p>
<p>GPU OC 1167MHz 128mb</p>
<p>3DVANTAGE =&gt; 563</p>
<p><img src="http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/7905/bh55d3dvano.png" alt="bh55d3dvano.png" /></p>
<p>StreetFighter IV Benchmark</p>
<p>1024 X 768 =&gt; 7455</p>
<p><img src="http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/6453/bh55dsf4o.png" alt="bh55dsf4o.png" /></p>
<p>Users can overclock built-in GPU by BIOS options. </p>
<p>The GPU performance can be raised 15 ~ 20% after overclocked.</p>
<p>DRAM performance test</p>
<p>CPU 133 X 25 =&gt; 3333MHz</p>
<p>DRAM DDR3 1333 CL9 9-9-24 1T</p>
<p>Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 11709 MB/s</p>
<p>EVEREST Memory Read - 9259 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/6941/bh55d1333mem.png" alt="bh55d1333mem.png" /></p>
<p>CPU 200 X 23 =&gt; 4600MHz</p>
<p>DRAM DDR3 2000 CL8 8-8-24 1T</p>
<p>Sandra Memory Bandwidth - 17848 MB/s</p>
<p>EVEREST Memory Read - 13613 MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/6199/bh55d2000mem.png" alt="bh55d2000mem.png" /></p>
<p>About DDR3 2000, BIOS setting is CL8, but CPUZ shows CL9, EVEREST CL10.</p>
<p>I’m not sure why they are different; probably something related to BIOS setting. </p>
<p>Concerning DDR3 bandwidth performance, I thought Clarkdale can show great result like P55 dual-channel/ X58 tri-channel. </p>
<p>The design that Intel makes Memory Controller built-in can make the bandwidth of these new platforms 150~250% faster than LGA 775.</p>
<p>It's pity not able to take advantage on its high bandwidth infrastructure due to GPU engine integrated inside Clarkdule Core i5 processor.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189314</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189314</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:33:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:29:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>CrystalMark 2004R3 =&gt; 155768</p>
<p><img src="http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/5255/bh55dcm.png" alt="bh55dcm.png" /></p>
<p>CINEBENCH R10</p>
<p>1 CPU=&gt; 4832</p>
<p>x CPU=&gt; 10794</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/4092/bh55dcb.png" alt="bh55dcb.png" /></p>
<p>PCMark Vantage =&gt; 10706</p>
<p><img src="http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/3326/bh55dpcvan.png" alt="bh55dpcvan.png" /></p>
<p>CPU voltage is only 0.948V when system is standby; the voltage rises to 1.128V when CPU is in full loading. </p>
<p>Moreover about TurboBoost, when the system is standby, only single core is used, and CPU clock also rises to 3.6GHz. </p>
<p>When dual cores are in process, CPU clock will change to 3.46GHz. </p>
<p>In other words, under the condition of single core, CPU multiplier can be plus X2; of dual cores, plus X1.</p>
<p>The default CPU clock of Core i5 661 is very high, and the performance of the CPU is also great, </p>
<p>suitable for non-conversion or drawing software. </p>
<p>For most software that do not support multitasking, CPU clock at this moment is more important.</p>
<p>3DVANTAGE =&gt; 486</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/8296/bh55d3dvan.png" alt="bh55d3dvan.png" /></p>
<p>StreetFighter IV Benchmark</p>
<p>1024 X 768 =&gt; 7011</p>
<p><img src="http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/8054/bh55dsf4.png" alt="bh55dsf4.png" /></p>
<p>Clarkdale shows similar performance in 3DMARK2006 and 3D like 785G.</p>
<p>However, H55, without overclocking, gets higher scores in 3DVANTAGE than 785G. StreetFighter IV also shows high performance; </p>
<p>of course, built-in GPU products are what we use to compare. </p>
<p>The result also means Intel has made great progress in GPU design.</p>
<p>PSU is quiet in latest series E7 Cable Management, watt is 480W</p>
<p><img src="http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/307/bh5517.jpg" alt="bh5517.jpg" /></p>
<p>Module design makes it easier to place cables in order.</p>
<p><img src="http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/1466/bh5518.jpg" alt="bh5518.jpg" /></p>
