<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Hands on with a thin and stylish 14&quot; CULV Notebook – the MSI X-Slim X400]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>This year Intel released a new 45nm single-core, ultra low voltage CPU referred to as the CULV. </p>
<p>By comparison, the earlier Atom 512K's low CPU performance limited it to basic word processing tasks. </p>
<p>Intel had also insisted that the Atom processor only be used on NetBook products under 11.6". </p>
<p>Ordinary notebooks are usually between 12~13.3".</p>
<p>Compact models that weigh 1.3~1.7kg or less are often very expensive. </p>
<p>The introduction of the new CULV architecture has brought about a significant price drop in the notebook market. </p>
<p>The CULV has also put a lot of pressure on high-end compact notebooks for business users. </p>
<p>Although the new CULV CPU lacks the performance of a dual core CPU in a high-end business notebook </p>
<p>it has turned the tables on the conventional notebook market view that a lighter weight means a higher price. </p>
<p>Right now, CULV notebooks cost between US$700 ~ 900, or about half the price of a business notebook. </p>
<p>They are a lot lighter than US$1500 ~ 2000 business notebooks or even the average US$700 ~ 900 for a dual-core notebook.</p>
<p>The X-Slim series launched by MSI this year is based on CULV architecture. </p>
<p>The X-Slim is available in three models: X340 (13.3"), X400 (14.1") and X600 (15.6"). </p>
<p>MSI has kept the price under US$900 for all three models and the version with the CM 723 CPU can be had for less than US$700. </p>
<p>In this hands-on review, we take a look at the MSI X-Slim X400. </p>
<p>What really makes this model stand out is its official weight of 1.5kg. </p>
<p>This is a lot lighter than your standard dual-core 14" Notebook weighing around 2.2 ~ 2.6kg. </p>
<p>It's also lighter than 14" CULV notebooks of other brands that weigh in at around 1.9kg. </p>
<p>When it comes to weight loss, the MSI X-Slim series really does it better than any other.</p>
<p>X400's product box</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/4784/mx40001.jpg" alt="mx40001.jpg" /></p>
<p>Included accessories</p>
<p>Windows Vista Home Premium, product warranty, driver CD and user manuals</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/8094/mx40002.jpg" alt="mx40002.jpg" /></p>
<p>The MSI X-Slim X400 itself</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/3159/mx40003.jpg" alt="mx40003.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/1231/mx40004.jpg" alt="mx40004.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/6729/mx40005.jpg" alt="mx40005.jpg" /></p>
<p>The carry bag bundled with the X400 has a leather-like texture on the outside and the MSI logo is inside. </p>
<p>It feels really nice and is quite thin so it doesn't take up space.</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/4572/mx40006.jpg" alt="mx40006.jpg" /></p>
<p>The transformer is the usual small form-factor version. </p>
<p>This is good, because it's easier to carry around. </p>
<p>However, it is my experience, with some other brands of Netbooks, that small transformers tend to heat up a bit in use. </p>
<p>In a trial of the MSI X-Slim charger, I found it did not heat up too much but took longer to give a full charge. </p>
<p>DELTA is a well-established brand so you can count on the quality.</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/7615/mx40007.jpg" alt="mx40007.jpg" /></p>
<p>The included mouse is the compact type with internal cabling and is the same pearl white color as the machine.</p>
<p><img src="http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/6097/mx40008.jpg" alt="mx40008.jpg" /></p>
<p>The 4-cell battery is rated at 2150mAh 32Wh</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/8109/mx40009.jpg" alt="mx40009.jpg" /></p>
<p>Opening the cover shows the inside is fully protected. </p>
<p>The screen and keyboard are all covered in transparent plastic film. </p>
<p>There is also a protective cotton pad in the middle with the MSI logo. </p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/7518/mx40010.jpg" alt="mx40010.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/11968/hands-on-with-a-thin-and-stylish-14-culv-notebook-the-msi-x-slim-x400</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 20:55:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/11968.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:01:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hands on with a thin and stylish 14&quot; CULV Notebook – the MSI X-Slim X400 on Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:49:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Integrated graphics cards usually don't offer high 3D performance.</p>
