<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[2009 Mid&#x2F;Low-Priced PC w&#x2F; Intel platform OC educational article]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The last two years saw the emergence of the Netbook and its fast acceptance, </p>
<p>along with the gradual decrease of desktop PCs in the market.</p>
<p>Of my close friends and classmates, when buying a new computer, </p>
<p>over half just simply consider buying a notebook. </p>
<p>One situation I have run into is the first-time buyer. </p>
<p>Unless they only want to go online – in which case they later buy a notebook or netbook </p>
<p>– oftentimes they still feel the notebook/netbook doesn’t meet their needs and then buy a desktop PC.</p>
<p>My personal view is notebooks are primarily for people who spend a lot of time outside, </p>
<p>and require the convenience of all-the-time access to a PC.</p>
<p>If most of the computing needs are at home, I would still recommend getting a PC and a 22” monitor for more ideal computing. </p>
<p>This combo is actually still about the same price as a 10” Netbook.</p>
<p>Additionally, a desktop PC’s price range is lower, has better performance, and can easily combine with better performing sound and visual systems.</p>
<p>Choosing a desktop PC does require some homework.</p>
<p>Most entry-level models have a price around NTD10,000~12,000 (around USD 330~450). </p>
<p>For this report we have a budget of around NTD 13,500~15,000 (about USD 400~450) to make a better performing PC for the reference of those in need of a new computer.</p>
<p>CPU</p>
<p>I will be using the currently hot Intel Pentium dual-core E5200 with 2.5GHz, 45nm architecture and 2MB Cache.</p>
<p>Recently, the Malaysian made 5 capacitors version has had a surprisingly good performance. </p>
<p>This week, for B834, the online community saw that between Q828~Q838 can all achieve around 4GHz. </p>
<p>The CPU is around NTD 2300, about USD 68 give or take.</p>
<p>E5200’s outside appearance:</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/8146/09intel01.jpg" alt="09intel01.jpg" /></p>
<p>Packaged items:</p>
<p>User guide, sticker, heat sink, and the E5200 CPU</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/715/09intel02.jpg" alt="09intel02.jpg" /></p>
<p>Memory DRAM</p>
<p>Since 2008 the price of DDR2 has been constantly dropping, and the current price of DRAM is about the same as the cost to make it. </p>
<p>Of course, choosing 2GB X2 is an economic choice,</p>
<p> and since it is better to have more than to not have it and need it, we won't skimp on the DRAM.</p>
<p>I am using Corsair DDR2 800 2 GB X2, dual channel; though the price is a wee bit higher, </p>
<p>Corsair is an international recognized brand that is known for being very stable in dual channel, and the price is still well within the acceptable level.</p>
<p>This piece was around NTD 1500, which is about USD 44.</p>
<p>CORSAIR TWIN2X4096-6400C5 G</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/3604/09intel03.jpg" alt="09intel03.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/5706/09intel04.jpg" alt="09intel04.jpg" /></p>
<p>Motherboard</p>
<p>Currently, when building an Intel platform, the chipset of choice is most likely the Intel P45. </p>
<p>The P45, since its unveiling last May - already some time now </p>
<p>- has been used by all motherboard manufacturers to compete with one another.</p>
<p>I am using the DFI BLOOD-IRON P45; its cost - for a P45+ICH10R - is at an entry level, </p>
<p>but overclocking is a DFI specialty so its capability is good.</p>
<p>This board runs NTD 3700, about USD 110.</p>
<p>DFI BLOOD-IRON P45 specs</p>
<p> <img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/3798/09intel05.jpg" alt="09intel05.jpg" /></p>
<p>Southbridge ICH10R, supporting RAID</p>
<p>Two PCI-E slots supporting ATI CrossFireX dual-GPU technology</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/5073/09intel06.jpg" alt="09intel06.jpg" /></p>
<p>Graphics card</p>
<p>Since ATI and NVIDIA are the two major players, I spent a long time thinking about which 3D chip, either the ATI 4670 or NVIDIA's 9600GT. </p>
<p>With P45 supporting ATI CFX technology, I decided, in the end, to go with the MSI R4670 1GB.</p>
<p>This card runs around NTD 2850, about USD 84.</p>
<p>MSI R4670-2D1G/D3</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/948/09intel07.jpg" alt="09intel07.jpg" /></p>
<p>This card has DVI IO ports and 1 GB DDR3 RAM.</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/6587/09intel08.jpg" alt="09intel08.jpg" /></p>
<p>Hard Drive</p>
<p>Most economical hard drives these days run about 500-640 GB. </p>
<p>The Seagate’s 11th generation had a few problematic products requiring changes to the firmware. </p>
<p>However, the new 12th generation 500 GB HDD has had no reports of any issues.</p>
<p>I used the Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500 GB, which runs around NTD 1900, about USD 52.</p>
<p>The Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500 GB HDD</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/2858/09intel09.jpg" alt="09intel09.jpg" /></p>