<p>When H55 platform is used as word-processing, 350W PSU is enough to support the system. </p>
<p>But if running at higher-performance VGA or hard drives will be added in the future, 400W ~ 500W PSU are recommended.</p>
<p>Test of power consumption</p>
<p>Standby: - 34~39W</p>
<p>When CPUZ displays 3600MHz, this condition means single core is being used.</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/4923/bh55dwidle.jpg" alt="bh55dwidle.jpg" /></p>
<p>Full speed: - 79~89W</p>
<p>When CPUZ displays 3466MHz, this condition means 2 physical core + 2 virtual HT cores are being used.</p>
<p><img src="http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/8839/bh55dwfull.jpg" alt="bh55dwfull.jpg" /></p>
<p>The combination of Intel Core i5 661 and H55MB saves more power; </p>
<p>when the system is in standby mode, the lowest power consumption is only 34W. </p>
<p>And, the range of power consumption is 79 ~ 89W when CPU is at the full speed 3.46GHz; </p>
<p>hence, 32nm platform can save more power than ever. </p>
<p>But I also find that different PSUs bring dissimilar results: when the system is standby, </p>
<p>the power consumption is mostly 38 ~ 42W for common 400W PSUs; and, 34 ~ 36W for 480W PSU (80 PLUS also help save energy).</p>
<p>OC performance</p>
<p>CPU 200 X 23 =&gt; 4600MHz</p>
<p>DRAM DDR3 2000 CL8 8-8-24 1T</p>
<p>GPU 900MHz 128mb</p>
<p>Hyper 4 X PI 32M=&gt; 12m 49.813s</p>
<p>CPUMARK 99=&gt; 709</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/2459/bh55opi.png" alt="bh55opi.png" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189313</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189313</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:29:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:28:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>BIOSTAR’s G.P.U Phase Control</p>
<p>CPU Load Line option is also put in this page.</p>
<p><img src="http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/4638/bh55b06.jpg" alt="bh55b06.jpg" /></p>
<p>Built-in GPU option, named IGD Graphics</p>
<p>32/64/128MB can be selected to share RAM.</p>
<p><img src="http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/4546/bh55b07.jpg" alt="bh55b07.jpg" /></p>
<p>Main page of CPU technology options</p>
<p>Common C1E, HT, VT, etc technology all can be set enabled or disabled from here.</p>
<p><img src="http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/5373/bh55b08.jpg" alt="bh55b08.jpg" /></p>
<p>When built-in GPU is used, all of these options will appear</p>
<p>They can be overclocked with built-in GPU, with range from 133 ~ 2000MHz</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/309/bh55b09.jpg" alt="bh55b09.jpg" /></p>
<p>For BIOS setting, I set steady configuration according to the ratio of CPU to DDR3 is 200 to 2000. </p>
<p>When external CPU clock is set over 166 ~ 175MHz, built-in GPU becomes unsteady. </p>
<p>So, if you want to overclock CPU over 200MHz, external VGA is suggested. </p>
<p>I find this special situation when I use Clarkdale; </p>
<p>one possible reason is that GPU is built in CPU, so the design affects overclocking capability indirectly.</p>
<p>Testing platform:</p>
<p>CPU: Intel Core i5-661 ES</p>
<p>MB: BIOSTAR TSERIES TH55XE</p>
<p>DRAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GT CMG6GX3M3A2000C8</p>
<p>VGA: Intel Clarkdale 900MHz</p>
<p>HD: CORSAIR CMFSSD-64GB2D</p>
<p>POWER: be quiet E7 Cable Management 480W</p>
<p>Cooler: Mega Shadow(Deluxe Edition)</p>
<p>OS: Windows7 Ultimate 64bit</p>
<p><img src="http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/6020/bh5516.jpg" alt="bh5516.jpg" /></p>
<p>BIOSTAR’s exclusive software</p>
<p>TOverclocker, multifunctional OS software, </p>
<p>allows user adjust external clock, voltage, and performance modes from this programme directly.</p>
<p><img src="http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/1425/bh55dos1.png" alt="bh55dos1.png" /></p>
<p>Hardware Monitor</p>
<p><img src="http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/2839/bh55dos2.png" alt="bh55dos2.png" /></p>