<p>As the StreetFighter IV Benchmark shows, it's not up to the heavy 3D loads of the newer games. </p>
<p>For 3D games that don't require a lot of power however like Chinese Paladin Online however, the X400 is quite good enough.</p>
<p>Battery endurance</p>
<p>The 4-cell battery lasted 01:39:10. </p>
<p>Battery Eater Pro (Wireless networking and Bluetooth switched off, 50% LCD brightness.)</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/6453/mx400w7bep.png" alt="mx400w7bep.png" /></p>
<p>During the Battery Eater Pro test the CPU was under full load with 3D graphics turned up so the battery life was a little shorter. </p>
<p>If set to cinema mode, the X400 runs for around 2 hours and 35 minutes, so battery life is above average. </p>
<p>While MSI claims that the X400 offers up to 8 hours of battery life, that's with an 8-cell battery. </p>
<p>Many of the Notebook makers now claim battery life as long as 8~9 hours, but that's probably based on the lowest power consumption possible. </p>
<p>Under normal use, 6/8-cell batteries deliver around 5~7 hours of run-time. </p>
<p>So, don't take the numbers too seriously.</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/731/mx40021.jpg" alt="mx40021.jpg" /></p>
<p>MSI X-Slim X400 Summary.</p>
<p>Strengths</p>
<p>1. With a 14.1" LCD and weighing just 1.55kg, this should be the lightest notebook in its size class now available.</p>
<p>2. The matt finish on the underside, the cut-out design inside and thin form-factor gives a good overall impression. </p>
<p>3. A lot of thought went into the protective packaging. The carry bag is of good quality as well.</p>
<p>4. D-SUB and HDMI outputs are both supported so the IO can be upgraded.</p>
<p>5. The DDR2 RAM runs at 800MHz for high performance while the WD 5400RPM 320GB 2.5 HDD delivers both performance and little noise. </p>
<p>6. The wireless card is the Intel WiFI Link 5100 with support for 802.11 a/g/n. It can also be upgraded to support WinMax. </p>
<p>7. Has a better cooling system than the X340. </p>
<p>There's no obvious noise and the machine temperature is kept under firm control.</p>
<p>Weaknesses</p>
<p>1. Keyboard could do with more feedback. </p>
<p>2. Only 2 USB ports leaves less room for USB devices.</p>
<p>3. The 4-cell battery should offer more than 3 hours of stand-by time.</p>
<p>4. The screen bezel is a little large.</p>
<p>Performance ??????????</p>
<p>Construction ??????????</p>
<p>Specifications ??????????</p>
<p>Appearance ??????????</p>
<p>Cost vs. Performance ??????????</p>
<p>Recently I've seen other users say that the single core of the CULV means low CPU performance </p>
<p>and this drags down the overall system performance as well. </p>
<p>I have experience with high-end notebook CPUs like the P8700, T9500, T9600, P9700 or QX9300 (quad-core) </p>
<p>but since I don't run video or file encoding software that support multi-core setups I find the X400 suits me well. </p>
<p>As long as the system boots up smoothly, the actual CPU performance or number of cores have little effect when browsing the web, </p>
<p>doing word processing, or running JAVA and SQL applications. </p>
<p>Personally, I think a high-performance HDD or SSD is more important </p>
<p>if you want a clear speed boost when running this type of software. </p>
<p>I feel that notebooks are designed to be practical and unlike desktop PCs, raw performance is not the only benchmark. Right now, </p>
<p>the notebooks on the market can be divided into the following groups: </p>
<p>Value models: 12"~16", 1.8~3.3kg, dual-core, discrete graphics card, priced around US$700 ~ 1000. </p>
<p>High-end business models: 12~13.3", 1.3~1.6kg, dual-core, priced around US$1500 ~ 2500.</p>
<p>High-end performance models: 14"~16", 2.3~3.3kg, high-end dual-core, discrete graphics card, priced around US$1300 ~ 1800. </p>
<p>In the past two years, new products have appeared on the market.</p>
<p>Entry-level Atom platform: 8.9 ~ 10", 1.2 ~ 1.4kg. Usually referred to as netbooks, these are priced around US$400 ~ 500. </p>
<p>Value CULV platform: 12 ~ 16", 1.33kg ~ 2.4kg, priced around US$700 ~ 900.</p>