<p>Different from other 3.5" HDDs, this series is thinner.</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/8688/09intel10.jpg" alt="09intel10.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/10574/2009-mid-low-priced-pc-w-intel-platform-oc-educational-article</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:20:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//topic/10574.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:58:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Mid&#x2F;Low-Priced PC w&#x2F; Intel platform OC educational article on Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:37:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>That's an impressive E5200 <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
<p>4ghz with stock cooler and this low vcore is really good! </p>
<p>As I could see, with other batches we could expect a poor 3,5ghz / 3,7 ghz and with much more vcore...</p>
<p>I would know what frequency could it achieve with about 1,4 / 1,45 V ...<img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/cheesy.gif.07c2db7a64fea79abc1c760cfe268c62.gif" alt=":D" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160654</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160654</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Le085]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:37:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Mid&#x2F;Low-Priced PC w&#x2F; Intel platform OC educational article on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:06:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi there! Ithink you found the "Colombo's egg" because a lot of people think that is possible to obtaining good performances only spending a lot of money, whereas you have demonstreated the exaclty opposite! </p>
<p>You found a perfect configuration for the consumers that needs a good performance but having no enough resources to buy the newest products actually on the market, good job!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160653</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160653</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rankine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:06:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Mid&#x2F;Low-Priced PC w&#x2F; Intel platform OC educational article on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:12:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>MSI 4670 1GB Default 750/1746Mhz</p>
<p>3DMARK2006</p>
<p><img src="http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/1695/09inteld06.png" alt="09inteld06.png" /></p>
<p>3DMARK VANTAGE</p>
<p><img src="http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/9344/09inteldvan.png" alt="09inteldvan.png" /></p>
<p>Need for Speed Undercover</p>
<p>1600X1200</p>
<p>Anti-Aliasing 4X</p>
<p><img src="http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/3867/09inteldnfs12.jpg" alt="09inteldnfs12.jpg" /></p>
<p>Crysis Benchmark</p>
<p><img src="http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/4840/09inteldgcb.png" alt="09inteldgcb.png" /></p>
<p>4670 OC 833/2160Mhz</p>
<p>3DMARK2006</p>
<p><img src="http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/1474/09intel4g06oc.png" alt="09intel4g06oc.png" /></p>
<p>3DMARK VANTAGE</p>
<p><img src="http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/8843/09intel4gvanoc.png" alt="09intel4gvanoc.png" /></p>
<p>Need for Speed Undercover</p>
<p>1600X1200</p>
<p>Anti-Aliasing 4X</p>
<p><img src="http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/1389/09intel4gnfs12.jpg" alt="09intel4gnfs12.jpg" /></p>
<p>Crysis Benchmark</p>
<p><img src="http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/1517/09intel4ggcboch.png" alt="09intel4ggcboch.png" /></p>
<p>MSI R4670 overclocking capabilities are excellent.</p>
<p>From the above image, you can see the multiple testing software and gaming results, overclocking yields improvements of about 20~30%.</p>
<p>HDD performance test</p>
<p>HD Tune Pro's shows the fastest performance of 124.1 MB/s, with an average of around 95 MB/s.</p>
<p>CrystalDiskMark read 106.9 MB/s and wrote 110.4 MB/s. </p>
<p><img src="http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/1650/09inteldhdd1.png" alt="09inteldhdd1.png" /></p>
<p>ATTO Disk Benchmark&amp;FDBENCH</p>
<p><img src="http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/3364/09inteldhdd2.png" alt="09inteldhdd2.png" /></p>
<p>Hard drives have no way to be overclocked, and can only run at the factory defaults. </p>
<p>Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 is the first single 500 GB version for the series. </p>
<p>Though its performance its not much better than the previous 320 GB version, </p>
<p>with an improvement of over 10 MB/s across the board, you won't feel it lacks a thing.</p>
<p>The above tested PC configuration ran a total of about NTD12250, about USD360.</p>
<p>Only combining it will a DVD burner, Case, and power supply, and you can have yourself a low-cost overclockable PC. </p>