<p>The upper software allows user to change boot logo directly; FOXCONN also had similar software before.</p>
<p>G.P.U Energy-saving software: it is suggested to disable this utility when overclocking to remain system steady.</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/9743/bh55dos3.png" alt="bh55dos3.png" /></p>
<p>BIOSTAR now provides more and more software and professional functions as a big manufacturer should have. </p>
<p>From software user aspects, I believe Biostar team should improve and make it more user friendly.</p>
<p>Below is the test result of Intel new 32nm platform.</p>
<p>CPU uses Intel Core i5-661, 4 Threading, clock is 3.33GHz, L3 Cache 4MB</p>
<p>GPU is 900Mhz, 87W, official price is US$196</p>
<p>Default performance:</p>
<p>CPU 133 X 25 =&gt; 3333MHz</p>
<p>DRAM DDR3 1333 CL9 9-9-24 1T</p>
<p>GPU 900MHz 128mb</p>
<p>Hyper 4 X PI 32M=&gt; 18m 00.891s</p>
<p>CPUMARK 99=&gt; 550</p>
<p><img src="http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/2655/bh55dpi.png" alt="bh55dpi.png" /></p>
<p>Nuclearus Multi Core =&gt; 13523</p>
<p>Fritz Chess Benchmark =&gt; 13.07/6273</p>
<p><img src="http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/7213/bh55dnm.png" alt="bh55dnm.png" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189312</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189312</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:28:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:27:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>IO</p>
<p>1 X D-SUB</p>
<p>1 X DVI-D</p>
<p>1 X HDMI</p>
<p>4 X USB 2.0</p>
<p>1 X RJ-45</p>
<p>1 X eSATA/USB 2.0</p>
<p>1 X S/PDIF Out</p>
<p>1 X IEEE 1394</p>
<p><img src="http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/9461/bh5511.jpg" alt="bh5511.jpg" /></p>
<p>Under heatsink of TSERIES is H55</p>
<p><img src="http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/8479/bh5512.jpg" alt="bh5512.jpg" /></p>
<p>Mosfet uses a smaller heatsink</p>
<p><img src="http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/3246/bh5513.jpg" alt="bh5513.jpg" /></p>
<p>LAN chipset Realtek 8111DL</p>
<p><img src="http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/5056/bh5514.jpg" alt="bh5514.jpg" /></p>
<p>Audio chipset Realtek ALC888, surrounded by Japanese solid capacitors</p>
<p><img src="http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/2472/bh5515.jpg" alt="bh5515.jpg" /></p>
<p>Boot logo</p>
<p><img src="http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/3649/bh55b01.jpg" alt="bh55b01.jpg" /></p>
<p>Main page of adjusting frequency, voltage</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/6835/bh55b02.jpg" alt="bh55b02.jpg" /></p>
<p>Page of voltage</p>
<p>CPU Vocre -0.080~+1.260V</p>
<p>CPU VTT Voltage 1.150~2.080V</p>
<p>CPU PLL Voltage 1.800~2.730V</p>
<p>DRAM Voltage 1.300~2.545V</p>
<p>PCH PLL Voltage 1.100~2.030V</p>
<p>PCH Voltage 1.10~1.25V</p>
<p>IGD Voltage 1.18~1.78V</p>
<p><img src="http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/3425/bh55b03.jpg" alt="bh55b03.jpg" /></p>
<p>Intel PPM Configuration, many C-STATE can be selected from here</p>
<p><img src="http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/2441/bh55b04.jpg" alt="bh55b04.jpg" /></p>
<p>DDR3 Timing Configuration</p>
<p>Users can adjust arguments according to their DRAM quality.</p>
<p><img src="http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/4736/bh55b05.jpg" alt="bh55b05.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189311</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189311</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:27:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Intel’s Latest 32nm Clarkdale Platform - Core i5 661 With BIOSTAR H55 OC 5G On Air on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:25:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the past six months, we often saw a lot of news about Intel 32nm CPU on the internet; </p>
<p>more information was about Core i7-980X, also LGA 1366 6 physical cores + 6 virtual HT cores (12 Threading).</p>