<p>The release of these two product types means business users no longer have to pay a high price for slim and compact notebooks.</p>
<p>While these two platforms can't match the dual-core models in performance, </p>
<p>if you have good enough DRAM and HDD they are still more than adequate for most tasks.</p>
<p><img src="http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/1646/mx40022.jpg" alt="mx40022.jpg" /></p>
<p>Let's get back on topic. </p>
<p>The MSI X-Slim X400 doesn't have a discrete graphics card version </p>
<p>so it's probably not suitable for users that have moderate to high 3D performance requirements. </p>
<p>If you are on the move a lot, want a bigger screen without extra weight, the X400 does offer a new choice. </p>
<p>Standard 14" notebooks might offer dual-core and discrete graphics cards, but they usually weigh 2.1~2.5kg as well. </p>
<p>That's a little heavy for people who spend a lot of time outdoors or on the move.</p>
<p>The X400's casing is not made of the magnesium alloy used on the X340 but the special matt finish makes it look just as good. </p>
<p>The cut-out and blue-white color scheme gives a very good first impression as well. </p>
<p>The latest wave of compact CULV notebooks means the rule for business notebooks that you pay more for less weight is now well and truly broken.</p>
<p>For business users, there is finally have a choice when it comes to looking for an inexpensive, slim and easy to carry notebook. </p>
<p>In the past, if you wanted a slim notebook you had to settle for 12~13.3" products. </p>
<p>The MSI X-Slim X400 with a 4-cell battery weighs just 1.55kg, so these users can now have a compact 14" model to choose from as well. </p>
<p>The price of the X400 at launch was about US$740 (24,300 NTD) so the C/P ratio is quite good overall. </p>
<p>If a version with a discrete graphics card or the SU9400 dual-core CPU is released in the future, </p>
<p>it will make this 14" slim notebook all the more attractive. </p>
<p>I hope MSI will put more effort into its product lineup as well </p>
<p>and release more notebooks that offer great C/P ratios for the consumers to choose from.  <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
<p>Once again, I've used my Spyder 2 calibrator to come up with a color calibration file for all X400 users. </p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/8351/mx40023.jpg" alt="mx40023.jpg" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.twcarpc.com/photo/wwm/2009/MX400/windwithme-MSIX400.icm">windwithme MSI X-Slim X400</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/173214</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/173214</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:49:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hands on with a thin and stylish 14&quot; CULV Notebook – the MSI X-Slim X400 on Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:23:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Now take a look at the performance benchmarks. </p>
<p>The MSI X-Slim X400 with the latest Intel 45nm Core Solo CPU.</p>
<p>The CPU model is the SU3500 1.4GHz, L2 3MB, single core edition.</p>
<p>The X400 comes bundled with the Vista Home Premium OS.</p>
<p>Default desktop.</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/2887/mx400os.png" alt="mx400os.png" /></p>
<p>Vista performance benchmarks.</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/5719/mx400vista.png" alt="mx400vista.png" /></p>
<p>The X400 offers above-average system performance so the HDD </p>
<p>and DRAM scores relatively well and these determine how smoothly the OS runs for general applications. </p>
<p>Even though it was running the Vista system, the X400 did not feel any slower during use, </p>
<p>even when compared with other dual-core, quad-core or even higher-speed, computer systems. </p>
<p>Loaded with the Windows 7 7600 RTM now so popular instead.</p>
<p>This is an OS that offers the Vista interface but only has XP resource requirements.</p>
<p>CPU performance benchmarks.</p>
<p>Super PI 1M =&gt; 35.942s</p>
<p>CPUMARK99 =&gt; 202</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/4111/mx400w7pi.png" alt="mx400w7pi.png" /></p>
<p>Overall system performance.</p>
<p>CrystalMark 2004R3</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/2139/mx400w7cm.png" alt="mx400w7cm.png" /></p>
<p>CINEBENCH R10.</p>
<p>1 CPU=&gt; 1645</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/51/mx400w7cb.png" alt="mx400w7cb.png" /></p>