<p>If one is truly able to overclock and uses it, than it extends the performance life of this computer, </p>
<p>and allows more time to prepare for the next new PC.</p>
<p>Simply speaking, overclocking won't use a lot of time, and is a good way to boost the performance of a PC.</p>
<p>Possibly some people will fear that overclocking will cause instability to the point of a system crash, </p>
<p>but I personally feel, for the average usage scenario, this is a non-issue.</p>
<p>For example, if the CPU can stably perform at 4GHz,</p>
<p>than perhaps one could overclock to only 3.3~3.6GHz and use leave it there for a long time. </p>
<p>The temperature won't be too high, the voltage not too much, and the stability won't be a problem.</p>
<p>Every year, I come up with a similar article in the hopes it can help those looking to build their own PC.</p>
<p>Of course, I want to highlight again, the above specs are not absolute, and can be modified based on the user's needs or budget. </p>
<p>All the parts can be improved or decreased.</p>
<p>For those who are looking for better 3D graphics, the VGA card can be upgraded to an HD4830 or 9800GT, or even a truly high-performance model.</p>
<p>Those looking to improve the CPU, for example those who might do a lot of file conversion, </p>
<p>could also buy a high-level dual-core CPU or even a quad-core Q8200.</p>
<p>One only needs to choose within one's budget, choose the most economical, the best PC suited to his/her needs <img src="/assets/uploads-legacy/emoticons/smiley.gif.f48988bc9f0a933ee8c95d6f744c3df1.gif" alt=":)" />.</p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160652</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160652</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:12:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Mid&#x2F;Low-Priced PC w&#x2F; Intel platform OC educational article on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:05:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>E5200 OC 320 X 12.5 =&gt;4000.5Mhz</p>
<p>Hyper PI 32M 15m52s</p>
<p>CPUMARK 576</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/1061/09intel4gpi.png" alt="09intel4gpi.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalMark</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/4024/09intel4gcm.png" alt="09intel4gcm.png" /></p>
<p>CINEBENCH</p>
<p>(1 CPU) 4620</p>
<p>(x CPU) 8772</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/6084/09intel4gcb.png" alt="09intel4gcb.png" /></p>
<p>Word on the net is that the recent E5200 have been good at overclokcing,</p>
<p>but the 5 capacitors, Made in Malaysia version has not received any negative reviews.</p>
<p>The factory default heat sink is good enough to stably handle 4GHz, and the voltage can be set to under 1.3V. </p>
<p>However, the downside side is that the temperature tested was rather high: when overclocked, full operation in the OS displayed over 70~80 C. </p>
<p>That said, the E5200's only downside was the slightly high tested temperature, </p>
<p>in actuality, the heat sink was only slightly warm to the touch.</p>
<p>DDR2 performance test</p>
<p>2GBX2 DDR2 798.2Mhz</p>
<p>EVEREST 5733MB/s</p>
<p>Sandra Memory 4651MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/4664/09inteld800mem.png" alt="09inteld800mem.png" /></p>
<p>DDR2 OC 927.2Mhz CL5 5-5-18 2.17V</p>
<p>SP2004 Blend type showed a stable 3.90GB </p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/1313/09intel4g927sp.png" alt="09intel4g927sp.png" /></p>
<p>EVEREST 7330MB/s</p>
<p>Sandra Memory 6544MB/s</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/6717/09intel4g927mem.png" alt="09intel4g927mem.png" /></p>
<p>Because DDR2 IC's price has already slid down to rock bottom for sometime now, </p>
<p>the current DDR2 is unlikely, as before, to occasionally show a truly great overclocked performance. </p>
<p>However, 2GB X2 that can overclock to over DDR2 900 can be considered pretty good.</p>
<p>VGA performance test</p>
<p>First, let me introduce how to use software to overclock a VGA card.</p>
<p>Although ATI's driver software comes with overclocking functionality, it limits the frequencies one is allowed to adjust. </p>
<p>Using Riva Tuner VGA software, offers a lot more options. </p>
<p>After opening the software, choose the VGA card picture displayed to enter the tuning portions of the software package.</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/4306/09inteldru1.png" alt="09inteldru1.png" /></p>
<p>From the tuning page, you may tweak the VGA core's and memory's frequencies.</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/8731/09inteldru2.png" alt="09inteldru2.png" /></p>
<p>Choosing the fourth large clock image will monitor the VGA card's status.</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/5869/09inteldru3.png" alt="09inteldru3.png" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160651</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160651</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:05:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Mid&#x2F;Low-Priced PC w&#x2F; Intel platform OC educational article on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:58:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The above combinations are not absolute, if you need less performance even more entry-level products exist, </p>