<p>The orientation of 32nm CPU belongs to Intel future highest-level LGA 1366 platform, </p>
<p>which most consumers show less interest in because of higher price.</p>
<p>Now take a look at Intel LGA 1156 platform. </p>
<p>About this new product line, there will be some 32nm CPU products put on sale,</p>
<p> including Core i5 6XX and Core i3 5XX series, and named Clarkdale.</p>
<p>The market orientation of these two series is different from previous Intel CPU. </p>
<p>The main reason is that Intel defines new CPU structure, not putting GPU into chipset like before but into CPU directly. </p>
<p>Intel’s such new design will affect PC market style “All in One MB” is becoming the future.</p>
<p>On chipset side, Intel releases H55/H57 to support new CPU design, and main difference is with or without RAID function. </p>
<p>Same as P55 chipset, a single-chip is adopted in the new chipset;</p>
<p> I assume Micro-ATX form factor will be the main design for H55/H57 motherboards. </p>
<p>Of course, some manufacturers also released ATX form factor for higher-level H57, seeming to direct compete with AMD 785G/790GX. </p>
<p>Especially, Micro-ATX products of AMD hold a special attraction for consumers for a quiet sometime now. </p>
<p>Therefore, Intel wants to increase his market share counting on this new product line this time.</p>
<p><img src="http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/5206/bh5501s.jpg" alt="bh5501s.jpg" /></p>
<p>This time I used BIOSTAR T-Series TH55XE as my MB platform, </p>
<p>which using Intel H55 chipset without RAID function, and its street price is around US$115 (about NT$3750). </p>
<p>Firstly, we can see the black is the main colour for the package. </p>
<p>I think the matching colour is exactly moderate, and package design is very special.</p>
<p><img src="http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/2122/bh5502.jpg" alt="bh5502.jpg" /></p>
<p>Product manual, driver CD, related cables and IO panel are attached.</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/2319/bh5503.jpg" alt="bh5503.jpg" /></p>
<p>BIOSTAR TSERIES TH55XE itself</p>
<p><img src="http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/7153/bh5504.jpg" alt="bh5504.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/4517/bh5505.jpg" alt="bh5505.jpg" /></p>
<p>Intel latest LGA 1156 32nm CPU front/reverse side</p>
<p>The CPU in the picture is Core i5 661, 2 physical cores + 2 virtual HT cores (4 Threading).</p>
<p>CPU clock: 133 X 25 = 3.33GHz; built-in GPU clock = 900MHz</p>
<p><img src="http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/5333/bh5506.jpg" alt="bh5506.jpg" /></p>
<p>Lower-left of the motherboard</p>
<p>1 X PCI-E X16</p>
<p>1 X PCI-E X4</p>
<p>2 X PCI</p>
<p>LAN chipset: Realtek 8111DL</p>
<p>Audio chipset: Realtek ALC888?7.1 channels and supports HD Audio</p>
<p><img src="http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/4179/bh5507.jpg" alt="bh5507.jpg" /></p>
<p>Lower-right of the motherboard</p>
<p>5 x yellow SATAII?H55 provides SATA2 specification</p>
<p>Power?Reset buttons?debug indicators</p>
<p><img src="http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/4941/bh5508.jpg" alt="bh5508.jpg" /></p>
<p>Upper-right of the motherboard</p>
<p>4 x DIMM DDR3, supports 800/1066/1333/1600(OC)/2000(OC), maximum capacity of DDR3 is 16GB?</p>
<p>1 X IDE, by JMB368</p>
<p>With 24-PIN power connector</p>
<p><img src="http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/6852/bh5509.jpg" alt="bh5509.jpg" /></p>
<p>Upper-left of the motherboard</p>
<p>LGA 1156 location, adopting CPU 4+ VTT 2+GPU 1 phases power supply</p>
<p>BIOSTAR adopts IR DirectFET phase design for power supply, </p>
<p>with higher cost and better quality than common material.</p>
<p><img src="http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/5232/bh5510.jpg" alt="bh5510.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189310</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/189310</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:25:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>