<p>PCMark Vantage =&gt; 1721.</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/6149/mx400w7pcvan.png" alt="mx400w7pcvan.png" /></p>
<p>Windows 7 performance benchmarks.</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/5261/mx400w7os.png" alt="mx400w7os.png" /></p>
<p>There's no sense of lag from the X400 hardware when working in the OS. </p>
<p>It remains very responsive even with a lot of programs open. </p>
<p>For users who do not need much 3D acceleration or graphics processing, this kind of performance is good enough.</p>
<p>WD 320GB 5400rpm HDD performance.</p>
<p>ATTO Disk Benchmark &amp; FDBENCH</p>
<p><img src="http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/3054/mx400w7hdd1.png" alt="mx400w7hdd1.png" /></p>
<p>HD Tune Pro &amp; CrystalDisk Mark.</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/6685/mx400w7hdd2.png" alt="mx400w7hdd2.png" /></p>
<p>The new 5400 RPM 2.5 HDD uses a larger platter so performance is improved.</p>
<p>File read and writes now approach 65~70MB/s, while the average read/write speed is around 53MB/s. </p>
<p>These new 5400 RPM products, should mean a very smooth experience in the OS or general applications. </p>
<p>The motherboard is based on the Intel GS45 chipset with integrated GMA4500MDH graphics card.</p>
<p>3DMARK2003</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/9615/mx400w73d03.png" alt="mx400w73d03.png" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/173213</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/173213</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:23:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hands on with a thin and stylish 14&quot; CULV Notebook – the MSI X-Slim X400 on Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:11:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There is a row of detailed status lights at the bottom of the keyboard. </p>
<p>The Fn key is needed to activate the shortcut keys. </p>
<p>The X400 uses a separate color for the bezel giving it a more quality appearance.</p>
<p><img src="http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/9898/mx40011.jpg" alt="mx40011.jpg" /></p>
<p>The size of the keyboard is adequate, although the keys feel a little soft to the touch.</p>
<p>For the X-series, MSI moved the Fn key to its usual place on the keyboard.</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/2861/mx40012.jpg" alt="mx40012.jpg" /></p>
<p>The Ultra-thin 14.1" 16:9 mirror-surface LCD with 1366 x 768 resolution.</p>
<p>The 1.3MP Webcam is above the screen in the middle and the microphone is to the left. </p>
<p>The power button is in the bottom right hand corner and glows white when the machine is on.</p>
<p><img src="http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/3835/mx40013.jpg" alt="mx40013.jpg" /></p>
<p>View of the underside.</p>
<p>Here the casing has a nice looking matt finish.</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/4264/mx40014.jpg" alt="mx40014.jpg" /></p>
<p>This is where the battery goes.</p>
<p>The space to the upper left is reserved for the 3.5G module. </p>
<p>The actual module varies depending on the national specifications.</p>
<p><img src="http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/5403/mx40015.jpg" alt="mx40015.jpg" /></p>
<p>The X400 has more vents than the X340 and they are arranged in a more interesting way.</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/2381/mx40016.jpg" alt="mx40016.jpg" /></p>
<p>The I/O ports on the left side of the machine.</p>
<p>D-Sub output; RJ45 network port; HDMI output; Card Reader.</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/4492/mx40017.jpg" alt="mx40017.jpg" /></p>
<p>The I/O ports on the right side of the machine.</p>
<p>Power socket; Audio I/O; USB 2.0 x 2</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/742/mx40018.jpg" alt="mx40018.jpg" /></p>
<p>The cut-out design around the keyboard is very appealing. </p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/493/mx40019.jpg" alt="mx40019.jpg" /></p>
<p>Look how thin a 14" notebook can be – this is just about 2.45cm thick.</p>
<p>There is no discrete graphics card and the actual weight is just 1.55kg.</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/6226/mx40020.jpg" alt="mx40020.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/173212</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/173212</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:11:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hands on with a thin and stylish 14&quot; CULV Notebook – the MSI X-Slim X400 on Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:01:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>This year Intel released a new 45nm single-core, ultra low voltage CPU referred to as the CULV. </p>