<p>and, for those demanding more power, higher performance products of course exist.</p>
<p>With a higher budget, one could change the CPU for the higher E7200 or a quad-core Q8200. </p>
<p>The RAM could be upgraded from 2GX2 DDR2 800 to 1066 and the graphics card could be switched for the better performing ATI HD4830 or NVIDIA 9800GT.</p>
<p>The motherboard could also be changed to a P43+ICH10R or P45+ICH10.</p>
<p>However, when looking at cost-to-performance, </p>
<p>most looking to make the above PC upgrades would only pick one more expensive component, and pick one spec to really improve.</p>
<p>Testing Platform</p>
<p>CPU: Intel Pentium Dual Core E5200</p>
<p>MB: DFI BLOOD-IRON P45</p>
<p>DRAM: CORSAIR TWIN2X4096-6400C5 G</p>
<p>VGA:MSI R4670-2D1G/D3</p>
<p>HD:Seasgate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB</p>
<p>POWER:Corsair 400W Power Supply</p>
<p>Cooler:Intel original cooler</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/9348/09intel11.jpg" alt="09intel11.jpg" /></p>
<p>The below tests all use two presets, normal and overclocked, for comparison.</p>
<p>With these components, </p>
<p>overclocking will improve the total PC performance and, without spending the extra money, </p>
<p>bring the performance close to the next level up of components.</p>
<p>First I'll start with an introduction about tweaking the BIOs, the main weapon for upgrading the CPU and DDR2.</p>
<p>Tuning the CPU</p>
<p>E5200 starts at a frequency of 200X12.5 =&gt;2.5 GHz</p>
<p>Simply adjust the CPU Clock to get 320x12.5=&gt;4.0GHz</p>
<p>If you are unsure if the DDR2 can stably keep up with the new setting, at this time you have reset back to the original settings immediately.</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/3586/09inteldb1.jpg" alt="09inteldb1.jpg" /></p>
<p>CPU Voltage settings must be set according to the specifications of each CPU. </p>
<p>For this batch of E5200s, although many can support up to 4GHz without a problem, there are some variations in the quality.</p>
<p> According to information online, the E5200's of the past few weeks need a voltage of around 1.2~1.3V to support a stable 4GHz.</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/2936/09inteldb2.jpg" alt="09inteldb2.jpg" /></p>
<p>Tuning DDR2</p>
<p>When overclocking RAM, the most important thing is DRAM Speed, than the target DRAM speed will show this setting and then run the true DRAM frequency.</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/8820/09inteldb3.jpg" alt="09inteldb3.jpg" /></p>
<p>Like the CPU, tuning DDR2 voltage also depends on each product.</p>
<p>This piece to run stably at DDR2 926 CL5 5-5-18, the DRAM voltage control should be 2.170V.</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/1312/09inteldb4.jpg" alt="09inteldb4.jpg" /></p>
<p>For the parameters, they can be either tweaked manually or left entirely on auto.</p>
<p>When full auto is engaged, the motherboard will pick the DDR2's integrated SPD directly.</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/1354/09inteldb5.jpg" alt="09inteldb5.jpg" /></p>
<p>When overclocking, aside from having good CPU and DDR2, the motherboard's quality also needs to be good. </p>
<p>Every motherboard maker's mainboards have slightly different overclocking capabilities, voltage scopes, compatibility issues, etc. </p>
<p>Aside from what the chipset, P45+ICH10R, can combine with, the motherboard vender is another choice that should be considered. </p>
<p>For overclocking, the DFI BLOOD-IRON P45 is known to be good.</p>
<p>CPU Performance test</p>
<p>E5200 Default 199.6Mhz X 12.5 =&gt;2494Mhz</p>
<p>Hyper PI 32M 22m31s</p>
<p>CPUMARK 359</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/6849/09inteldpi.png" alt="09inteldpi.png" /></p>
<p>CrystalMark</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/5152/09inteldcm.png" alt="09inteldcm.png" /></p>
<p>CINEBENCH</p>
<p>(1 CPU) 2893</p>
<p>(X CPU) 5601</p>
<p><img src="http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/4984/09inteldcb.png" alt="09inteldcb.png" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160650</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160650</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:58:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 2009 Mid&#x2F;Low-Priced PC w&#x2F; Intel platform OC educational article on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:58:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The last two years saw the emergence of the Netbook and its fast acceptance, </p>
<p>along with the gradual decrease of desktop PCs in the market.</p>
<p>Of my close friends and classmates, when buying a new computer, </p>
<p>over half just simply consider buying a notebook. </p>
<p>One situation I have run into is the first-time buyer. </p>