<p>By comparison, the earlier Atom 512K's low CPU performance limited it to basic word processing tasks. </p>
<p>Intel had also insisted that the Atom processor only be used on NetBook products under 11.6". </p>
<p>Ordinary notebooks are usually between 12~13.3".</p>
<p>Compact models that weigh 1.3~1.7kg or less are often very expensive. </p>
<p>The introduction of the new CULV architecture has brought about a significant price drop in the notebook market. </p>
<p>The CULV has also put a lot of pressure on high-end compact notebooks for business users. </p>
<p>Although the new CULV CPU lacks the performance of a dual core CPU in a high-end business notebook </p>
<p>it has turned the tables on the conventional notebook market view that a lighter weight means a higher price. </p>
<p>Right now, CULV notebooks cost between US$700 ~ 900, or about half the price of a business notebook. </p>
<p>They are a lot lighter than US$1500 ~ 2000 business notebooks or even the average US$700 ~ 900 for a dual-core notebook.</p>
<p>The X-Slim series launched by MSI this year is based on CULV architecture. </p>
<p>The X-Slim is available in three models: X340 (13.3"), X400 (14.1") and X600 (15.6"). </p>
<p>MSI has kept the price under US$900 for all three models and the version with the CM 723 CPU can be had for less than US$700. </p>
<p>In this hands-on review, we take a look at the MSI X-Slim X400. </p>
<p>What really makes this model stand out is its official weight of 1.5kg. </p>
<p>This is a lot lighter than your standard dual-core 14" Notebook weighing around 2.2 ~ 2.6kg. </p>
<p>It's also lighter than 14" CULV notebooks of other brands that weigh in at around 1.9kg. </p>
<p>When it comes to weight loss, the MSI X-Slim series really does it better than any other.</p>
<p>X400's product box</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/4784/mx40001.jpg" alt="mx40001.jpg" /></p>
<p>Included accessories</p>
<p>Windows Vista Home Premium, product warranty, driver CD and user manuals</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/8094/mx40002.jpg" alt="mx40002.jpg" /></p>
<p>The MSI X-Slim X400 itself</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/3159/mx40003.jpg" alt="mx40003.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/1231/mx40004.jpg" alt="mx40004.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/6729/mx40005.jpg" alt="mx40005.jpg" /></p>
<p>The carry bag bundled with the X400 has a leather-like texture on the outside and the MSI logo is inside. </p>
<p>It feels really nice and is quite thin so it doesn't take up space.</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/4572/mx40006.jpg" alt="mx40006.jpg" /></p>
<p>The transformer is the usual small form-factor version. </p>
<p>This is good, because it's easier to carry around. </p>
<p>However, it is my experience, with some other brands of Netbooks, that small transformers tend to heat up a bit in use. </p>
<p>In a trial of the MSI X-Slim charger, I found it did not heat up too much but took longer to give a full charge. </p>
<p>DELTA is a well-established brand so you can count on the quality.</p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/7615/mx40007.jpg" alt="mx40007.jpg" /></p>
<p>The included mouse is the compact type with internal cabling and is the same pearl white color as the machine.</p>
<p><img src="http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/6097/mx40008.jpg" alt="mx40008.jpg" /></p>
<p>The 4-cell battery is rated at 2150mAh 32Wh</p>
<p><img src="http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/8109/mx40009.jpg" alt="mx40009.jpg" /></p>
<p>Opening the cover shows the inside is fully protected. </p>
<p>The screen and keyboard are all covered in transparent plastic film. </p>
<p>There is also a protective cotton pad in the middle with the MSI logo. </p>
<p><img src="http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/7518/mx40010.jpg" alt="mx40010.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/173211</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/173211</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:01:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>