<p>Unless they only want to go online – in which case they later buy a notebook or netbook </p>
<p>– oftentimes they still feel the notebook/netbook doesn’t meet their needs and then buy a desktop PC.</p>
<p>My personal view is notebooks are primarily for people who spend a lot of time outside, </p>
<p>and require the convenience of all-the-time access to a PC.</p>
<p>If most of the computing needs are at home, I would still recommend getting a PC and a 22” monitor for more ideal computing. </p>
<p>This combo is actually still about the same price as a 10” Netbook.</p>
<p>Additionally, a desktop PC’s price range is lower, has better performance, and can easily combine with better performing sound and visual systems.</p>
<p>Choosing a desktop PC does require some homework.</p>
<p>Most entry-level models have a price around NTD10,000~12,000 (around USD 330~450). </p>
<p>For this report we have a budget of around NTD 13,500~15,000 (about USD 400~450) to make a better performing PC for the reference of those in need of a new computer.</p>
<p>CPU</p>
<p>I will be using the currently hot Intel Pentium dual-core E5200 with 2.5GHz, 45nm architecture and 2MB Cache.</p>
<p>Recently, the Malaysian made 5 capacitors version has had a surprisingly good performance. </p>
<p>This week, for B834, the online community saw that between Q828~Q838 can all achieve around 4GHz. </p>
<p>The CPU is around NTD 2300, about USD 68 give or take.</p>
<p>E5200’s outside appearance:</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/8146/09intel01.jpg" alt="09intel01.jpg" /></p>
<p>Packaged items:</p>
<p>User guide, sticker, heat sink, and the E5200 CPU</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/715/09intel02.jpg" alt="09intel02.jpg" /></p>
<p>Memory DRAM</p>
<p>Since 2008 the price of DDR2 has been constantly dropping, and the current price of DRAM is about the same as the cost to make it. </p>
<p>Of course, choosing 2GB X2 is an economic choice,</p>
<p> and since it is better to have more than to not have it and need it, we won't skimp on the DRAM.</p>
<p>I am using Corsair DDR2 800 2 GB X2, dual channel; though the price is a wee bit higher, </p>
<p>Corsair is an international recognized brand that is known for being very stable in dual channel, and the price is still well within the acceptable level.</p>
<p>This piece was around NTD 1500, which is about USD 44.</p>
<p>CORSAIR TWIN2X4096-6400C5 G</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/3604/09intel03.jpg" alt="09intel03.jpg" /></p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/5706/09intel04.jpg" alt="09intel04.jpg" /></p>
<p>Motherboard</p>
<p>Currently, when building an Intel platform, the chipset of choice is most likely the Intel P45. </p>
<p>The P45, since its unveiling last May - already some time now </p>
<p>- has been used by all motherboard manufacturers to compete with one another.</p>
<p>I am using the DFI BLOOD-IRON P45; its cost - for a P45+ICH10R - is at an entry level, </p>
<p>but overclocking is a DFI specialty so its capability is good.</p>
<p>This board runs NTD 3700, about USD 110.</p>
<p>DFI BLOOD-IRON P45 specs</p>
<p> <img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/3798/09intel05.jpg" alt="09intel05.jpg" /></p>
<p>Southbridge ICH10R, supporting RAID</p>
<p>Two PCI-E slots supporting ATI CrossFireX dual-GPU technology</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/5073/09intel06.jpg" alt="09intel06.jpg" /></p>
<p>Graphics card</p>
<p>Since ATI and NVIDIA are the two major players, I spent a long time thinking about which 3D chip, either the ATI 4670 or NVIDIA's 9600GT. </p>
<p>With P45 supporting ATI CFX technology, I decided, in the end, to go with the MSI R4670 1GB.</p>
<p>This card runs around NTD 2850, about USD 84.</p>
<p>MSI R4670-2D1G/D3</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/948/09intel07.jpg" alt="09intel07.jpg" /></p>
<p>This card has DVI IO ports and 1 GB DDR3 RAM.</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/6587/09intel08.jpg" alt="09intel08.jpg" /></p>
<p>Hard Drive</p>
<p>Most economical hard drives these days run about 500-640 GB. </p>
<p>The Seagate’s 11th generation had a few problematic products requiring changes to the firmware. </p>
<p>However, the new 12th generation 500 GB HDD has had no reports of any issues.</p>
<p>I used the Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500 GB, which runs around NTD 1900, about USD 52.</p>
<p>The Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500 GB HDD</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/2858/09intel09.jpg" alt="09intel09.jpg" /></p>
<p>Different from other 3.5" HDDs, this series is thinner.</p>
<p><img src="http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/8688/09intel10.jpg" alt="09intel10.jpg" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160649</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.xtremehardware.com/forum//post/160649</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[windwithme]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:58:01 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>